![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #241 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2003 Location: NY
Posts: 1,142
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #242 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2003 Location: NY
Posts: 1,142
| Quote:
Its very hard to read through any forum on the internet and not run into clueless comments. There is intelligence and then there is wisdom--and wisdom is sorely lacking. Some people just cant see the big picture. But even worse is Bias. I believe it is bias that causes so much stubbornness. Some people just dont want to understand because it nullifies their opinion.. The only other thing I'll say is that I disagree that plugins are not as good as hardware. Its not that absolute anymore. There are some that are better than the hardware. This was inevitable because once you achieve a one on one copy by all critical measurments(phase cancellation from the original gear)--you actually have beat the hardware due to the softwares versatility(many instances, presets, recall, ease of use). At that point you can even improve on the sonics, add features, bands, and parameters that the hardware does not have. This is where the bias comes in because some people feels threatened, or mad, that others have virtual gear that matches their higher priced hardware. But there are also many men around here wise enough and secure enough to see its their skill that truly sets them apart.. so there's nothing to fear. You cant model skill.
__________________ ATTENTION ![]() If you just used the word MUSICAL in your post... You just repeated a term, you heard from some pansy, that has absolutely no meaning. Congratulations.....Your a follower. | |
| | |
| | #243 |
| Lives for gear |
I hope Waves models a high end reverb as well (Lex 480 anyone?) So we can be done with it forever
__________________ Apogee Rosetta 200, Lexicon PCM91, DSI Evolver, Microwave XTK, Kurzweil K2661, Alesis Fusion 8HD, Yamaha TG77, Roland JD990/D550, Korg 01R/W, SCA N72s |
| | |
| | #244 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2005 Location: London
Posts: 1,956
| So true, and a aspect sorely neglected in the pointscoring stubborness of Waves v UAD v hardware debates - it just gets really petty and silly after a while. Loads of killer plugs out at the mo' and more to come... Just have at it.
__________________ . "There's no correlation between creativity and equipment ownership. None. Zilch. Nada." Hugh MacLeod ~ peace ~ |
| | |
| | #245 |
| Gear nut Joined: May 2008
Posts: 128
| |
| | |
| | #246 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2005 Location: Kansas City
Posts: 2,673
|
Ah Man I thought he said skin because I wanted that JJP skin then again mine sort of looks like is studio!
__________________ I have had worse days, but hey I've been on fire! I feel like I should make the pissed smiley my Avitar ![]() Eric Nelson |
| | |
| | #247 |
| Lives for gear | |
| | |
| | #248 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2004 Location: Boston Area
Posts: 1,268
| |
| | |
| | #249 |
| Lives for gear | |
| | |
| | #250 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2004 Location: Canuk
Posts: 5,278
| |
| | |
| | #251 |
| Lives for gear | |
| | |
| | #252 |
| Lives for gear | |
| | |
| | #253 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2007 Location: Here, There, and Everywhere.
Posts: 1,581
|
I decided to demo these plugs for the heck of it while I am demoing a bunch of other plugs (waves API, chandler, sonnox). At first glance, I didn't think this would be a very flexible bundle, but after trying them out on a couple mixes I am very impressed. I could care less how they compare to the UAD (though I totally understand why many would), I also couldn't care less wether or not they nail the hardware. I just want to love what I'm hearing... and I do. The puigtech eqs are slick. Kind of a polished sound. In contrast to the Waves API 560s, which are lean, punchy, and in your face, the JJP eqs are more refined. The puigchild... you know, the only way Waves could have done any worse with these names would be to call them the turdchild, or sploogetech, but I digress... The puigchild is sweeeeet. Loved it on guitars, vocals, drums. My fiance (who can blindly spot a neve, api, or tg preamp and told me i needed a Vox AC30HH after hearing one...oh, and a major fan of the FATSO Jr... I know, she's a-mayyy-ziiing!) was half napping half resting on the couch while I mixed with the JJP plugs. After mixing a while with them, my toughest critic gave her unsolicited approval. She agreed, having no idea and not really caring what I was using, that the mix began to sound really good. Very pleasing to the ear. Not fatiguing, pleasing. That's quite a feat for an ITB mix. last note - I pulled 5 plugs off of a rough vocal track i was trying to repair, replaced them with the JJP meq & child comp and it wasn't simply better than before, it just sounded really good.
__________________ Sugar Hill Studios |
| | |
| | #254 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
Sounds like you found the right girl! Congrats on the engagement! -SD | |
| | |
| | #255 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2007 Location: Here, There, and Everywhere.
Posts: 1,581
| |
| | |
| | #256 | ||
| Gear maniac Joined: Sep 2007 Location: New York
Posts: 186
| Quote:
Quote:
Waves has been doing great plugs for years. No, the plugs will NOT equal the 660/670/MEQ/EQP hardware. Please.
__________________ Steve Pagano SpockStudio www.SpockStudio.com "This monophonic recording is playable on monophonic and stereo phonographs. It cannot become obsolete"-- BEATLES '65 (album version) | ||
| | |
| | #257 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 209
| |
| | |
| | #258 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2006 Location: Paris, France
Posts: 1,900
| |
| | |
| | #259 | ||
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2007 Location: Here, There, and Everywhere.
Posts: 1,581
| Quote:
Quote:
I'll be trying the Sonnox EQ & Dynamics next. (fun week! ...and I'm definitely keeping my lady!) | ||
| | |
| | #260 |
| Gear interested Joined: Jan 2006 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 26
Thread Starter |
Plugins are only "emulations" of hardware and are only a "tool" to make good recordings and to give those of us who don't have access to the original hardware products emulations. I don't understand why there is always a debate on which one sounds or is better. For instance if you wanted to mix using your laptop and you need a specific type of eq or compressor you can choose the specific plugin emulation and in this instance a plugin is better I would also add people using plugins already know they will not sound exactly like hardware in the first place and the usefulness of the plugin is only relative to the user and what desired results are expected. I am glad companies such as Waves, Sony, Universal Audio and a host of others are producing great plugins emulating classic compressors, eqs and the like as tools to get better sounding recordings. It makes my life a whole lot easier. |
| | |
| | #261 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2006 Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 3,054
|
When I first gave these plugs a try, I didn't really care for them. Then as I usually do when running a new plug through it's paces, I pulled up a previous mix, stripped the plugs I used and replaced with the ones' being demo'd. With these plugs I did 2 different songs, one rock and one a ballad. The plugs were stellar on both songs. They are very, very smooth, polished. Rounding out any harshness that my have existed. I find the Waves V series to very smooth and polished as well, compared to the SSL and API bundles. I of course bought this bundle as well. After all is said and done, when is it going to stop for me? At some point, really, how many EQ's do I need?
__________________ PT9, HD2pcie, Digi 192 I/I, Lynx Auora, Digi 003, MacPro, MacBook, iPad |
| | |
| | #262 | |
| Gear Head Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 65
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #263 |
| Gear nut Joined: May 2008 Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 138
|
I'm not in any sense an expert on Fairchilds and Pultecs but I really liked what I heard when I demoed these plug-ins, and just bought them after being >so< close to buying a UAD-1 expert pak (something I've wanted for a very long time). The deal killer for me was that I've been recording at 96 KHz on my new DAW system and could see that even with 2 UAD-1 cards, I would be out of DSP before I could finish a simple mix, given the plug-ins I wanted to use (mostly the Neve bundle, Fairchilds, etc.). I easily had 12 SSL and JJP plugs going on top of another dozen or so other plug-ins at a reasonably low latency. UA is really shooting themselves in the foot with not updating there DSP platform, but I digress . . . I also found the SSL channel strip to be great on certain material, and I really like the G-Master buss compressor. Booth the JJP and SSL plug-ins seemed to reinforce a warm analog sound I 've been trying to achieve with my mixes (I'm just a songwriter/musician/home studio sort of guy - not a professional but I know what I like). Honestly, having demoed the Waves Gold bundle in the past, I was not expecting much from these plugs - I never liked the harsh sound I got from things like the L2 Maximizer and LinEQ (I may have not understood how to use them but oh well) - and the bundle prices seemed ridiculously high to me. I've been using Voxengo for several years now, and loved the sound but these new Wave plugs are above and beyond what I've ever used before. Really nice stuff. |
| | |
| | #264 |
| Lives for gear |
The difference that I've noticed with the UAD emulations compared to real analogue is that they have some of the character that analogue devices have, that I miss with other plug-ins emulations. Even if they don't sound identical that is enough for me. I think that the essential aspect that UAD-1 plug-ins manage to capture is the 'vibe' of some of the older equipment. In our studio we have real Pultecs, Neves, and a few vari-mu compressors but not the 670. In a mix situation I'd happily use UAD. For mastering that tiny difference is enough to use the hardware. But the difference is getting remarkably smaller- plug-ins have really come a long way. Big fan of Waves as well, especially the renascence series.
__________________ Studios 301 |
| | |
| | #265 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 209
| Or those of us that just don't want to use the hardware, hardware can be a pain in the ass, I love working with plugins because I can do several different mixes easily with instant recall, which allows me to be much more experimental, and anyway the quality of many plugins are just as high quality as the hardware, maybe not an exact replica, but just as relevant.
|
| | |
| | #266 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2004 Location: Hamburg
Posts: 1,222
| |
| | |
| | #267 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2007 Location: Here, There, and Everywhere.
Posts: 1,581
|
I tried to match the Puitech and Puigchild with my URS CSP and had great results. I was looking to purchase the JJP collection and the PSP Vintage Warmer, but I found I could get way too close with the CSP to justify the purchase. In fact, with the exception of the Puigtech, I actually preferred the CSP everytime. The Puigtech had a subtle sheen I could get close to, but not nail with the CSP. However, I think the waves API trounces the CSP 1967 models. |
| | |
| | #268 |
| Moderator Joined: Feb 2004 Location: Boston,MA Providence,RI
Posts: 15,921
| Probably because the way the Q changes on the Waves API, whereas you have to do it manually on the CSP. If you use a wide Q at low boost, and bring it narrower as you boost with the CSP you can get similar results, but the fact that it happens as you turn the knob with the Waves makes it much easier to use.
__________________ Tony Belmont ![]() We Sell Gear! ![]() High Profile Audio.....PluginDiscounts.com I may on occasion talk about some of the products I am a dealer for in my posts.. and that's OK! I sell them because I like them. Not vice versa. It's more fun to talk about things you know and love, then things you don't. |
| | |
| | #269 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2007 Location: Here, There, and Everywhere.
Posts: 1,581
| Quote:
I do however prefer the over all color of the Waves API plugs. Just instantiating one affects the sound in a really positive way. | |
| | |
| | #270 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2006 Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 3,054
|
I’ve read a lot of hype on the URS Channel Strip Pro. So, I demo’d it last week. I have to say, I just don’t get it. I found the lows to be muffled and the high’s to be harsh, regardless of which emulation I was using. I had read that the compressor part of the channel strip was as good as UAD’s LA2A and 1176, although the compressor was decent, it was nowhere near the UAD. I had hoped it would be a really great plug, if I had liked it, I was going to buy the TDM version for tracking purposes, not only did I not find the love, I didn’t find the like. I can actually say this about URS plugs in general, I’m just not a fan really with all the other options out there. |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WAVES JJP presets | theom | Music computers | 0 | 6th May 2008 04:02 AM |
| Waves Studio Classics Collection -- in stores?? | kirkbross | Product Alerts older than 2 months | 28 | 11th February 2008 10:35 AM |
| WAVES: Studio Classics Collection | John_McEnroe | Product Alerts older than 2 months | 3 | 20th January 2008 07:19 PM |
| What happened to the 'WAVES The Waves SSL 4000 Collection on WEB SITE!!!' thread? | theother | Music computers | 15 | 9th February 2006 10:34 AM |
| |