Gigastudio R.I.P. - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > News > New Product Alert! > Product Alerts older than 2 months


Gigastudio R.I.P.

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 25th July 2008   #1
Lives for gear
 
Silver Sonya's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 7,209

Thread Starter
Gigastudio R.I.P.

Just got a dismaying email from Geoffrey Gee

The email was entitled "The Future Of Plectrum."


Greetings Musicians,

Tascam announced this week that they are ceasing development of Gigastudio products, which includes the GVI engine on which Plectrum runs. As a result, we will not be able to release Mac Plectrum as planned.

Needless to say, we are deeply disappointed by this news. The timing is especially difficult for us, because Mac Plectrum was functional and nearly complete but not quite release-ready. We're sorry we continued to pass along to you Tascam's promises of completion.

Nevertheless, we are determined to make Plectrum available to Mac users. We pledge to release this collection of unique instruments on a Mac friendly platform as soon as possible! We will let you know as soon as we have settled on a platform and timetable for release. Thanks to your interest and support, we know that Plectrum has an eager community of players waiting.

Also, please note that Plectrum is and will remain available for Windows and Vista, regardless of Tascam's future plans. The existing PC version of Plectrum is complete and self-contained, and is not negatively affected by this announcement.

Best,

Geoffrey Gee

Plectrum Support


Bummer.

- c
Silver Sonya is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2008   #2
Gear maniac
 
Ben J's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 161

Good thing I didn't upgrade to V4.

GS3 Orchestra was one of most buyer's remorse purchases I've made.
Ben J is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2008   #3
Lives for gear
 
Saudade's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: Birthplace of the Soundblaster
Posts: 633

GS was required back then when RAM wasn't enough...streaming from disk was their selling point. With RAM dirt cheap and mobos and OS supporting up to 8GB, why would anyone need to stream from disk? What with harddisks soon to be taken over by solidstate drives? And technologies that came out which allows minimal RAM use through on-the-fly data compression?

I'm just surprised GS didn't die sooner, because the ridiculously long time they took to move from version 2.5 (their peak) to 3 cost them the entire market taken over by platforms like Kontakt, who cleverly permeated the market by letting many sample libraries developers integrate their Kontakt player. They basically forgot their product's popularity is still 90% based on the variety and quality of the sample libraries developed for that platform. Nobody needs a soft sampler with the most powerful engine and most simultaneous streams when there is hardly any libraries you can use it with without conversion. And GS3 still did not address the need for a soft sampler within the vst host, not a stand alone application which is a nightmare for file mgmt and archival. They waited until version 4 GVI, by the time, all was over

That's normally the outcome when a hardware company buys over a software company, they know nuts how to perpetuate the lifespan of a software which is the only thing that makes it worth paying for: upgrades and more upgrades without having to sell off first like a piece of hardware. Luckily Yomama bought over Steinberg and did not screw it up yet

They are ceasing devt., but I hope they still continue to provide tech support. I will still be using my V2.5 occasionally just so because I have some libraries that don't convert nicely to other platforms.
Saudade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2008   #4
Gear addict
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 345

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saudade View Post
GS was required back then when RAM wasn't enough...streaming from disk was their selling point. With RAM dirt cheap and mobos and OS supporting up to 8GB, why would anyone need to stream from disk?
hmmm, maybe I am using strange libraries, but 8GB RAM, seems not enough to fit in two sampled instruments. (well, after RAMSave or something like that - yes, maybe 4).
Just look at the average size of the libraries released today and you will see that 8GB of Ram comes nowhere close to loading such libraries .....

best
steff3 is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gigastudio 4..... slaves666 Product Alerts older than 2 months 1 7th October 2007 06:12 AM
Gigastudio 96 --OS? popmann Music computers 6 5th May 2007 09:47 AM
Using GigaStudio T.O. Sterrett So much gear, so little time! 0 1st May 2006 11:25 PM
Gigastudio 3 LumenStudio Music computers 12 12th August 2004 04:45 AM
Gigastudio e-cue Music computers 1 2nd June 2002 07:13 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:24 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.