Login / Register
 
Protools 10 vs HDX?
New Reply
Subscribe
phillipc421
Thread Starter
#1
21st February 2012
Old 21st February 2012
  #1
Gear maniac
 
phillipc421's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 298

Thread Starter
phillipc421 is offline
Protools 10 vs HDX?

What are the main reasons for going HDX over normal pro tools 10 with a good interface?
#2
22nd February 2012
Old 22nd February 2012
  #2
70% Coffee, 30% Beer
 
Doc Mixwell's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Location: Quincy, MA
Posts: 10,041

Send a message via Skype™ to Doc Mixwell
Doc Mixwell is offline
HDX is a system that includes the interface as part of the equation. It is as if, you have the power of a large computer, inside your large computer, running Pro Tools and its processing. HDX gives you a direct connection to Avid HD Interfaces, up to 64 I/o per card, for bullet proof integration with the software's frame. It has extremely low latency and the Avid interfaces also have extremely low residual latency. The HDX card has a Cache of DSP Accelerated power for the Pro Tools Environment and background tasks are handled by the DSP on the card, and not your computer. It also has a Cache of DSP for AAX-DSP Plug ins. It is a Scalable Core Card System, and as you add more HDX cards, you add more DSP Power, and more I/O capabilities with HD Interfacing.
__________________
Adam J. Brass
DSPdoctor.com



__________________
If you enjoy reading my posts, please consider working with me and my shop DSPdoctor on your next studio upgrade

adam@dspdoctor.com

My Personal Web Page
#3
2nd April 2012
Old 2nd April 2012
  #3
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: Zurich
Posts: 1,294

MarkyGoldstein is offline
I think only Protools HDX has ultra low latency with fx on input channels. Protools HDX has a bussing system from the input to the processing units to the outputs.

All other solutions are compromises in some way. Normally some audio gets routed to the Intel processor and that's the bottleneck. Intel never built those system designs for pro audio purposes, unfortunately.

Apple should talk to Intel and improve this situation fundamentally. Every iTV needs 0.7 ms analog to analog processing with FX in the near future ;-)
New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn  Submit Thread to Google+ Google+ 
 
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter / Forum
Replies
tigermuzik / Post Production forum!
4
ericdevine / So much gear, so little time!
2
Dopamine / Music Computers
0
Tone Obsessed / So much gear, so little time!
170

Forum Jump

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.