My Take on Pro Tools HD 10 so Far - Garbage. - Page 4

oceantracks · 2 Weeks Ago

Quote:

Originally Posted by jonathan jetter

HD Native works really well over here.

only problem is when i'm running a lot of instances of Autotune 7 (like on a pop or R+B song with a bunch of vocal parts, each tripled).

then i get all sorts of 9092, 9094 errors, even at higher buffer sizes.

Yep, PT does NOT like AT. I can add a bunch of them in Logic but not in AvidLand.

psycho_monkey · 2 Weeks Ago

Quote:

Originally Posted by jonathan jetter

HD Native works really well over here.

only problem is when i'm running a lot of instances of Autotune 7 (like on a pop or R+B song with a bunch of vocal parts, each tripled).

then i get all sorts of 9092, 9094 errors, even at higher buffer sizes.

+1. I get "pro tools is critically low on memory" after 9-10 instances. Can't even run more than 2-3 of at7, that's just using at6).

Antares need to get their aax on, since they've never managed to sort this issue!

UnderTow · 2 Weeks Ago

Doesn't AT 7 have large latency? And isn't there a low-latency mode? I ask because I notice that if I run Ozone 5 (large latency) it uses a lot of CPU. If I then load another Ozone 5 in parallel, (doing the same processing) it doesn't use much more CPU. If I add one in series, again a huge extra CPU hit. In other words, if the total plugin latency increases by much, it causes a huge CPU hit. If it doesn't increase the latency, it doesn't have nearly as much of a CPU load.

PS: The same applies to a few other plugins. It seems like PT doesn't like plugin latency.

Alistair

KevWind · 2 Days Ago

Where did the OP go

cut · 13 Hours Ago

Quote:

Originally Posted by psycho_monkey

+1. I get "pro tools is critically low on memory" after 9-10 instances. Can't even run more than 2-3 of at7, that's just using at6).

Antares need to get their aax on, since they've never managed to sort this issue!

If you are using graph mode, it stores all the tuning info in RAM, so the more instances used in graph mode - the more RAM.

2 Weeks Ago	#93
UnderTow Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2006 Location: the Netherlands Posts: 3,953	Doesn't AT 7 have large latency? And isn't there a low-latency mode? I ask because I notice that if I run Ozone 5 (large latency) it uses a lot of CPU. If I then load another Ozone 5 in parallel, (doing the same processing) it doesn't use much more CPU. If I add one in series, again a huge extra CPU hit. In other words, if the total plugin latency increases by much, it causes a huge CPU hit. If it doesn't increase the latency, it doesn't have nearly as much of a CPU load. PS: The same applies to a few other plugins. It seems like PT doesn't like plugin latency. Alistair __________________ Alistair Johnston - TV & Film Post, Mastering, Sound Design -- "The first principle is that you must not fool yourself -- and you are the easiest person to fool" -- Richard P. Feynman "There's a sucker born every minute" -- P.T. Barnum

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
In Response to Pro Tools HD 10 Feedback	Max G	Pro Tools 10 + HDX	314	13th January 2012 01:42 AM
Pro Tools HD 10 w/ 3rd party interface	dusty cooper	Pro Tools 10 + HDX	3	29th October 2011 01:28 PM
Why do you need/use Pro Tools HD?	nativeaudio	High end	114	24th January 2011 02:03 PM
What would you want in Pro tools HD 10?	IM WHO YOU THINK	Music computers	27	14th November 2010 06:27 PM

2 Days Ago	#94
KevWind Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2006 Location: Wyoming .. The Rim Posts: 1,460	Where did the OP go