Probelm with K-weighting in BS1770 - Page 2 - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Post Production forum!


Probelm with K-weighting in BS1770

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 4th February 2012   #31
Gear nut
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 107

Orban has for his own use in the Optimod. You can get a sampling of it by downloading his -free- software loudness meter from his website. It includes CBS, BS-1770, etc. I don't know if gating ever made its way in this implementation of '1770.
tpad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2012   #32
Lives for gear
 
UnderTow's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 3,953

Quote:
Originally Posted by tpad View Post
Undertow. I think YOU missed the point. FM broadcasters use processing - period. Whether it is Orban's or some other brand, they all do similar things to the signal. An undesired side effect of ANY of the popular brands is that hypercompressed rock music sounds pretty dreadful after it has been run through them. Rather than nitpick about Orban's alleged bias, you should be thanking him for identifying the problem cause. He originally published that observation on rec.pro.audio in the 90's, so it is rather dated material. Similar degradation occurs when you try and encode hypercompressed material with AAC, MP3, etc. So the finger points back to the hypercompressed material, not the audio processing.
No I am not missing the point. If the master sounds fine in the studio with no further processing, the problem is the radio processing or lossy data encoding. Not that I favour the loudness war but in the studio you can carefully shape the signal while monitoring with a high quality monitoring chain in a room with good acoustics so you know exactly what compromises you are making between loudness and sonic fidelity. Radio processors (Omnia, Optimod's, Aphex 2020's or whatever) can not do that. You set them and forget about it with all the consequences that that entails.

Of course it is up to the clients to set up their radio processors accordingly but the point here is that Mr Orban didn't write a paper directed at his clients warning them and educating them on the dangers of over-using his products in the current world with the current crop of very loud masters. (Like it or not, it is a reality and let's not forget that the clients signed off on those over-loud masters). He wrote a paper blaming the mastering and seemingly washing his hands of the blame of what his (and other's) processing is doing to masters that were (mostly) carefully crafted to make maximum usage of the PCM audio format in a way that satisfies the wishes of the artists. I would have been more impressed if he educated both camps. Both his clients and the mastering engineers.

Quote:
Incidentally, FM Optimods don't use mutiband clipping. That's why I suggested you do a little more research on the art of broadcast processing before trying to discuss here.
You can verify the literature and documentation yourself. Optimod's have multi-band clippers. Look it up: ftp://ftp.orban.com/8600/8600FM/Documentation/

Not only is there multi-band clipping, depending on the mode you use, there is a separate bass and HF clipper following the multi-band clipper and a final clipper after that. Three layers of clipping for maximum perceived volume.

That is all good and well, after all that is what the clients want, but Mr Orban could be educating his clients at the same time rather than just pointing the finger elsewhere. Hence my comments of bias.

Alistair
__________________
Alistair Johnston - TV & Film Post, Mastering, Sound Design
--
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself -- and you are the easiest person to fool" -- Richard P. Feynman

"There's a sucker born every minute" -- P.T. Barnum
UnderTow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2012   #33
Gear nut
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 107

Now that you've finished your rant, why not get back on-topic, which is not discussing FM radio processing?
tpad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th February 2012   #34
Gear addict
 
Fredo's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 333

Radio processors (Orban, Omnia, ...) are meant to create "a sound signature".
However, they are being used for only one purpose: being the loudest radiostation on the dial, regardless of the sound quality consequences that comes with it.


Fredo
Temple Of Tune
Belgium
Fredo is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
With a Cheapness (Compressors) Inexpensive Compressors for the Budget-Minded Slut Kent Low End Theory 85 2nd July 2011 06:32 PM
With a Cheapness (EQs) Inexpensive Equalization for the Budget-Minded Slut Kent Low End Theory 35 13th August 2009 08:05 AM
With a Cheapness - Microphones Labs Low End Theory 123 31st May 2007 05:37 AM
With a Cheapness (Reverbs/Multi-Effects) Inexpensive Loot for the Budget-Minded Slut Kent Low End Theory 38 11th April 2007 10:17 PM
With a Cheapness (Delays & such) Inexpensive Time-based FX for the Budget-Minded Slut Kent Low End Theory 29 17th July 2006 05:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:08 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.