![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #31 | |
| Gear Head Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 63
| Quote:
, right now don't buy anything, especially if you already have TDM, why buy HDX only to wait for developers to recode all of the plugins that you already have, and for a card that is no more powerful than an HD5 system that a lot of users already have. Check out the last avid webinar, even they made it pretty clear that waiting and planning your investment is the best thing to do, the three year window that Avid says they will service TDM systems is an excellent indicator of how long it's gonna take HDX to get sorted out. | |
| | |
| | #32 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,673
|
I've been checking prices of the HD core card. Still a little high IMO for a card that won't be supported in the next PT release, but if they go below $1000, I would certainly consider it. HD native is actually working very well for me though.
|
| | |
| | #33 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2004 Location: Boca Raton FL
Posts: 3,955
Thread Starter | Quote:
![]() But a lot of users have HD2 and 3, which this card would surpass. And my bet is that HDX is going to be full of AAX plug ins long before 3 years. Three years is simply a courtesy to the user base for the now extinct TDM platform, that's all. JMHO. | |
| | |
| | #34 |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2004 Location: Boca Raton FL
Posts: 3,955
Thread Starter | Yep. Still high for something dead in the water.
|
| | |
| | #35 | |
| Gear Head Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 63
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #36 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2004 Location: Boca Raton FL
Posts: 3,955
Thread Starter | Quote:
![]() If future versions of PT supported TDM it might not be a bad idea, but now that they have announced that they won't, it scares me too much to invest, especially since I'm not one with a lot of TDM plugs hanging around, so I'd have to buy those too. TH | |
| | |
| | #37 | |
| Gear Head Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 63
| Quote:
I hear you, and I agree , but what if someone pays you to type that letter?!!Seriously though, you should weigh your investment very carefully, if I didnt already have TDM, I doubt that I would invest any substantial amount of money in it now. I think you should hold off a minute, Apple just announced Snow Lion for the summer, which usually means a new mac now thats what I'm interested in, the next mac with a Apogee Symphony I/O, Native PT11, Logic and Studio One, then I'll grab an HDX (when needed), and I'm done till 2020 | |
| | |
| | #38 |
| Gear addict Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 450
|
hey serious...IMHO...please do yourself a favour and don't get sucked into Apogee Logic land as a system...as pieces of a solid system, they are great...like using logic to write and apogee for conversion is great...but relying on that AS your system is asking of heaps of trouble...especially when you are used to an HD situation...really just thought I'd encourage you not to do that...I wasted a year (at least) chasing that dragon's tail...
|
| | |
| | #39 | |
| Gear Head Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 63
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #40 |
| Gear addict Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 450
|
They are two different animals...until somebody basically makes a card as intensive as HD (X)...or an external system (DSP) that can handle 100 times what firewire and USB can...then we're talking about the same thing...but that won't be native will it...it'll just be dedicated DSP in another form...there is a reason that DSP boxes are coming back...but yeah...cool good luck!
|
| | |
| | #41 |
| Good Listener Joined: Jan 2006 Location: Orlando
Posts: 411
|
I built my own quad core PC and put a HD3 PCIx in there after my G5 died. Excellent system, reliable, fast. Added 192s until I had the 48 outs I wanted to the console. Sounds really good, and everything just works, I can focus on the music. HDX solves problems I don't have yet. YMMV.
|
| | |
| | #42 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2004 Location: Boca Raton FL
Posts: 3,955
Thread Starter | Quote:
Symphony when they are HDX compatible, then sell the "free interface" that comes with the HDX card? | |
| | |
| | #43 | |
| Gear Head Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 63
| Quote:
Something that has'nt been mentioned much is the fact that if you are in the studio business today, or even if you're just a creative person collaborating with producers & writers, a lot of producers are creating records on laptops in native (often logic), and as a mix engineer it can sometimes be a problem to transfer a song from logic to protools for example and keep the same vibe, a lot of producers can get the record sounding pretty good on the laptop, with only some polish needed. Thats why I think a DSP, along with a good native system is the new standard for a pro production room. | |
| | |
| | #44 |
| Gear addict Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 450
| |
| | |
| | #45 | |
| Gear maniac Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 150
| Quote:
HDX Faster / more stable / intense power / totally mind blowing. | |
| | |
| | #46 | |
| Gear Head Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 63
| Quote:
But for a lot of us who already have TDM rigs with all of our DSP plugins in place, apogee, benchmark converters etc.. hardware inserts setup, clients who are paying for our services, there are still no real valid reasons to spend the cash on HDX right now, just to wait for the same plugins we already have to be ported etc... (If money is no object, thats a different story of course, but it still wont get you any new DSP plugins today), Also current TDM users will not miss out on anything as far as features go since we can turn on the HD Native engine anytime we want (providing you have any 3rd party i/o or even the headphone output from your computer just to check out the features) of PT10 Native. Its just a big waiting game for HDX the way I see it, we're talking two years easy to even see which developers are really going to port HDX DSP, this year will be a native affair for the most part, 2013 I expect to see the new DSP offerings begin to appear, (now, I hope I'm wrong and DSP plugs show up this year) but 3rd party developers are basically all saying native first, then DSP sometime after, and not many people will believe anything that Avid says until they rebuild the trust of their customers which is going to take a minute. Lastly the new & next generation of producers, engineers and artists are primarily working in the native format, Logic, Studio One, Reaper, Fruity Loops,Reason,Cubase and now finally Protools. 32bit float and it all sounds great, and a lot of it sounds amazing by todays standard. My strong suggestion to current HD2-3-4-5-or 6 users is to bite the bullet and figure out a way to get into PT10HD if you havent already. (not HD 7 to 10 though for $2500, thats just crazy!! )I know a lot of you are pissed at Avids upgrade prices, and rightfully so, but 10HD is worth it (if you can find a less expensive way in ) even if you never by another PT update. You can run it in native, and get a really nice 3rd party converter, and I'm telling you its gonna sound great, plus you can use all the plugs you already have, you'll have the best of both worlds, just don't listen to the people who say your system is a dinosaur, unless its your clients!! Track in TDM (no latency) and mix in native if you like, use disc cache, 32 float and hold on to your cash for now. If after this year Avid hasnt convinced you to stay on board, or go HDX, invest in a native alternative, for me it would be PT Native & Studio One and a 12 core or better mac. Ok Back To Work | |
| | |
| | #47 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2004 Location: Canuk
Posts: 5,278
| |
| | |
| | #48 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2002 Location: MAINE
Posts: 786
| Quote:
I think that's good to go for a couple of years at least. Just upgrade to a faster mac or buy a couple accel cards and you're good to go. I had a $3k or so in tdm plugs but why would you have to buy tdm plugs? Just buy the aax plugs. Most of the used tdm plugs are pretty cheap now though. JMO but unless you do 100+ tracks and need 50 plugs on each track the pcie and old macs are a pretty decent investment. I bet you could buy a used tdm system now and work with it for a year and buy a used hdx card after that and still come out on top money wise? Pt 10 is the best Protools that we've ever had so, it's all good! | |
| | |
| | #49 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2006 Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 3,054
|
It all depends on what we will see n PT11 and PT12, I'm will to bet that PT11 will be impressive and PT12 over the top, AVID has to end up this way to force folks into the newer gear, otherwise, if it is not seriously compelling, there is not much for the typical user to make a person who owns TDM today to move to HDX, the heavy duty studios, it's already compelling. I don't think that the average TDM user today needs HDX today, but I may be wrong. For my work, there is nothing compelling to me to move to HDX, interesting, but not compelling.
__________________ PT9, HD2pcie, Digi 192 I/I, Lynx Auora, Digi 003, MacPro, MacBook, iPad |
| | |
| | #50 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2002 Location: MAINE
Posts: 786
|
One thing we know for sure is that an hdx system(mac pro, hdxcore, and 8*8*8 and Protools 10 is more powerful and about twice as expensive as a used mac pro, 192 and pcie core with pt10. The HDx also does not run TDM plugs. I don't think the cost matters if you need that kind of system and can make it pay for itself. I'll wager that in my area I can make just as much money with a pcie system though. I'd bet thats true in most areas. Let's say that in 3 years time that my pcie system is worth nothing. So what's the Hdx system worth in 3 years? Half? If you've been having a good time and been productive does it matter? If I remember right I paid about 10K for HD1 and a 192 back in 2002 and the HDx system is a bit more but it's what 8(10?) times more powerful? ![]() I'd say get the system you need and start having fun! |
| | |
| | #51 | |
| Gear maniac Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 150
| Quote:
total upgrade cost - $2800.00. So If I wait for 3 years and put up with no ability to upgrade top PT 11 I highly doubt HDX cards will be selling for $3400 in 3 years - But just say you are correct that is still $600 more than what I paid for an HDX card today. | |
| | |
| | #52 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2004 Location: Boca Raton FL
Posts: 3,955
Thread Starter | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #53 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2002 Location: MAINE
Posts: 786
| Quote:
I believe I can run a wider array of plugs than an HDx system as I can run tdm plugs. Not all of the tdm plugs are available for hdx. And you need a newer computer to run HDx. The peeps that say, I don't care about the tdm plugs have either not heard them or not paid for them. Yes some plugs are coming out like eventide factory, but unless you already had the tdm plug, you had to pay for it. I saved $150 as I already bought it in 2006, it works fine on my 2012 tdm pcie system, no charge. You paid $6800 for just the card which is at least $2200 more than I paid for my whole system, which is fine if that is what you need. The native card guys think we're nuts! | |
| | |
| | #54 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2002 Location: MAINE
Posts: 786
| Quote:
People are acting like TDM Plugs are all replicated in Hdx or Native, I don't thing either are there yet. Native will not do Tdm, heat, nor no tom foolery when it comes to tracking bands. HDx is twice the money of PCIe and will not do the plugs that pcie will do right now. HDX is fine if you have the money and have outboard fx. | |
| | |
| | #55 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2004 Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 1,639
|
How loud are the fans on the magma chassis units? Can one go pcix to a pcie Mac with PT 10? Is there much additional latency when using a magma chassis? Thanks!! Dor |
| | |
| | #56 |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2007 Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Posts: 530
|
You can swap out the psu on the magma supplies to make them very quiet. Quite cheap to do too
|
| | |
| | #57 | |
| Gear Head Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 39
| Quote:
I'm using PT10 + Avid I/O and a Magma PCIX to PCIE with 1 core and 5 Accel cards. It's a smokin system! No latency whatsoever and no complaints whatsoever. It's nice to finally never run out of DSP. | |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What are some of your favorite live recordings and/or Broadcasts? | Remoteness | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 62 | 10th April 2009 12:33 AM |
| Anyone know what Rudy Van Gelder is recording with ? | Tubelover | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 17 | 30th June 2007 02:55 PM |
| Getting my story straight on Protools (Mix) | UnDeFiNeD | So much gear, so little time! | 6 | 2nd June 2007 03:53 AM |
| iLok connector getting iffy... | AlexLakis | Music computers | 4 | 18th April 2007 06:11 PM |
| TDM vs RTAS | Bassline | So much gear, so little time! | 2 | 30th January 2007 05:02 AM |
| |