QT sync w/o a video card with ext. sync input - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Post Production forum!

QT sync w/o a video card with ext. sync input
Topic: New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 5th August 2012   #1
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: San Francisco area
Posts: 2,894

Thread Starter
QT sync w/o a video card with ext. sync input

Question re: QT playback within an audio app., without the benefit of a video card that can be locked to house sync (although the DAW IS locked to house sync): I know the sync will float around during playback, but how much? My Syncheck indicates that the extent of the floatiness is about 1/2 a frame, all in one direction (and back)--does that seem possible, or was the computer just in a good mood? This is with just a couple of normal PC video cards (2 x 2 head). I tried locking an interface (Fireface UC) to the optical SPDIF output by the mobo, and while the Fireface did lock the floaty picture sync didn't change. I realize this comes as no surprise to the more techy among you but I thought I'd give it a shot. In any case, as illogical as it seems, having the audio system locked to ext. sync (video) DID make the sync be LESS floaty, and that I've been able to repeat with every test. BOTTOM LINE--how much does that much "float" matter? I'm pretty scrupulous about NOT moving dialog clips off their OMFed positions, but that assumes they were in sync in the first place….

phil p
philper is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2012   #2
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 275

I found a very similar number. I get + or - 1/4 frame float. To me that's fine. As long as I'm under a frame, sync wise, I'm good.
brandoncross is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2012   #3
Gear addict
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 454

I think it depends on the DAW and platform. PT on OSX has been shown to get sloppy on playback, but it seems to be less than a frame. Anything more than that and theres usually a different cause in my experience.
__________________
~Will
smurfyou is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 7th August 2012   #4
Lives for gear
 
ggegan's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: The Heart of Screenland
Posts: 1,832

With my Intensity Pro card I get +or- 1/2 frame accuracy.

If I fed a video reference to a Decklink card from my Sync HD, would I be able to get the internal Quicktime to align the video frame edge to Pro Tools with no drift?
__________________
Gary Gegan
ggegan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 7th August 2012   #5
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 275

Yes. Both pro tools and the black magic will be frame alined to the bb signal. The qt 1/4 frame video offset adjustment will not work in 1/4 frames.
brandoncross is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 7th August 2012   #6
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,274

Quote:
Originally Posted by brandoncross View Post
Yes. Both pro tools and the black magic will be frame alined to the bb signal. The qt 1/4 frame video offset adjustment will not work in 1/4 frames.
The Intensity pro can NOT be gen-locked to tri-level sync. You will need at least a HD extreme (around 900-1000$) plus a Sync HD plus a tri-level sync generator. The Intensity pro doesn't have a sync input.
Due to the QT start-error you can not get the Intensity pro within a consistent 1/4 frame reliable accuracy.

It will also vary depending on session load and QT codec.

When testing with Syncheck you need to do it in the fully loaded session with the identical codec flash QT to compensate. An empty session with just the pips will give you a different offset than a 200-track session with loads of plugins.
apple-q is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 7th August 2012   #7
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 275

Quote:
Originally Posted by apple-q View Post
The Intensity pro can NOT be gen-locked to tri-level sync. You will need at least a HD extreme (around 900-1000$) plus a Sync HD plus a tri-level sync generator. The Intensity pro doesn't have a sync input.
Due to the QT start-error you can not get the Intensity pro within a consistent 1/4 frame reliable accuracy.

It will also vary depending on session load and QT codec.

When testing with Syncheck you need to do it in the fully loaded session with the identical codec flash QT to compensate. An empty session with just the pips will give you a different offset than a 200-track session with loads of plugins.
Sync check says 1/4 + or - on every single play. Not sure how I'm getting it this tight but it's 1/2 frame error. I just put the target on the middle of the 1/2.

You are right about the bm intensity. No gen lock. I would liketo know if you could lock a sync he to the composite video out of it to frame align pt wo the bm. This way syncing the video 100%.

As far as session load goes, I use video satellite so I never have a session with anything but video in it.
brandoncross is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 7th August 2012   #8
Lives for gear
 
ggegan's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: The Heart of Screenland
Posts: 1,832

Quote:
Originally Posted by apple-q View Post
You will need at least a HD extreme (around 900-1000$)
I would think the Decklink SDI should work. It has video reference input and costs about $280 online. You might need an SDI to HDMI converter to connect it to an HDTV, which will cost a couple hundred dollars more, so that would be just under $500.

A DV25 codec on my system needs a 6 quarter frame offset, so wouldn't that mean that a card with a video reference input that requires whole frame offsets would guarantee a half frame error?

Granted, it would be consistant, but it's not clear to me how that would be better than my Intensity Pro, which usually seems to stay within +or- a quarter frame error and occasionally drifts to 1/2 frame error. Am I missing something?
ggegan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 7th August 2012   #9
Gear Head
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 71

Gary:- ProTools only states that it will be accurate to +- 1 frame without genlock. Theoretically you should get frame edge alignment using a Sync HD to lock PT with the video card.

The statement that you will need at least the BM HD Extreme is incorrect. I use a BM Studio 2, which has worked flawlessly for all my SD and HD projects and is considerably cheaper than the HD Extreme.

G
GregorioM is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 8th August 2012   #10
Lives for gear
 
ggegan's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: The Heart of Screenland
Posts: 1,832

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregorioM View Post
Gary:- ProTools only states that it will be accurate to +- 1 frame without genlock. Theoretically you should get frame edge alignment using a Sync HD to lock PT with the video card.

The statement that you will need at least the BM HD Extreme is incorrect. I use a BM Studio 2, which has worked flawlessly for all my SD and HD projects and is considerably cheaper than the HD Extreme.

G
I haven't seen +or- 1 frame errors yet when checking sync with Syncheck, but that doesn't mean they don't occur. I'm about ready to dump the Intensity Pro on one of my systems, anyway, and upgrade to a Decklink SDI or Studio. I'd rather be absolutely sure of what the sync situation is, even if the video offset prevents it from being dead on, at least it will be predictable.
ggegan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 8th August 2012   #11
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,274

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregorioM View Post
Gary:- ProTools only states that it will be accurate to +- 1 frame without genlock. Theoretically you should get frame edge alignment using a Sync HD to lock PT with the video card.

The statement that you will need at least the BM HD Extreme is incorrect. I use a BM Studio 2, which has worked flawlessly for all my SD and HD projects and is considerably cheaper than the HD Extreme.

G
What I meant was that you need at least a card with genlock in be it the extreme HD or what ever other has gen-lock in. It was only an example but with the intensity pro you won't gain 100% accuracy.
AND you need a sync HD because pt will only align to tc edges when you set the sync hd to generate LTC (see info page about sync heck)
apple-q is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Do I need video reference to capture audio or video? gsilbers Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 12 30th November 2007 08:31 PM
OK let's talk about sync on video shoots yrplace Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 14 21st October 2007 06:05 PM
Big Ben - sync with HD Core Card? slickmf So much gear, so little time! 5 8th August 2007 03:51 AM
SMPTE-sync playback with ProTools LE? StefanM Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 12 16th August 2005 09:28 PM
Locking/Syncing up ProTools vanZed Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 11 21st July 2005 10:55 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:19 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.