![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear Head Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 63
Thread Starter | Where is the best place for video files?
Hey, Working on A\V projects (music or post production), on PT and Nuendo. Where is the best place to put the videos files in ? Now they are in the "Projects" HDD - in separate folder called "Videos". Should it better be somewhere else for better performance? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear |
I keep my videos on a separate drive. Not the Application drive and not the Audio drive. Though truth be told, I do this due to superstition, and I see pretty poor native video performance in both platforms no matter where it's reading video from.
__________________ www.kdsound.net PT10.2 CPTK Nuendo 5.5.3 Avid Control, Mix, Transport Basehead 3.2 JBL LSR4326 win7 64 |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear Head Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 63
Thread Starter |
Thank you but there must be some kind of "tech" answer to that issue.
|
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear nut Joined: Nov 2009 Location: Beverly Hills
Posts: 141
|
Jesse's answer was correct. The tech reason is, when you are mixing, editing, recording or what not, you are constantly reading and witting to the audio drive. If there's video in the session, you want the computer to access the data separately via another internal drive that also meets specs, 7,200 rpm or higher and it's a general rule of thumb to not have the drive with more than 75% capacity. I have a TB drive and hover around 200-300 GB of video. This way all the seek times of reading and writing to the audio drive for your session and having your video on another drive keeps date coming in and out a LOT smoother and faster. Hence this is the reason you shouldn't have your sessions on the boot drive. It makes the system work much harder accessing it's on resources, then that of the audio session and video. But when everything is on separate drive, the computer works less at retrieving and writing data. For huge sessions like a 5.1 film that's 2 hours, this is standard.
|
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2006 Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 3,953
|
If your harddrive is fast enough to deliver the audio and video on time for the DAW, it doesn't matter. If the drive is not fast enough it is best to separate the media. What determines if the drive is fast enough? Well the actual speed of the drive itself (rotational speed, number of platters, cache memory, controlling electronics etc), how full it is, how fragmented it is (not really an issue these days), the bandwidth of the video you are using, the number of audio tracks, the bit depth and sample rate of the audio, the caching mechanisms of your drive, of your OS, of the DAW application etc etc Personally, considering how cheap drives are (even now despite the floods in Thailand), I think it is always best to use multiple drives if you can. One for the OS, one for your project audio, one for video and one for your sample library. Alistair
__________________ Alistair Johnston - TV & Film Post, Mastering, Sound Design -- "The first principle is that you must not fool yourself -- and you are the easiest person to fool" -- Richard P. Feynman "There's a sucker born every minute" -- P.T. Barnum |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2008 Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Posts: 1,732
|
Or if you have lots of memory, read Alistairs great thread about RAM drives and run everything from RAM!
__________________ Danijel Milosevic |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2006 Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 3,953
| Quote:
Alistair | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear Head Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 63
Thread Starter | It works fine on my WD black caviar - my HDD for my projects. but after reading Ill try with separate drives, just to see how it goes. I'll also going to read the RAM thread. thank you. |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 29.97 and 23.98 SMPTE timecode -- The definitive explanation | jacobfarron | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 47 | 13th May 2010 09:01 AM |
| Totally lost on the best way to do this. Live Sound w/ 2 mics | jjcalleiro | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 15 | 12th April 2008 08:28 AM |
| Command & compassion: Is it a fool’s mix or the right blend for a production Venture? | Remoteness | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 5 | 28th September 2007 02:08 PM |
| Behind the stage at Lincoln Center, with Steve Remote | u b k | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 35 | 28th December 2006 03:07 AM |
| Is video (sound) the future? | Sound Chaser | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 6 | 16th June 2006 05:17 PM |
| |