WAVES Introducing the JJP collection - Page 8 - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > News > New Product Alert! > Product Alerts older than 2 months


WAVES Introducing the JJP collection

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 17th June 2008   #211
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: mexico
Posts: 4,959

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duardo View Post
If that day comes...which may happen, but may not...hardware (other than preamps, of course) really may not be necessary for tracking.
true, but hell the pultecs look better in the rack than plugs don't they? anyway while that day arrives or not, i'm sure digging outboard. i really don't doubt that day will arrive, it's pretty dang close now, but i'm pretty sure i'll still be keeping my outboard; specially pres and MICS, and maybe some comps... and maybe...

whatever, but back on topic, plugs are great too. wouldn't want o be without them.
raal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2008   #212
Lives for gear
 
DaveC's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 640

Quote:
I'd really like to hear some comparisons with Waves vs UAD
I'd REALLY like to hear some comparisons with Waves vs Bombfactory.
The API bundle they made is really nice, especially the 2500-compressor,
but I seriously doubt that Waves is capable to emulate tube eq's and comps,
that's why I wonder how much better the Waves' version of the Fairchild and Pultec is compared to the Bombfactory's, UAD, or any version.
It sounds like a remix of a remix...
__________________
http://www.davidclarkson.nl
DaveC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2008   #213
Gear nut
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 108

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJunk View Post
I'd really like to hear some comparisons with Waves vs UAD.
me too...
danielbest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008   #214
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1

Thumbs down

No way are they as good as my UAD vesion's, I really spent some time comparing them, two of the most classic outboard and they get a producer to endorse them? (horrible big red name on the GUI) cos they borrowed his machines, they probably been modded or updated, they don't sound as they should to me. There isn't the same weight at the bottom and the high's are not as smooth on the Puigtec as the UAD.

Really dissapointed as they didn't need this guy to promote such great peices of hardware, plus they aren't as good as the UAD.

I mean the name puigchild & puigtec is superbad..
badgerman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008   #215
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: mexico
Posts: 4,959

haven't seen anyone say they've compared their UADs to the real thing... anyone? if this question is OT just ignore it. thanks.
raal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008   #216
Lives for gear
 
theblotted's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,304

Quote:
Originally Posted by badgerman View Post
here isn't the same weight at the bottom and the high's are not as smooth on the Puigtec as the UAD.

.

i've definitely noticed that the PuigChild has some sort of roll-off at the bottom end.

putting it on a 2bus, and switch it in and out. pretty obvious actually.
__________________
"You can imagine where it goes from here."
"He fixes the cable?"
theblotted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008   #217
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,462

Quote:
Originally Posted by badgerman View Post
There isn't the same weight at the bottom and the high's are not as smooth on the Puigtec as the UAD.
haven't tried the waves. but i would never call the uad pultec smooth in the highs.
compared to newer software eqs it actually sounds really harsh and brittle to my ears.
salomonander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008   #218
Lives for gear
 
gainreduction's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,377

Quote:
Originally Posted by theblotted View Post
i've definitely noticed that the PuigChild has some sort of roll-off at the bottom end.

putting it on a 2bus, and switch it in and out. pretty obvious actually.
If I´m not mistaken that happens with the hardware too.

Please correct me if I´m wrong about that.
gainreduction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008   #219
Lives for gear
 
World Studios's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: Malmö, Sweden
Posts: 861

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveC View Post
I'd REALLY like to hear some comparisons with Waves vs Bombfactory.
The API bundle they made is really nice, especially the 2500-compressor,
but I seriously doubt that Waves is capable to emulate tube eq's and comps,
that's why I wonder how much better the Waves' version of the Fairchild and Pultec is compared to the Bombfactory's, UAD, or any version.
It sounds like a remix of a remix...
I posted a quick comparison between the Bomb Factory and Waves Pultecs earlier in this thread. Check it out! I compared the EQ's. I don't have the BF Fairchild...
__________________
Johan Bejerholm
World Studios
Malmö, Sweden

www.worldstudios.se
World Studios is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008   #220
Lives for gear
 
Tube World's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Franklin TN
Posts: 2,401

Quote:
Originally Posted by manthe View Post
This looks interesting but, I just have to step in with my opinion (since a lot of others have).

Demoing Waves V series against UAD-1 Neve stuff let me somewhat unimpressed with the Waves offering, given what they want to charge for them. That isn't to say they sounded or performed badly. But, for that money I expected them to be as good as, or better than UAD's. IMO, they were not. Whether or not they were attempting to emulate the same hardware is not germane to my opinion. I just thought it clearly did not sound as good.

I also did not think their SSL emulations stood up to the Duende (by a greater margin, IMO). Once again, I realize they are meant to emulate different hardware. It was still a matter of one just plain-ol' sounding better than the other. In this case, I REALLY wanted the Waves stuff to be better. It would have saved me almost $900!

One last thing. I think people SEVERELY underestimate the effectiveness of DSP processing. I have 4 UAD-1 cards and a Duende classic. I can do HUGE ITB mixes on my Core 2 Quad with 4GB of RAM without batting an eyelid! The offboard DSP processing is extremely effective and very welcome.

I was mixing a very poorly tracked song the other day. I was on a tight budget. I had to move quickly and stay ITB. Between my 2 systems I had 41 plugins instantiated. I still had plenty of DSP power to spare and my native CPU(s) were at an aggregate 12%!

I'm not a Waves hater/basher. I also am jealous of those who get these free! That is great customer loyaltly, IMO. I am going to demo them all the same
You might have liked the UAD Waves "sound" better, but I saw the video with Eddie Kramer where he A/B the real and Waves V Series and he and I were impressed. The Waves SSL is modeling a different SSL console compared to the Duende plug ins so of course they will sound different. I was told the UAD Neve plug ins suck up so much power on a DSP card that it's a joke. If you have 4 UAD cards, I am sure i'ts not a problem, but hey what ever works for you.
Tube World is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008   #221
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,192

Quote:
Originally Posted by raal View Post
haven't seen anyone say they've compared their UADs to the real thing... anyone? if this question is OT just ignore it. thanks.
i did read studies on 1176 hard and software (german only)
some guys from sweden started a thread on their results from their study

once i got through the german comparison it was easier for me to understand
how to get the hardwares sound i was looking for from the plugin

was the only way to make me happy using the emus since i missed
the sound of the hardware
lllubi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008   #222
Lives for gear
 
Tube World's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Franklin TN
Posts: 2,401

Quote:
Originally Posted by badgerman View Post
No way are they as good as my UAD vesion's, I really spent some time comparing them, two of the most classic outboard and they get a producer to endorse them? (horrible big red name on the GUI) cos they borrowed his machines, they probably been modded or updated, they don't sound as they should to me. There isn't the same weight at the bottom and the high's are not as smooth on the Puigtec as the UAD.

Really dissapointed as they didn't need this guy to promote such great peices of hardware, plus they aren't as good as the UAD.

I mean the name puigchild & puigtec is superbad..
If you expected the Waves to sound the same as the UAD, of course you will be disapointed. The Waves sounds like this guys hardware gear. To the best of my knowledge they were not modified. As we all know, one Fairchild will not sound the same as another Fairchild as well. When you say it does not sound as they should.....have you ever heard a real Pultec or Fairchild? Don't use the UAD modeling as the real McCoy for Waves to copy. It could be that UAD does not sound like the real thing. I really can't answer that because I never heard a real Fairchild or Pultec. I do like the way the UAD Pultec sounds though. The Fairchild by UAD I was never crazy about. It took too much away from the low end. It sounds ok on a drum bus but that's about it.
Tube World is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008   #223
Lives for gear
 
zboy2854's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 7,941

So after pages and pages in this thread, what have learned here kids?

The Waves plugs sound better than the UAD plugs.

The UAD plugs sound better than the Waves plugs.

The Waves plugs sound like the hardware they're modeled after.

The Waves plugs don't sound like the hardware they're modeled after.

The highs on the UAD Pultec are smooth.

The highs on the UAD Pultec are brittle.

LMAO. In the end, all this confirms is that you gotta use your own ears and see if the tools work for you personally. If they do, great. If not, great. Use Waves. Use UAD. Use hardware. Use none of the above. Whatever gets you through the mix.
__________________
What the wise man does in the beginning, fools do in the end.
--Warren Buffett

The four most expensive words in the English language are: "This time it's different."
--John Marks Templeton
zboy2854 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2008   #224
Lives for gear
 
elmolemon's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 672

Word!
elmolemon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2008   #225
Lives for gear
 
s0nguy's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 938

Quote:
Originally Posted by zboy2854 View Post
So after pages and pages in this thread, what have learned here kids?

The Waves plugs sound better than the UAD plugs.

The UAD plugs sound better than the Waves plugs.

The Waves plugs sound like the hardware they're modeled after.

The Waves plugs don't sound like the hardware they're modeled after.

The highs on the UAD Pultec are smooth.

The highs on the UAD Pultec are brittle.

LMAO. In the end, all this confirms is that you gotta use your own ears and see if the tools work for you personally. If they do, great. If not, great. Use Waves. Use UAD. Use hardware. Use none of the above. Whatever gets you through the mix.

well said...

-s0nguy
s0nguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2008   #226
Lives for gear
 
jumpnyc's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 876

FWIW

They're pretty cool. Can I use them? - definitely. Am I glad I got them free with Mercury? - Yes! Are they the be all end all? Not sure. It will take some months of deciding to use them and seeing the results to determine that for me, anyway
jumpnyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2008   #227
Lives for gear
 
DAWgEAR's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,174

Quote:
Originally Posted by WavesCS View Post
Hello again everyone,

This has already been discussed earlier in this thread
here

Version 6 will have the license transfer and other iLok.com features we have all been wanting for some time.

__________________
All the best,

Tim Holbert
Waves Customer Support
Tim,

Will version 6 provide APA44/32 support again? Expanded APA support?

Prior to 5.9.7, no netshell support has been added since circa 2005: SSL, API, VSeries have not been supported.

Since 5.9.7. no waves plugins are supported.
__________________
" the wrist of the listener will always turn up the volume for you more effectively than any brick wall compression ever could." -- Stav from Mixing With Your Mind
DAWgEAR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2008   #228
Gear Head
 
WavesCS's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 33

We have been working on continued support for APA. A short time after launch of 6.0 there will be resumed support for APA. However we do not have an ETA at this time.

Keep an eye on waves.com and the Waves Newsletter for updates on this.
__________________
Best Regards,

Waves Customer Support
WavesCS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2008   #229
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 671

Quote:
Originally Posted by WavesCS View Post
We have been working on continued support for APA. A short time after launch of 6.0 there will be resumed support for APA. However we do not have an ETA at this time.

Keep an eye on waves.com and the Waves Newsletter for updates on this.
How about the question about better ICON support for V-Series/API??


Thanks,
Peter
lydpik is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2008   #230
Lives for gear
 
AMIEL's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: Miami, Fl
Posts: 3,615

Send a message via AIM to AMIEL Send a message via MSN to AMIEL Send a message via Yahoo to AMIEL
Quote:
Originally Posted by epp View Post
It's not an insight, it's an opinion.

But I can't for the life of me get this poor-man's-hardware software philosophy of late, plugs sound nothing like hardware- any person who's not a complete and utter fool knows that.

A few years ago waves and others would come up with genuine innovations, and processes you can not do with analog hardware, like their linear phase designs, convolution FX, dynamic 'tool-kit' processors and maxxbass etc. At that time they brought something new to the table.

Who could give a turd about a PUIGtec? ****in hell.
In reality if you want to sound like JJP or any other Top mixer you do not need the JJP Waves or even his real Pultecs or Fairchilds or any other plug in or hardware , you need to think and feel the music in a similar manner, you need to have the experience, taste and also the quality products he receive to be mixed...regardless and even with the wonderful gear JJP have as his disposal he will still sound JJP with RNC,DBX,Mackie 8 Bus and any other low budget Harware gear or just mixing ITB.

The point here is to try to emulate some great hardware gear that YOU may feel helps to make your work sounds better....reagardless most of people never used or heard the sound of a Pultec or Fairchild in their hands...so really is kind of obsolete if the emulation is 60-100% accurate, as long you feel sounds great and give you a sound you really like and that you feel will enhance your sound , then all is great!
Anyway in these days you may find more and more people using plug ins..even the die hard analog guys...and think about this: if JJP really love and uses his few Real Pultecs and Fairchilds..Don`t you think if he have now a plug in that emulate the essence of that wonderful hardware that he love so much...that JJP will use many intances of this Plug in in his mixes?
__________________
------------------


Peace.

Reuven Amiel


"There are no rules, just knowledge, good taste and experimentation"

"Music was designed to escape from reality for a moment, not to magnify our fears and problems"
AMIEL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2008   #231
Lives for gear
 
indie's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: C-ville area VA
Posts: 1,618

I just bought them. My demo ran out while recalling a mix. I tried to emulate with various plugs.... nope, couldn't do it. Had to buy.

Tony Belmont is good people.
__________________
rock on,
Micah
http://www.micahmixer.com
indie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2008   #232
Moderator
 
TonyBelmont's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: Boston,MA Providence,RI
Posts: 15,921

Quote:
Originally Posted by indie View Post
Tony Belmont is good people.
TonyBelmont is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2008   #233
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 671

Quote:
Originally Posted by AMIEL View Post
In reality if you want to sound like JJP or any other Top mixer you do not need the JJP Waves or even his real Pultecs or Fairchilds or any other plug in or hardware , you need to think and feel the music in a similar manner, you need to have the experience, taste and also the quality products he receive to be mixed...regardless and even with the wonderful gear JJP have as his disposal he will still sound JJP with RNC,DBX,Mackie 8 Bus and any other low budget Harware gear or just mixing ITB.

The point here is to try to emulate some great hardware gear that YOU may feel helps to make your work sounds better....reagardless most of people never used or heard the sound of a Pultec or Fairchild in their hands...so really is kind of obsolete if the emulation is 60-100% accurate, as long you feel sounds great and give you a sound you really like and that you feel will enhance your sound , then all is great!
Anyway in these days you may find more and more people using plug ins..even the die hard analog guys...and think about this: if JJP really love and uses his few Real Pultecs and Fairchilds..Don`t you think if he have now a plug in that emulate the essence of that wonderful hardware that he love so much...that JJP will use many intances of this Plug in in his mixes?

You said it!!
lydpik is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2008   #234
Gear nut
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 139

Does anyone noticed the delayed reverb on JJP's voice (during the interview)???
So I guess that's the PuigVerb?
pedrodash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2008   #235
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,192

Quote:
Originally Posted by pedrodash View Post
Does anyone noticed the delayed reverb on JJP's voice (during the interview)???
So I guess that's the PuigVerb?
thought it is his room
did like it very much
lllubi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2008   #236
Lives for gear
 
ddageek's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 2,673

Quote:
Originally Posted by epp View Post
Jesus, what a lame idea for a product.
Ok for you maybe, but for a lot of us this great. Epp you may have a studio with all the great analog gear in great condition but that would mean you are camped out at some place like Blackbird or Oceanway ( I doubt it) some of us have had the privilege to use soe good examples of this most often modeled gear and you know what? We like some of these plugins! Why? Simple we have also seen and heard some really bad examples of the sam that someone has spent way to much money on!
Now some of us talk on a regularl basis to people who still work in highend rooms on a day to day basis, guess what alot of these guys reach for the plugin! Why because they know exactly what it will do! (How many times have you reached for that old neve module or clone thinking perfect than fought with it because it jut won't do what a 108 is supposed to do?)
Now I use plugins for a couple of simple reasons
1 I and my clients can't afford the real deal yeah I know people at API/ATI/Arsenal, Yeah I own a couple of 560s which I think are a bargain but I can't afford 16 plus a bunch of 550s and comps, but for the price of one 560 I can get the bundle whic comes pretty freakin close!, Yeah I could print tracks 2 at a time thorough my 560s but my clients cant afford the time!
My clients are a simple mixture of non-for profits and guys who got suckered in to thinking tey could record and mix them selves by the GCs of this world (stuff still comes in on ADAT and DA88)!
2 I have a kid yeah that eats the gear budget and multiplies the repair budget cuts the time and makes recall the Holy grail!

So learn to think before you spout something so arrogant and stupid!
__________________
I have had worse days, but hey I've been on fire!

I feel like I should make the pissed smiley my Avitar

Eric Nelson
ddageek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2008   #237
Lives for gear
 
ddageek's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 2,673

Quote:
Originally Posted by WavesCS View Post
Hello again everyone,

This has already been discussed earlier in this thread
here

Version 6 will have the license transfer and other iLok.com features we have all been wanting for some time.

__________________
All the best,

Tim Holbert
Waves Customer Support
Tim the world needs a great LA2 and 1176 emulation that can be used without dedicated hardware and on multiple platforms!!!
ddageek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2008   #238
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 3,054

If you guys could just emulate UAD's emulation of the LA-2a and 1176 I'd be happy.
__________________
PT9, HD2pcie, Digi 192 I/I, Lynx Auora, Digi 003, MacPro, MacBook, iPad
barryjohns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2008   #239
Lives for gear
 
Dusty Angel's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,037

Quote:
Originally Posted by ddageek View Post
Tim the world needs a great LA2 and 1176 emulation that can be used without dedicated hardware and on multiple platforms!!!

yes "Waves - The Vintage Compressor Collection"

feat.
1176 black face
1176 blue strip
LA2A
LA3A

thumbsup
Dusty Angel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2008   #240
Gear nut
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 139

Quote:
Originally Posted by lllubi View Post
thought it is his room
did like it very much
I wouldn't like it in my control room
pedrodash is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
WAVES JJP presets theom Music computers 0 6th May 2008 04:02 AM
Waves Studio Classics Collection -- in stores?? kirkbross Product Alerts older than 2 months 28 11th February 2008 10:35 AM
WAVES: Studio Classics Collection John_McEnroe Product Alerts older than 2 months 3 20th January 2008 07:19 PM
What happened to the 'WAVES The Waves SSL 4000 Collection on WEB SITE!!!' thread? theother Music computers 15 9th February 2006 10:34 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:23 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.