Kush Audio UBK-1 : VST Windows + 64-Bit Public Beta!

[rodolfo]

I wish UBK-1 presets menu works in Samplitude the same way that Clariphonic DSP does.
Rods

[Izzi]

Originally Posted by rodolfo

I wish UBK-1 presets menu works in Samplitude the same way that Clariphonic DSP does.
Rods

I hear ya... This issue has been going on for way too long!

P.S.
I wish the Clariphonic DSP presets worked in Logic & Pro Tools the same way UBK-1 does!

[johnnynash]

Just bought this and I think I'm in love :-) There are no presets and I don't care, I'm on Reaper,PC by the way.

[u b k]

At long, long, long long long last!

Thank you everyone for your excessively wonderful patience, these are beta's but they seem completely stable so enjoy the freedom from those stinkin' bridges!

The House of Kush Webstore is where you can get the full version, or a demo code.

The House of Kush Downloads is where you can just grab the plugin file if you already own a license.

Heads up: the downloaded 64-bit files are not installers, they're the actual plugin files so you gotta drop them in the directory where they belong, and if you don't have a license you need to either download the demo code as well, or better yet (for me, ha!) just buy one!

Thanks again, I can't tell you how hard we've worked to make this happen and how grateful I am for everyone's support and indulgence as we figure out the world of digital.

Enjoy!


Gregory Scott - ubk

[K-Slash]

Yay ! Great !

Hope that x64 versions of Clariphonic DSP will follow shortly .

[stonewalters]

Congrats on the release of this Greg!

[henge]

AMAZING!! Congrats UBK!!

[Jeezo]

great !!

by the way any eta on the clariphonic new features requested ?

[Dappolito]

Originally Posted by u b k

I can't tell you how hard we've worked to make this happen

Can you explain a non coder whats so hard about making a 64 bit plugin ?

[K-Slash]

Originally Posted by Jeezo

great !!

by the way any eta on the clariphonic new features requested ?

Which new features ?

[Tommy D]

JOY! Thank you!!!

[K-Slash]

Works great in Samplitude Pro X v12.2 !

[u b k]

Originally Posted by Dappolito

Can you explain a non coder whats so hard about making a 64 bit plugin ?

Absolutely!

For starters, making *any* plugin is hard, but aside from that: the truth is that making a 64-bit plugin is no harder than making a 32-bit plugin.

What is a *billion* times harder to do is wrap a 64-bit plugin in PACE's 64-bit copy protection technology, because

1) it is relatively new compared to the widely used 32-bit tech, and

2) it is 100x more complicated to implement, so

3) there are very few people on the planet who understand how to do it, and

4) of those who do understand it, almost all of them are either

a) busy doing it for their own company, or

b) busy doing it for someone else who already waited a year for their turn


So what we needed was a knowledgeable and available person in a tiny subset of an already tiny population of people on earth. That person took a long time to find, and even after we found them it then took a long time to implement the technology because doing so is more of an art than a science and there's a lot of trial and error and testing/reiteration/re-testing.

But we got there, so my hope is that the Clariphonic DSP will be a much faster process!


Gregory Scott - ubk

[Beatworld]

Originally Posted by u b k

At long, long, long long long last!
Thank you everyone for your excessively wonderful patience, these are beta's but they seem completely stable so enjoy the freedom from those stinkin' bridges!
Enjoy!
Gregory Scott - ubk

Thanks VERY much Gregory.
So far so good Logic 9.1.8

[acmusic]

Excellent, Greg. Just did had my first session using UBK on the 2Buss (32 bit version)-your ears must have been burning.
Thanks again for making 64bit happen

[Rockin*Gio]

Originally Posted by u b k

What is a *billion* times harder to do is wrap a 64-bit plugin in PACE's 64-bit copy protection technology, because

Gregory Scott - ubk

Thanks Greg (and the rest of your team) for all the effort and hard work in bringing us the 64-bit version. The UBK-1 was my favorite comp/tone bending plugin until I made the leap to 64-bit back in October. It will be nice to have this back in the arsenal again.

I have the hardware UBK Fatso and Clariphonic...but still look forward to having the Clariphonic DSP for mixing "ITB" when it becomes available in 64-bit as well!!

[dasindevin]

Awesome!!

[borg64]

Originally Posted by u b k

At long, long, long long long last!

Nice one, thanks Greg!

[henge]

Running smooth in Reaper 64, win 7!!
No presets though...

[Jeezo]

Originally Posted by K-Slash

Which new features ?

at least an output gain .....to be able to A/B at the same level

[Agzilla]

Oh yeaaah...

Running perfect here... Logic 64bit with a 32bit Kernel (Old Mac!) But plug and DAW in 64bit running just PERFECT! Unlike some.... yeah i know... Hardware issue, old computer...etc...

But the Kush Crew got it going on!!!

I prefer the Kush name btw....




Zz.

[Jeezo]

ba ba ba kush ....

[K-Slash]

Originally Posted by Jeezo

at least an output gain .....to be able to A/B at the same level

Alright.

[henge]

Originally Posted by Jeezo

ba ba ba kush ....

LOL!

[tomteontour]

Originally Posted by u b k

So what we needed was a knowledgeable and available person in a tiny subset of an already tiny population of people on earth. That person took a long time to find, and even after we found them it then took a long time to implement the technology because doing so is more of an art than a science and there's a lot of trial and error and testing/reiteration/re-testing

Gregory Scott - ubk

Thanks again for the great work! I just wonder why Pace are creating their own rocket science there ? I suppose it is a real pain for developers like to to have to run through a bottleneck like this...

[Beatworld]

Originally Posted by Jeezo

at least an output gain .....to be able to A/B at the same level

GUI > bottom right hand corner > Master.

[_dada_]

Yep, stop using Pace !
It costs the companies a fortune, diminishes sales, prolongs releases
and causes legal users way more grieve, than acceptable ...

But then ... coding Your own Copy Protection ( like Waves, PSP, etc. etc. )
is probably an even bigger issue, for a hardware guy

Jan

[claesbjo]

Originally Posted by _dada_

Yep, stop using Pace !
It costs the companies a fortune, diminishes sales, prolongs releases
and causes legal users way more grieve, then acceptable ...

But then ... coding Your own Copy Protection ( like Waves, PSP, etc. etc. )
is probably an even bigger issue, for a hardware guy

Jan

Everyone not using Ilok gets cracked on day one more or less...I totally understand why Plug in dev´s feel the need to use it.

[u b k]

Originally Posted by _dada_

But then ... coding Your own Copy Protection ( like Waves, PSP, etc. etc. ) is probably an even bigger issue, for a hardware guy

BINGO, and thank you for understanding that point, it's huge to me.

I want to develop compressors that turn a hard vocal into butter, and eq's that pull out notes and chords rather than random chunks of frequencies.

I do NOT want to spend one single second of my life developing, maintaining, and constantly updating/upgrading a proprietary copy protection scheme.

Life's too short, and ya gotta focus on what you do best!


Gregory Scott - ubk

[_dada_]

Originally Posted by tomteontour

I just wonder why Pace are creating their own rocket science there ?

Well, to keep the elite hackers from cracking their code ...
Sadly their skills seem just enough, to program a toaster.
( since how many years is this Firefox promise on top of their site ??? )

and yes, this led/leads to some serious issues with their 'rocket' !


But ... to be fair ... the recent failures where not as harmful
as earlier 'oversights'.

Jan