send fx vs Stems - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Post Production forum!


send fx vs Stems

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10th December 2010   #1
Lives for gear
 
Jesse Peterson's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2008
Location: New York City
Posts: 809

Thread Starter
Send a message via AIM to Jesse Peterson
send fx vs Stems

This is a Q for the hollywood gang.

Do you do a separate stem for your fx returns or do they get printed with whatever is being sent to them?

If the later how do you manage that? How many verbs are you typically automating and how do you route them?

What if two guys are arguing while sword fighting in a cave lol? Would you do two separate verbs with similar settings or send to the same one?

I sure every situation has different needs but I'm curious what your starting points are.

thanks
__________________
www.kdsound.net
PT10.2 CPTK
Nuendo 5.5.3
Avid Control, Mix, Transport
Basehead 3.2
JBL LSR4326
win7 64
Jesse Peterson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th December 2010   #2
Gear addict
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 312

Hi Jesse,
Verbs and other FX need to stay on the stem they "belong" to, so the DX verb goes on the DX stem, FX verb on the FX stem, etc. Set up separate verbs for each "food group", even if they're set identically. This will also allow you to print your stems in one pass.
Hope that helped
best,
Joe
__________________
Joe Milner
Puget Sound, Inc.
Los Angeles, CA

IMDB

Puget Sound on Facebook
JoeMilner is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10th December 2010   #3
Lives for gear
 
ggegan's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: The Heart of Screenland
Posts: 1,603

I work similarly to how Joe does.

If I'm doing a one Pro Tools system ICON mix by myself, then I'll have 1 or 2 Revibe returns for each stem to a maximum of 10. I find that with more than 10 instances of Revibe per system, I start having issues with inexplicable digital feedback loops. With a 2 or 3 system ICON, I'll use many more.

If I'm just mixing FX, I usually have the same number because I'll use more Revibe returns for each stem (FX, BGs, Foley) and I'll have specific presets for each: i.e. for FX I might have a small room, large room, exterior slap and a long design verb.

If I think it is warranted, I may also have anywhere from 6 to 10 Altiverb returns as well, although sometimes I don't bother. Even though I have Altiverb TDM, I'll run these as RTAS because otherwise adding that many long TDM Altiverbs will crash my system, even though I have an HD6. If I had known this when I bought Altiverb, I could have saved some money and just gotten the RTAS version.
__________________
Gary Gegan
ggegan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th December 2010   #4
Lives for gear
 
Jesse Peterson's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2008
Location: New York City
Posts: 809

Thread Starter
Send a message via AIM to Jesse Peterson
Thanks to both of you guys
Jesse Peterson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2010   #5
Lives for gear
 
cebolao's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2003
Location: warsaw, poland
Posts: 529

OT: RTAS verb?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ggegan View Post

If I had known this when I bought Altiverb, I could have saved some money and just gotten the RTAS version.
how could you use an RTAS reveb in PTHD? as far as i know, when inserted on AUX track, RTAS plugin adds huge latency. so it's kind of "obligatory predelay".

or am i missing something?
__________________
http://myspace.com/witkacy_mix
cebolao is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th December 2010   #6
Lives for gear
 
ggegan's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: The Heart of Screenland
Posts: 1,603

Quote:
Originally Posted by cebolao View Post
how could you use an RTAS reveb in PTHD? as far as i know, when inserted on AUX track, RTAS plugin adds huge latency. so it's kind of "obligatory predelay".

or am i missing something?
If you keep the buffer at 256, which I always do, I believe the latency is something like 8 or 9 msec, or slightly less than a quarter film frame, which to me is only very slightly noticable on reverb decays shorter than 400 msec and totally unnoticable for longer reverb decays greater than say 750-1000 msec. Unless you are doing an AB test listening specifically for predelay differences between TDM and RTAS, you won't notice it. However, that amount of latency can be dealt with using the short ADC setting. If you use a buffer of 512, I think that pushes you into the long ADC setting, and higher buffers mean that Altiverb's latency is outside of ADC range, and to me is unusable.
ggegan is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why send Reverb/Delays to a Send and not an Insert? Mr.Noobyman So much gear, so little time! 15 10th September 2009 02:41 AM
Panning a reverb send and return in Sonar(can u link the send pan with fader pan)? skiroy So much gear, so little time! 4 22nd August 2009 05:35 AM
The place where u send an audio file and they send it bak with a huge natrl rvrb free Realziment So much gear, so little time! 7 5th February 2009 05:12 PM
ProTools: copy a send (w/send level intact) from 1 to 30 audio tracks? mixerguy Music computers 9 30th December 2007 09:59 PM
Tip send vs. Ring send? woods So much gear, so little time! 35 6th May 2006 02:52 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:58 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.