Which Noise Reduction-PlugIn do you prefer... and why? - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Post Production forum!

Which Noise Reduction-PlugIn do you prefer... and why?
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 17th July 2012   #1
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Location: Berlin
Posts: 9

Thread Starter
Which Noise Reduction-PlugIn do you prefer... and why?

Hey there!

I'm looking for Noise Reduction-PlugINs (ProTools AU/RTAS). I like the Waves Restoration-Suite, but I'm not sure if it's currently the best solution... due to the fact that this suite was released years ago.
So, I'm interested in your favorite tools fighting against different noises like room tones, fans, crackles, clicks, random noises, whatever....

Thank you!
Save The Vinyl is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2012   #2
Gear addict
 
Vytis's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: Vilnius
Posts: 497

1. Cedar DNS One
2. Izotope RX2

Nothing can beat Cedar...
Vytis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2012   #3
Gear Head
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 62

3. Spectral Layers
itsyourself is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2012   #4
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,268

Quote:
Originally Posted by Save The Vinyl View Post
Hey there!

I'm looking for Noise Reduction-PlugINs (ProTools AU/RTAS). I like the Waves Restoration-Suite, but I'm not sure if it's currently the best solution... due to the fact that this suite was released years ago.
So, I'm interested in your favorite tools fighting against different noises like room tones, fans, crackles, clicks, random noises, whatever....

Thank you!
There is no one-size fits all plugin. They all have their ups and downs.

DNS one does not de-crackle for example.

My personal choice depends on the type of noise.

For de-clicking I still find the NoNoise manual de-clicker best. The RX is good but not as good.

De-Noising: Depends. Some work is best done with multi band expanders (C4, multi dynamics, Dolby 430, 43) each of them having a different character. The dolbys are great because they never sound digital no matter how hard you push them (unlike RX, Cedar or others)
RX will give you great results but you need time. Cedar is fast to set and operate and gives good results but you'll get space-monkeys at some point unlike with the Dolby units.

De-Clipping: RX

Below the line: You will need a whole bunch to tackle all problems.

Waves X-Noise: my least favorite. Space monkey time.

The best bang for the buck all over starter package might be RX. Try to get SonicNoise on ebay. The de-clicker alone is worth the price.
apple-q is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2012   #5
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Location: Berlin
Posts: 9

Thread Starter
Thanx a lot !
Save The Vinyl is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2012   #6
Lives for gear
 
Henchman's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: LA, USA
Posts: 7,884
My Recordings/Credits

Cedar.
Henchman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2012   #7
Lives for gear
 
Alexey Lukin's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 875

Quote:
Originally Posted by apple-q View Post
For de-clicking I still find the NoNoise manual de-clicker best. The RX is good but not as good.
I don't have NoNoise at hand, but would be interested to learn about its quality. Do you have any before/after sample where it shines?
Alexey Lukin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2012   #8
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,268

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alexey Lukin View Post
I don't have NoNoise at hand, but would be interested to learn about its quality. Do you have any before/after sample where it shines?
Sorry. I won't be in my studio for a few weeks but you can rent the plugin for 2 days in the AVID store.

I think there's a demo too.
apple-q is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2012   #9
Gear Guru
 
charles maynes's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Location: out in the dirt.
Posts: 15,766

I have the Oxford suite, RX2, WNS, W43 and multiband dynamics C4 and ML4000-

the RX suite seems to the most cpu intensive, but it does sound pretty good-

the Sonnox stuff is also very good, though I think their strength is in the decrackle - dehum realm-

WNS is really doing nicely for me for broadband NR- I like it much more than the other plugins for that- and it is very easy on the cpu-

W43 is very nice if you are in a Cat 43 sort of mood-

C4 and ML4000 are very handy for doing more effects sort of work- IE using them as expanders to tame BG noises....
__________________
Charles Maynes credits
Charles' webpage

"Better the Arabs do it tolerably than that you do it perfectly. It is their war, and you are to help them, not to win it for them." T.E. Lawrence

today is a good day to make your obituary better....



General Smedley Butler- WAR IS A RACKET

American Rhetoric: Dwight D. Eisenhower - Farewell Address
charles maynes is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2012   #10
Lives for gear
 
Henchman's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: LA, USA
Posts: 7,884
My Recordings/Credits

Quote:
Originally Posted by charles maynes View Post

C4 and ML4000 are very handy for doing more effects sort of work- IE using them as expanders to tame BG noises....
Which of those do you prefer as an expander?
Henchman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2012   #11
Gear Guru
 
charles maynes's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Location: out in the dirt.
Posts: 15,766

Quote:
Originally Posted by Henchman View Post
Which of those do you prefer as an expander?
thats a tough one- I think they can get the same results- its just a matter of what interface is more comfortable for you.... I have probably used C4 more over the years, but thats mainly due to it existing for a lot longer time-

I am really interested in getting C6 though, as it has two floating bands that sound like they could be pretty handy....
charles maynes is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2012   #12
Gear nut
 
Electric Blue's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Location: Brooklyn

ive never had any issues using the noise reduction in sound forge. great to analyze the noise and reduce to taste.
Electric Blue is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2012   #13
Gear nut
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 83

You can get a lot done quickly with some EQ and C4. For particularly noisy audio I will sometimes audio suite some light x-noise as well.

Since we are on the subject where in the chain is noise reduction most effective? Been experimenting with this for some time and I prefer to have it almost at the start of the signal chain but that´s just me.
__________________
-Eric
cocamycola89 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2012   #14
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Location: Moncton, NB, Canada
Posts: 154

iZotope RX2 suite. Cheap and works very well.
paranerd is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2012   #15
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 635

Where to do NR in the chain?
After lo/hi filters but before any other dynamics processing. Deessing can work ahead of NR though.
Personally I prefer to do it destructively most of the time. And when done destructively you should apply NR before fade in/outs. Make sure to split the sounds by mic angle/take/noise profile to be able to work quickly.
__________________
Europa Sound & Vision
Euphonix 32 fader S5MC + stand alone MC, Nuendo x 7, Protools x 7
Dub stage with HD projection (13m throw), VVTR,
and soon a complete picture department with online, grading and more.
http://www.europasoundvision.se
ErikG is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 19th July 2012   #16
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: Paris, France

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vytis View Post
1. Cedar DNS One
2. Izotope RX2

Nothing can beat Cedar...
+1000

Sent from my XT910 using Gearslutz App
Steven1145 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20th July 2012   #17
Gear addict
 
Mundox's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 489

RX beats Cedar dealing with tonal content. (buzz, cicadas etc)
Cedar beats RX at broadband.
__________________
Vedat



Automatic volume riding for Pro Tools®
Wave Rider RTAS and AAX for Win and Mac.

Our Facebook Page
http://www.automaticmixing.com

Catchin' SYNC app
Mundox is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22nd July 2012   #18
Lives for gear
 
TinderArts's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Location: Bowie, MD
Posts: 531

I use RX2 at work daily and I have grown very fond of the NR capacities. I have the Waves, Algorithmix and a few other NR plugs (not Cedar). Doing a few passes with different settings at different frequency ranges with RX can yield excellent results that I haven't been able to match with anything else yet. For the money, RX2 is the strongest restoration suite I know of.

I'll be doing a couple RX2 training videos for work in the next few days. If they allow me, I'll post a link to the the NR portion for folks to check out.
__________________
Support live music!
TinderArts is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22nd July 2012   #19
Gear addict
 
Branko's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Lisbon

Quote:
Originally Posted by ErikG View Post
Where to do NR in the chain?
I always have some notch filters (NF575 or UN-EQUILIZER) in front of WNS to clean up some static whistles and/or hums before NR.
All the EQ and compression & de-essing comes after.
As we're talkin' NR, I have to say I'm using RX2 more every day, because somehow it doesn't affect the "space" on tracks that much.
Branko is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2012   #20
Gear addict
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 441

Quote:
Originally Posted by charles maynes View Post
I am really interested in getting C6 though, as it has two floating bands that sound like they could be pretty handy....
I picked up the C6 recently. It was on sale and I had a voucher from another purchase so I got it cheap. I like it, seems to work just like the C4 with extra flex bands. If you have the C4 I don't know that its worth the full asking price, but if its on sale I'd recommend it.
__________________
~Will
smurfyou is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2012   #21
Lives for gear
 
soundboy's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 783

I just used RX2 spectral repair to remove the club sounds (distant) from a few dialog tracks! I love this tool. Also my CEDAR and Cat. 43, and X Noise. Each for different problems and different results.
__________________
Charles Dayton, CAS
Twisted Avocado Post Audio
Partial credits:
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0206743/
soundboy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2012   #22
Gear nut
 
misscc803's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Location: Roswell, GA

I like the Waves W43 it works great but won't work for everything. I am looking to get X noise from Waves as well and some other plug ins.

Nicole
__________________
Nicole Hankerson
Location and Post Sound
ccproductions803@gmail.com

www.ccproductions803.com
www.facebook.com/ccproductions803
misscc803 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2012   #23
Gear interested
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 12

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vytis View Post
1. Cedar DNS One
2. Izotope RX2

Nothing can beat Cedar...
-totally

The only thing that I would add is take a swing with the dip filters first if it's that kinda noise. I use Q10.

My chain for noise is Q10 then usually 2 cedar instances. That way I don't get all gatey on tonal stuff. With the cedar I use one to carve trouble spots and the second one to give it an overall if I need it.

I use RX a lot too. Some times RX is a savior, sometimes it makes it all worse. I find that RX can be a little less forgiving in general, but its usually the second thing that i'm reaching for after cedar. For trouble spots I usually end up using all of the above. I spank it with Izotope, then soften the edges with cedar.

Oh how I love cedar, if I had to pick only one plugin.....


But altiverb would be my mistress.
__________________
Brad Engleking
Partial Credits
feaker is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2012   #24
Matt R. Sherman
 
Smallbudgetguru's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 508

+1 cedar , rx , sonnox, wns, q10 for notch
Smallbudgetguru is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2012   #25
Gear nut
 
John T's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: Central Valley, CA
Posts: 102

I've had to go through some really bad recordings with everything from 60 cycle hum to tape hiss to removing a really obnoxious cricket and have found that Izotope RX performed well and is pretty cheap.
__________________
www.triplesevenrecording.com
John T is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2012   #26
Lives for gear
 
BIGBANGBUZZ's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 546

It's never a one trick pony..
You need a 3 or 4 tools in your arsenal

Sent from my GT-N7000 using Gearslutz App
__________________
ProTools HD Native, C 24 control surface, Mac Pro Intel duo Quad, Decklink Studio 2 and a Coleman VU
Microphones, Nuemann Tlm 103, SE GeminII Twin Tube and a H4
Massey De-esser and L2007, Izotope RX2,
DMG Audio Equality and Compassion. Waves w43, Dorrough, Rbass, Rcomp plus heaps more.
BIGBANGBUZZ is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2012   #27
Gear interested
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 27

Dobt understand the hate for x-noise, I use it very lightly on sone problem vocals i get from outside sources and it works like a charm.

Sent from my LG-MS840 using Gearslutz App
BrokenSilenceEnt is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2012   #28
Gear interested
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 6

The Waves bundle have always served me well. No fuss and sound good.
Sixstringzzz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2012   #29
Gear addict
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 391

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrokenSilenceEnt View Post
Dobt understand the hate for x-noise, I use it very lightly on sone problem vocals i get from outside sources and it works like a charm.

Sent from my LG-MS840 using Gearslutz App
Neither do I. I've tried Izotope and all the other Waves NR plugs but found X-Noise to work the best for me with few discernible artifacts.
soundfx is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th August 2012   #30
Lives for gear
 
Filthrill's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 594

How many mastering guys on here are using noise reduction on a regular basis on stuff like Hip Hop, Pop, & Rock? Or is it a rare thing for you in mastering?
__________________
Fil
...the song will be faded out by that point.
Filthrill is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
How do you handle cold calls from potential clients? Remoteness Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 32 4th May 2009 06:32 PM
What kind of PTZ camera setup do you use? jazzbutcher Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 18 28th November 2007 09:32 AM
SECURITY! how do you handle it on a live gig? TheGetDown Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 30 22nd November 2007 07:41 PM
RF Choke rings. Do you use them? Do they work? roonsbane Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 11 13th September 2007 05:41 AM
what do these noise from a tube mic point to? bartuk Geekslutz forum 1 8th August 2007 02:12 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:51 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.