![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #91 |
| Gear Head Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 36
|
I sell my mixbuss license. Someone interested? Sent from my HTC Desire using Tapatalk |
| | |
| | #92 | |
| Gear addict Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 317
| Quote:
I am running Mixbus on my workstation on Linux, latency isn't an issue, meaning I can go low latency without having to compile kernels etc. easily(Down to around 6mS or so). I have gone lower many years back, but I suspect I would need to compile my own kernel at that point and I haven't had a need, so I haven't bothered. I have purchased the LinuxDSP plugins, and have been playing around with other plugins as well. It didn't hurt that I knew of and have used LADSPA plugins for some time on OS X, but I am finding even many of those are replaced effectively between Mixbus and LinuxDSP. I haven't really gotten much work recently requiring the more 'creative' plugins rather than your typical EQ, Dynamics, etc. so I won't speak on that much yet, I might still be using some LADSPAs but I also haven't tried the guitar stompbox collection from LinuxDSP either. In as far as Jack, personally it is one of the greatest strengths of audio on Linux IMO. I already posted an example earlier of how I am using it to tie multiple machines together, to do design work on animations and similar. And I personally prefer the concept of using multiple pieces of software rather than trying to shove everything into a single piece. But what I do think could use some work in these situations is session management, something being addressed by incorporating some of it into Jack IIRC, but also by other projects like LASH which pretty much open all programs at once, configure all routing, etc. Combined with Jack TimeCode it works out decently enough I think. I do still have a few plugins I run externally to Mixbus through Festige. These are namely my audio restoration plugins right now, where there is no alternative on Linux that is acceptable IMO. But I was pleasantly surprised how easy this was and smooth it ran on Linux to be honest. So I create an insert on a track in Mixbus and route it into the processor as if it is an external effects unit and have been pretty pleased. I still have Mixbus on my macbook pro, and on my mac mini at home, but most of my work is now done on Linux and honestly I have been enjoying it even more than I did on OS X. I was never really comfortable with the 'Apple Way' personally and enjoy my workflow more now that I have customized it to my liking. This being said I will probably always keep around at least one OS X machine(Unless Apple keeps going the way it currently is with production tools) more because I need to run software that can't run in Linux, and sometimes even on OS X so I have to boot into a VM. But I honestly thought that switching back to Linux (I did start doing audio professionally on Linux many years ago and switched for various reasons -- hardware, plugins, etc.) was going to be much harder on me than it really has been. One month and a half down so far without any major issues really. Seablade | |
| | |
| | #93 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #94 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 286
| |
| | |
| | #95 |
| Gear Head Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 36
| |
| | |
| | #96 |
| Harrison Consoles Joined: Mar 2007 Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 22
Thread Starter | PM'ed both of you. Email us at: mixbus@harrisonconsoles.com |
| | |
| | #97 |
| Harrison Consoles Joined: Mar 2007 Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 22
Thread Starter | Mixbus 2.0.6: Free Update Mixbus 2.0.6 is now available. This version adds many important fixes for Windows as well as improvements for OSX and Linux. Customers should receive update links via email today. If you don't receive an email by the end of today, please send us an email at mixbus@harrisonconsoles.com This is our first update for Windows, and it is a FREE download. Improvements in 2.06 include: Windows:
OSX:
For a complete list of changes, see the user manual. |
| | |
| | #98 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2005 Location: Canada/Mexico
Posts: 1,887
| Quote:
I'm loving what I'm reading here specially the Windows Improvs. And when say this version is FREE? Means what? Just to clarify, Is this release a kind of a Beta release not RC? Any limitations or a full 30 days working DAW? Or still with the annoying Limitations Generated Noise Hiss? Thank you for any additional clarification on this regard. And Again, looking forward to give this a try, thank you for listening and can see that #Harrison has been working hard in the Development Lab. All the best
__________________ MY Music Producer, Mix Engineer, Entrepreneur http://soundcloud.com/absolutmy www.myspace.com/absolutmy | |
| | |
| | #99 |
| Gear addict Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 343
|
Hi Solar, It's a free update for Harrison's registered users. It's also available free as a demo. The occasional "hiss" still exists in the demo, sorry. -Ben |
| | |
| | #100 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 249
|
I get an error while installing Mixbus 2.0.6: Error 1609 "no valid user group" Win7 64 bit |
| | |
| | #101 |
| Gear interested Joined: May 2010
Posts: 7
|
Same error here on w7 64
|
| | |
| | #102 |
| Gear addict Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 343
|
@sjaak & bishop66 : weird, w7 64 is our most common test machine. It sounds like something we need to fix in the installer. Please send us a note at: mixbus@harrisonconsoles.com if you have time to help us troubleshoot it. -Ben Loftis Harrison Consoles |
| | |
| | #103 |
| Gear addict Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 343
| We have verified that we have a "permissions" problem when running the installer on some non-English Windows systems. We hope to have the installer fixed tomorrow. Sorry for the inconvenience! -Ben @ Harrison |
| | |
| | #104 |
| Gear nut Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 118
|
Don't forget to uninstall the old version of mixbuss first in win side ...... |
| | |
| | #105 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 249
| |
| | |
| | #106 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 249
| |
| | |
| | #107 |
| Gear addict Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 343
|
@sjaak & bishop66 : We have a new installer that solves the "permissions" problem on non-English systems. Please write us at mixbus@harrisonconsoles.com if you'd like an updated link. I've updated the store packages, so new Demo users or purchasers should get the new version. -Ben Loftis Harrison Consoles |
| | |
| | #108 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2005 Location: Canada/Mexico
Posts: 1,887
| Quote:
Now back to your 2.06 version, the Added VST Folder management is indeed amazing but little concern regarding Scanning plugins. Of course as you guys mentioned, Mixbus has some issues scanning some plugins, thats fine, but can you guys make it a way that if Mixbus sees a plugins that it can NOT SCAN, instead of Crashing, to Pass over it and leave a notification that this or these particular plugins haven't passed the scanning process a la Studio One or even I think Sonar has this ability instead of completely see Mixbus freeze and crash out? For the simple reason the fact that in your VST Folder Management, it seems that Mixbus goes and scan what it thinks its oyur Default vst plugin path. And when I go and add my Vst PATH and Click on Scan for plugins & Save Plugins Paths, when Mixbus encounter a plugins that it can not SCAN, it freezes and sometimes you to FORCE TO QUIT and when you re-open Mixbus, instead of SAVING that NEW PATH you assigned, it goes and re-give you the what it thnks is the Default Vst path. Second, instead of Mixbus really memorizing & saving the New path, it doesn't of course NOT, remember the plugins that passes the SCAN. So in other word, you have to Re-start back again!! I just tested this out Live NOW and ain't working. I think that the Additiona Vst plugin Manager is amazing, but Still requires some WORK and some deep Beta Testing big time before releasing it out!! Looking forward to hear about this matter. Of course if i'm doing something wrong, then please show me the way but I doubt i'm doing something wrong. Thanx & great add-ons so far P.S Also, something I noticed weird, lets say you go under the Vst plug Manager ok, and you Clear Paths & Cache, then yo go to "Add Vst Folder" ok, once you added that Vst folder, you should be able once you added your Folder to have the feature to Set Defaults, meaning the folders you've added as Default Vst plugins Path. Although I understand what Mixbus "Set Default" is refering to. And why Im saying this its because the fact that on my experience with this release 2.06, the moment you add your Folder and decide to Scan and lets say Mixbus freeze and restart Mixbus, it does NOT keep your chosen assigned Vst path, it kind of Reset to where it was and you have to go BACK and redo the steps again etc.. etc. Voila Here is a screenshot of what i'm trying to say. By default, this is what Mixbus has as a path for my plugins. As you can see clearly, the first path before ( is a the correct path but there is the Toontrack that is on the way, so in other word, Mixbus just decided that my main Vst path is : C:\Program Files (x86)\Steinberg\VstPlugins\Toontrack when indeed is C:\Program Files (x86)\Steinberg\VstPluginsNow Mixbus also added the second path C:\Users\Administrator\Documents\Plugins\VST (this one never created it). Now what I did was Add VST Folder and I added this one: C:\Program Files (x86)\Steinberg\VstPlugins and then it start Scanning etc.. but of course it Freezes Mixbus because of plugin like the ones 112dB, AcmeBarGig & others. But as you can see in the screenshot, when I restart Mixbus, it didn't keep the Path I assigned, it went back to : C:\Program Files (x86)\Steinberg\VstPlugins\Toontrack;C:\Users\Administrator\Documents\Plugins\VST | |
| | |
| | #109 | |
| Gear addict Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 343
| Quote:
If Mixbus crashes while scanning a plugin, it puts it in a "blacklist" so that the next time you scan for plugins, it will avoid this one. Obviously there is still some room for improvement (it would be better to scan in a separate app, as some other DAWs do, to avoid a crash altogether). However I think you'll agree that it is now much better. Your other comments have been noted, thanks! I agree that the VST Paths should get saved "before" the scan so that you don't have to re-create the paths after a crash. Best Regards, -Ben | |
| | |
| | #110 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2005 Location: Canada/Mexico
Posts: 1,887
| Quote:
And as i said above, you see the dilemma, so i'll hold into this and wait for a quick fix regarding this WHOLE Vstplugins Path Area under Preference to be taking care of before going forward with Mixbus. Looking forward another built release | |
| | |
| | #111 | |
| Gear maniac Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 249
| Quote:
(Crash did not happen with old 2.0.5) | |
| | |
| | #112 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2005 Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 884
|
Plug-in scanning seems not to work. I can add the additional path but nothing occurs while clicking the "scanning..." button.
|
| | |
| | #113 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 259
| |
| | |
| | #114 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,258
|
Dang. I've never seen so many whiners in one place. Do you ever get anything done? Code your own daw if you don't like it.
|
| | |
| | #115 |
| Gear nut Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 127
|
Works great for me, very stable....Win7, i7
|
| | |
| | #116 |
| Gear interested Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11
|
scan vst plugins crashs here!
|
| | |
| | #117 |
| Gear interested Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 17
|
I've ben using Mixbuss since it first came out and have continued to support the development by purchasing the windows version also. I personally think Mixbuss rocks , yeah some issue to sort through but the team will get there no doubt. What i don't understand is why can we make mono compatible plug ins active in Cubase/Pro Tools from VSTWraps i.e VST to RTAS adapter which will allow the user to insert a mono plug in on a mono track and im finding in Mixbuss for this not to be the case. Something to think about or something I could have missed?? |
| | |
| | #118 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,258
|
Does anyone have problems with Waves Tune in mixbus? It doesn't scan the audio for me. My other Waves plugs work fine.
|
| | |
| | #119 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 259
|
This is a great product, but please make the VST part solid!!! I have plenty of vst plugins that don't load (invalid I/O for this track/bus) and some that freeze Mixbus. Also changing parameters directly on vst gui don't change the assigned parameters. I really hope you'll fix all those nasty bugs very fast.
__________________ www.sonuslabstudio.com |
| | |
| | #120 |
| Gear nut Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 127
| |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Future of DAWs | Slim ManDjango | Music computers | 83 | 13th April 2012 09:05 PM |
| Many (100+) analog outs from a DAW? | Testing123 | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 5 | 9th April 2008 06:51 PM |
| The most simple device for mobile recording with laptop - 4 digital in | ISedlacek | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 20 | 31st March 2008 09:31 PM |
| HP nx8220 notebook - Device fixes in Windows Server 2003 | RainbowStorm | Music computers | 0 | 14th January 2007 02:58 PM |
| Portable PTHD - this guy is cool! | Jules | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 9 | 22nd April 2003 10:04 PM |
| |