Updates on broadcasting loudness standards, March 2013 - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Post Production forum!

Updates on broadcasting loudness standards, March 2013
Topic: New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 17th March 2013   #1
Dies for gear
 
danijel's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Posts: 1,961
My Recordings/Credits

Thread Starter
Updates on broadcasting loudness standards, March 2013

Hi everyone,

I want to do a good update to the 'mixing levels' sticky here, so I'd like to hear from the guys outside of the US - have your countries brought loudness to order? Did it happen through laws or was it imposed by the broadcasters which are members of EBU themselves?

As for the US - do you have wildly different specs from network to network, or are they more or less on the same page now? - ie, can you make a mix that will pass all or at least most of them?

Looks like this info from January 2013 answers my question as far as Europe goes:
Adoption of the Loudness Recommendation has been spreading throughout Europe, with R 128 now applied in France, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, the Netherlands, the Spanish Autonomous Community of Catalonia, Belgium and, on DAB radio, Norway.
(The quote is from this article: Loudness lift-off for Flemish broadcasters)

How about the rest of the EBU countries and the rest of the world? Here in Serbia, even though our national broadcasting service is a member of the EBU, we still only measure peak, and not even all broadcasters are unified at that. Some ask for -6dBFS, most of them for -9dBFS, and some of them don't have a clue about what you're asking....

What's going on in South America, Russia, UK, Asia, Middle East, Australia, NZ? Africa anyone?

Thanks!
__________________
www.danijelmilosevic.com
danijel is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th March 2013   #2
Gear interested
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 13

Quote:
Originally Posted by danijel View Post
Here in Serbia, even though our national broadcasting service is a member of the EBU, we still only measure peak, and not even all broadcasters are unified at that. Some ask for -6dBFS, most of them for -9dBFS, and some of them don't have a clue about what you're asking....
Same here in Bulgaria(we are neighbours). Two televisions: -9dBFS, three: -10dBFS, one -6dBFS and our national: -12dBFS If your material is not in these "comprehensive" specs - not a problem - there's no QC, or someone who is quality control don't know what is -9dBFS for exampe The quality is from bad to worse!

Offtopic

Almost everything passes, which is awful for the final consumer and also for bigger studios, which gives good sounding products, but nobody cares - across the street also mix shows in the garage - the client will go there. The quality is poor, but is cheaper. Till there's no standarts here and nobody respects them we'll be in this situation. Sorry for the offtopic!
russeff is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2013   #3
Gear interested
 
Lion73's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Location: Manchester UK
Posts: 29

Channel Levels are all over the place here in the UK, most are still asking for PPM6. Some have adopted R128, Sky for example, and others are just plain confused.

I delivered an ad to an Irish channel two weeks ago that had compromised and asked me to deliver at -21LUFS and PPM6 go figure!

I am hoping all will adopt as I enjoy mixing to R128 and life would be simpler!
__________________
"The greatest pleasure in life is doing what people say you cannot do."

www.lionears.co.uk
Lion73 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2013   #4
Lives for gear
 
huub's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: amsterdam
Posts: 1,401
My Recordings/Credits

Have Sky changed their dialnorm, our do R128 and their old dialnorm go together?
huub is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2013   #5
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: London
Posts: 614

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lion73 View Post
Channel Levels are all over the place here in the UK, most are still asking for PPM6. Some have adopted R128, Sky for example, and others are just plain confused.

I delivered an ad to an Irish channel two weeks ago that had compromised and asked me to deliver at -21LUFS and PPM6 go figure!

I am hoping all will adopt as I enjoy mixing to R128 and life would be simpler!
Yeah the major channels have gotten a bit confused. They've kept their old spec but just added a line about r.128 . So still all the info about 6ppm max and dials at around 4ppm, and +8db of ref tone max. When you phone them up they say oh no, dialogue peaking about 6.5 now for the r.128???? I've just gotten the persons name and then written on the rec rep about our convo for safety.
__________________
FF

dubbing mixer / sound designer and all things post sound related!
My IMDB
My Full Credits
My 2011 Showreel
FullFrequency is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2013   #6
Gear addict
 
Mundox's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 489

In NZ, commercials are controlled at -24LKFS and-9dbfs TP for SD, and -2dbfs for HD. It's policed by the digital delivery services, one of them having a wiggle room of a db on the loudness.
Funnily, for long form there's the old -10dbfs requirement and no loudness requirement just yet. But the unwritten law is that you mix to -24.
__________________
Vedat



Automatic volume riding for Pro Tools®
Wave Rider RTAS and AAX for Win and Mac.

Our Facebook Page
http://www.automaticmixing.com

Catchin' SYNC app
Mundox is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2013   #7
Gear interested
 
Lion73's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Location: Manchester UK
Posts: 29

Quote:
Originally Posted by FullFrequency View Post
Yeah the major channels have gotten a bit confused. They've kept their old spec but just added a line about r.128 . So still all the info about 6ppm max and dials at around 4ppm, and +8db of ref tone max. When you phone them up they say oh no, dialogue peaking about 6.5 now for the r.128???? I've just gotten the persons name and then written on the rec rep about our convo for safety.
Yep my experience exactly!

Good call to get the name of whomever is pushing the specs will be doing that from now on!
Lion73 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2013   #8
Dies for gear
 
danijel's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Posts: 1,961
My Recordings/Credits

Thread Starter
Let's hope this thread will be a funny read 5-10 years down the road
danijel is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2013   #9
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: London
Posts: 614

Quote:
Originally Posted by danijel View Post
Let's hope this thread will be a funny read 5-10 years down the road
I'm hoping 6 months. I'm going to get a grey hair if it continues like this
FullFrequency is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2013   #10
Gear interested
 
Lion73's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Location: Manchester UK
Posts: 29

Quote:
Originally Posted by huub View Post
Have Sky changed their dialnorm, our do R128 and their old dialnorm go together?
Ha seems not only the channels are confused but the post houses too!

After saying Sky have changed errrrr....... it seems not, we have just started production meetings on a project for delivery later in the year and the client asked for it to be r128 compliant for delivery to SKY.

However having checked their specs the most recent documentation I can find is from 2011 and states the usual PPM6 peak and PPM 3½ & 5 dialogue.

So I will be digging around and keep you posted.
Lion73 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2013   #11
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: London
Posts: 614

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lion73 View Post
Ha seems not only the channels are confused but the post houses too!

After saying Sky have changed errrrr....... it seems not, we have just started production meetings on a project for delivery later in the year and the client asked for it to be r128 compliant for delivery to SKY.

However having checked their specs the most recent documentation I can find is from 2011 and states the usual PPM6 peak and PPM 3½ & 5 dialogue.

So I will be digging around and keep you posted.
Hey, Sky have been R.128 for a while now, in fact the first UK adopters. The mixes have to be supplied in surround, dolby E encoded, but also Dolby E mix minus, sync/dial, music, effects, and then Stereo VO on 11/12 and Stereo foldown on 1/2.
The weird catch was in the past that the foldown couldn't go over 6ppm and no limiting, so everyone just did a -4db gain adjustment to make it work (which i monitored whilst mixing the surround. i guess this meant that the stereo mix wasn't considered R.128.
I haven't worked on one since everyone else went R.128, so not sure how they consider the stereo fold down at the minute.
FullFrequency is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2013   #12
Lives for gear
 
huub's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: amsterdam
Posts: 1,401
My Recordings/Credits

But Sky have specific Metadata, and hitting the right dialnorm is important so the awful dolby compressor doesn't kick in at home.
I'm curious how R128 fits into this.
huub is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2013   #13
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: London
Posts: 614

Quote:
Originally Posted by huub View Post
But Sky have specific Metadata, and hitting the right dialnorm is important so the awful dolby compressor doesn't kick in at home.
I'm curious how R128 fits into this.
The mix must sit at -23 (+/- 2). The dialnorm metadata you insert must be -23 without fail, even if your mix hits -25. They used to accept you typing in your dialnorm for the metadata, but they all of a sudden changed their minds over that without warning and not changing their spec. I've had conversations with them about it.... imagine a 4db swing within shows. Apparently their own mixers aired concerns over the issue too, although I haven't spoken to any of them personally. Perhaps one of them is on here to chime in!!!?
Maybe I'm missing something, but I've spoken to Sky probably the most out of any channel in order to ensure that mixes satisfy their spec.

I do personally find shows on Sky way more compressed sounding that other channels!
FullFrequency is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2013   #14
Lives for gear
 
huub's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: amsterdam
Posts: 1,401
My Recordings/Credits

But dialnorm and LUFS isn't the same, is it?
I get different readings.
huub is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2013   #15
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: London
Posts: 614

Quote:
Originally Posted by huub View Post
But dialnorm and LUFS isn't the same, is it?
I get different readings.
Well no, but that's how they want it, go figure.... I always measure my infinite dialogue at the same time and do a dial premix to hit the mark though! There is no mention of dialnorm level in the spec, just r.128
FullFrequency is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2013   #16
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: London
Posts: 614

A link to an old thread when Sky first went R.128. it seems everyone may still be as confused

Dial norm QC fail?
FullFrequency is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2013   #17
Gear interested
 
madatao's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Location: Paris
Posts: 4

In France, the specs are "normalized" by the CST and I think a legal text (decree ?) might even exist.
max Lufs -23 +/- 1 db on programs longer than 2min when using long term measuring method.
On a short term basis, tolerance is +/- 7 Lu around -23 Lufs
max true peak -3dBfs (althought I think Ebu is expecting -1)
max LRA <= 20 dB
Technically you're advised to use an ITU-R BS.1770-2 compatible metering system.
Most of the TV channels are expecting your mix to fit with those requirement. But of course, they don't limit their comments to those technical specs and sometime you get your work sent back to you for QC adjustments, more or less regarding artistic matters... Sometimes ego roam around even in this job.
madatao is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2013   #18
Gear interested
 
madatao's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Location: Paris
Posts: 4

Quote:
Originally Posted by huub View Post
But dialnorm and LUFS isn't the same, is it?
I get different readings.
You're absolutely right, it's not the same. They are both weighted scales but with different references. From what I understand, dialnorm is based on LeqA scale (used in LM100 for dialog level dolby E) while Lufs is based on a modified B scale (became Lkfs then Lufs).
madatao is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2013   #19
Gear nut
 
MichalS's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Location: Warsaw, Poland (where East meets West)
Posts: 80

I Poland we are R128 compatible for about a year. That's how I do all my mixes except Disney XD (they still use PAL specification). I enjoy r128 very much and are still surprised when I see a mix of a commercial squashed as they always were, but normalized to -15 dBFS to mach new loudness requirements. They must love that "let your ears bleed!" sound.
MichalS is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20th March 2013   #20
Gear interested
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1

Whats the standard for South America? Cant find any info anywhere? Or would it be Country and the broadcaster specific?
Mix1010 is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
How bands sound on late night TV (Letterman/Leno/etc.) AdamJay Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 46 15th December 2009 09:34 PM
Auto-tune on Billy Joel @ Super Bowl AlexLakis Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 74 8th August 2007 02:03 AM
Smashing Pumpkins live on Letterman krs Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 39 12th July 2007 05:51 PM
Jazz on 3 -- BBC Radio Remoteness Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 34 16th January 2007 02:19 PM
Broadcast on Sunday night Jim Roberts Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 0 30th May 2004 02:01 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:31 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.