![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear Head Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 63
Thread Starter | Two tracks,one source - which one should I pick ?
Hey, This is a very popular. We have 2 tracks (PT) from 2 different mics from the same source and location. one mic sounds fuller, warm with more beefy touch to it but it also noisy and hissy. The second track have a very weak and thin response buton the other hand, this track is much cleaner and smooth. Should i go on the rich and noisy where i'll need EQ's and NR ? or maybe i should go on the cleaner and weaker and just amplify it as hell? Thank you.. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2008 Location: @$tr@L pL@n3
Posts: 1,511
|
Use the 2nd with some aid from the low freq. of the first |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear interested Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 23
|
i suffered that same dilema over and over the years working for reality Tv shows here in argentina. In many cases the chief production manager, hires people with no experience at all in location sound (at least, please hire a couple of experienced guys and a couple with no experience to work and learn at the same time, but no...) or even worse, they rent very cheap equipment, in order to save money... I would try first with the clean and poor level track. Just amplify to the necesary and use some X noise to clean it. With a little help of some EQ low pass, to limitate even more the hissss. Then if it doesnt work, expend more time trying to adjust the other track with EQ´S. hope it works ! |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 310
|
Pay attention to what's going on with the picture, for there are times when the "better" mic is inappropriate for the image, story, character, etc. That aside, I fully agree with the other posts in saying that in general you want to pick the channel that gives you the most to work with. A robust but noisy track will probably give you more happiness than a quieter but deeply damaged track. If there's nothing to work with, there's nothing to work with.
__________________ John Purcell author of Dialogue Editing for Motion Pictures: A Guide to the Invisible Art (Focal Press) |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear Guru Joined: Jan 2004 Location: out in the dirt.
Posts: 15,625
|
that is a very sketchy question- if you are preparing the tracks for a mixer, You should carry both, in sync, and allow them to choose- If YOU are mixing the track, the typical goal will to be to have as smooth of a track as is possible- you might have varying degrees of both channels running depending on camera angles and the like.
__________________ Charles Maynes credits Charles' webpage "Better the Arabs do it tolerably than that you do it perfectly. It is their war, and you are to help them, not to win it for them." T.E. Lawrence today is a good day to make your obituary better.... General Smedley Butler- WAR IS A RACKET American Rhetoric: Dwight D. Eisenhower - Farewell Address |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear interested Joined: Sep 2009 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 7
| Two tracks,one source - which one should I pick ?
Well... How much work do you want to do? First track: open up two plug in windows. Second track: open up one plug in window. I would choose the latter. After all, didn't "they" create DAWs to eliminate any need for expertise and knowledge of recording sound?
__________________ Pete Rauls Los Angeles, CA |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear Head Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 63
Thread Starter |
Ok, I decide it is better to use both. The full, strong but noisy one just feels more natural according the picture in 95% of the shots. the 2nd one feels more like some kind of early reflections carrier, so on some shots it will work with the 1st track. there are some shots where the 2nd mic is better for the shot. Thank you all. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear interested Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 23
| I think that soundpost, is created to enhance audio possibilites. Not, to be cheap in location, make mistakes, dont care about audio, and then work with post. You can improve a lousy location audio, but if you have a professional and nice audio source, is so much better for the product, and of course, to the industry. There are so many elements of the mix that you can work and improve, not just the Dx. But if you have a lousy DX, maybe you dont have time to work your magic in the other elements of the final mix.
|
| | |
| | #9 |
| Gear addict Joined: Mar 2009 Location: The O.C.
Posts: 479
|
Sounds like a typical boom/lav setup. I prefer the boom IF it works with the camera angle or perspective. I'm not a big fan of lavs as many get buried under clothes which kills the topend and can add rustle noise. Avoid fighting impact noises vs constant noise. In other words, the boom might have a higher noise floor due to room ambience, but it could be easier to clean up. Pick your battles, but go with the overall cleaner track. Also, decide as late as possible. Wait if possible, until all other elements are in place (music, FX, ADR if needed) to make the final call.
__________________ |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Source Elements announces Source-Zip | Source-Elements | Product Alerts older than 2 months | 12 | 18th December 2009 07:33 PM |
| master edits (dj mix into 10 tracks for disc, plus encoding artist name to tracks) | ScottAltiz | Mastering forum | 1 | 30th May 2009 08:41 PM |
| Quality Karaoke tracks - source? | Gone | So much gear, so little time! | 4 | 25th April 2008 01:44 AM |
| Good source online source of cables? | enroper | instruments, guitar, bass, amps | 14 | 28th January 2008 04:07 AM |
| |