Normalizing film dubs - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Post Production forum!

Normalizing film dubs
Topic: New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 25th September 2012   #1
Gear maniac
 
jason kanter's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 167

Thread Starter
Normalizing film dubs

Apologies if this has been covered previously but I'm about to turn the 5.1 as well as the stereo mixes over to my director for a DVD pressing. This is an indie feature release that the director plans to submit to festivals and hopefully get some sort of theater release. He'll be encoding the 5.1/St to Dolby E utilizing Final Cut(Compressor).

The mixes are uncompressed and my thinking is that I should normalize all the 5.1 tracks and then all the ST tracks since I've had bad experiences at festivals with projectionists who don't seem overly concerned with the sound levels from film to film.

Is there a protocol for this? Can anyone give me a reason why this would be a bad idea?

Thanks.
__________________
Jason Kanter
NYC

-End of line.
jason kanter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th September 2012   #2
Lives for gear
 
Henchman's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: LA, USA
Posts: 7,957
My Recordings/Credits

Quote:
Originally Posted by jason kanter View Post
Apologies if this has been covered previously but I'm about to turn the 5.1 as well as the stereo mixes over to my director for a DVD pressing. This is an indie feature release that the director plans to submit to festivals and hopefully get some sort of theater release. He'll be encoding the 5.1/St to Dolby E utilizing Final Cut(Compressor).

The mixes are uncompressed and my thinking is that I should normalize all the 5.1 tracks and then all the ST tracks since I've had bad experiences at festivals with projectionists who don't seem overly concerned with the sound levels from film to film.

Is there a protocol for this? Can anyone give me a reason why this would be a bad idea?

Thanks.
No. You do not do this, as you will wo not have a mix that represents the mix, as mixed at proper calibrated levels.


This isn't music mixing.
Henchman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th September 2012   #3
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: San Francisco area
Posts: 2,929

Quote:
Originally Posted by jason kanter View Post
Apologies if this has been covered previously but I'm about to turn the 5.1 as well as the stereo mixes over to my director for a DVD pressing. This is an indie feature release that the director plans to submit to festivals and hopefully get some sort of theater release. He'll be encoding the 5.1/St to Dolby E utilizing Final Cut(Compressor).

The mixes are uncompressed and my thinking is that I should normalize all the 5.1 tracks and then all the ST tracks since I've had bad experiences at festivals with projectionists who don't seem overly concerned with the sound levels from film to film.

Is there a protocol for this? Can anyone give me a reason why this would be a bad idea?

Thanks.
Do you know where your peaks are, and how high they go? If you normalize all the way to 0 then on some system your peaks will probably distort. If you are having trouble with the dynamic range of the track the time to fix that was in the mix--overall compression will not sound good. Festival projection people will do what they do in any case, and smart directors arrive early and ask for a brief level-check before the show.

phil p
philper is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th September 2012   #4
Lives for gear
 
Henchman's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: LA, USA
Posts: 7,957
My Recordings/Credits

And if the mix doesn't sound like a proper feature mix, well, then it wasn't mixed properly.
There is no magic "mastering" done to film and tv mixes after the fact, to make them sound the way they do. So as Philper said, no additional compression should be done to the mix.
Henchman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th September 2012   #5
Gear maniac
 
jason kanter's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 167

Thread Starter
Understood and thanks for the advice.

Just to clarify, I wasn't looking to compress the mix at all, I just didn't know if there was a normalization process that mixes underwent so that the peaks are at a certain level before being encoded for a DVD release.

I know it's not "kosher" to compress or normalize for a theater release but I also know that festival operators/projectionists can often have a set it and forget it mentality. I've had my mixes playback too low before due to other films that were mixed above reasonable levels. I'm not looking to participate in a volume war but I don't want to have a mix that loses intelligibility due to dynamics either.

Thanks.
jason kanter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th September 2012   #6
Lives for gear
 
Henchman's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: LA, USA
Posts: 7,957
My Recordings/Credits

When I am mixing something that I know will probably only play at a festival, and after that on tv, I mix it at 82.

What was your mix level?
Henchman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th September 2012   #7
Gear maniac
 
jason kanter's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 167

Thread Starter
That makes sense. My room is small so I mix at 79.
jason kanter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th September 2012   #8
Gear nut
 
thermisonic's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: UK

Quote:
Originally Posted by jason kanter View Post
Apologies if this has been covered previously but I'm about to turn the 5.1 as well as the stereo mixes over to my director for a DVD pressing. This is an indie feature release that the director plans to submit to festivals and hopefully get some sort of theater release. He'll be encoding the 5.1/St to Dolby E utilizing Final Cut(Compressor).
Do you mean Dolby Digital? Compressor only does ac3 AFAIK.

A further complication with this kind of film is whether the DVDs are for festival submission or festival screening. Feature film dynamic range on a submission DVD is a bad idea as the festival programmers will probably listen on small TV speakers or laptop with headphones. Obviously you would want feature film dynamic range for a screening DVD, though typically only smaller festivals will play DVD (projectionists hate screening DVD for obvious picture quality reasons).

In other words, you may need to give the director both.

Hope this helps,

Rob Walker AMPS
__________________
http://www.robwalkersound.com/

Last edited by thermisonic; 26th September 2012 at 10:05 AM.. Reason: typo
thermisonic is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th September 2012   #9
Gear maniac
 
jason kanter's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 167

Thread Starter
Ooops- yes, I meant AC3.

Good idea about the dual mixes for festivals.

Thanks.
jason kanter is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
When should you Normalize, if ever? Pronecobra Music Computers 1 11th October 2007 03:20 PM
dub production techniques/gear robd Electronic Music Instruments & Electronic Music Production 17 10th January 2007 01:33 AM
newbie --- audio for film production work! nukmusic Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 5 12th July 2005 10:30 PM
recommend wireless lavs for film/location recording? stupid8track Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 7 27th September 2004 08:42 PM
Locking Pro Tools to High Definition Film e-cue Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 14 9th September 2003 10:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:37 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.