Itu-r bs.1770 - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Post Production forum!


Itu-r bs.1770

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 7th September 2010   #1
Lives for gear
 
jahtao's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 638

Thread Starter
Itu-r bs.1770

Dolby Media Meter does not do this with a 4sec time constant. Its stuck at 10sec. There doesn't seem to be a plugin that does.

Keep up with the European market Dolby!!! GRRRRRR
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by reallyjake View Post
I had a Shoot out with behringer and a Shotgun. It's hard to say who won. Humanity? The shotgun was a vintage Remington 12 gauge. It was semi-auto, not pump, if that makes any difference. The Remington had quite a bit of bass and high-end, as well as punch and kick. It blew the behringer to bits. I know many like to brag, "this unit smokes this one". But that is what happened here. There was a sort of natural reverb when firing at the Behringer and it sounded sweet to my ears.
jahtao is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th September 2010   #2
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: London, UK
Posts: 560

Quote:
Originally Posted by jahtao View Post
Dolby Media Meter does not do this with a 4sec time constant. Its stuck at 10sec. There doesn't seem to be a plugin that does.

Keep up with the European market Dolby!!! GRRRRRR

You should look at the TC LM5 - I believe the short term metering is variable.
tom_lowe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th September 2010   #3
GS Community Manager
 
Whitecat's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: Surrey / London
Posts: 6,126

And write to Dolby in the meantime. They're pretty receptive to end-user feedback like that, in my experience.
__________________
Scott J. - Gearslutz.com Community Manager

my other job: http://www.whitecat.tv - film/web/tv/video/audio post & music

Gear for sale!

@WhitecatTV
Whitecat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th September 2010   #4
Gear Head
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 41

I was under the impression that the final EBU recommendation for Loudness metering in Europe had less than 2 months! And it seems very different from ITU's recommendation.

Give Dolby a break, it's summer time, and I'll bet a lot of questions will be put to the EBU, for example, at the IBC. This may not be the final spec!

EBU R128 Loudness normalisation and permitted maximum level of audio signals
EBU Tech 3341 'EBU Mode' metering to supplement EBU R 128 loudness normalisation
EBU Tech 3342 Loudness range: A descriptor to supplement EBU R 128 loudness

Now, if someone would kindly explain to me why EBU is not keeping the max level of 5.1 streams at -3dBTP to allow for downmixing, I'm all ears. -1dBTP as the maximum seems a bit dangerous. Why not -0.1dBTP, then? Be brave!

If I was able to be at the IBC, I'd have some questions to ask.
TiagoJSilva is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2010   #5
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: London, UK
Posts: 560

Be interesting to see what the Beeb go with as they usually pretty much ignore the EBU.
tom_lowe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th September 2010   #6
Gear nut
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: Brussels
Posts: 120

I was at IBC and talked to Florian Camerer, chairman of the EBU PLOUD group. Apart from the documents mentioned by Tiago below, there are 2 other EBU technical documents 3343 and 3344 (almost ready) with guidelines for production and distribution of programmes in accordance with EBU R128.

R128 is in the final stages now and should see implementation with various european broadcasters in 2011.

-1dBTP was chosen because oversampling peak meters can still have a small margin of error with real peak reading (about 0.5dB).
Remember that there is still a lot of stereo sound production and the -1dBTP combined with the -23LUFS gives a lot more headroom than current methods.
One can argue about the ceiling for 5.1 in broadcast, to avoid downmix problems, but OTOH the goal is not to hit that ceiling all the time.

At the Dolby booth I talked to a Dolby rep about DMM2 and he said there were plans to implement R128 in 2011. It seems the logical thing to do, if they would like continue selling DMM2 (an already very interesting product, that I like for its features) in Europe.

BTW the short-term loudness time window is 3sec instead of the 4sec mentioned above. Momentary loudness is 400ms.

Greetings,

Thierry


Quote:
Originally Posted by TiagoJSilva View Post
I was under the impression that the final EBU recommendation for Loudness metering in Europe had less than 2 months! And it seems very different from ITU's recommendation.

Give Dolby a break, it's summer time, and I'll bet a lot of questions will be put to the EBU, for example, at the IBC. This may not be the final spec!

EBU R128 Loudness normalisation and permitted maximum level of audio signals
EBU Tech 3341 'EBU Mode' metering to supplement EBU R 128 loudness normalisation
EBU Tech 3342 Loudness range: A descriptor to supplement EBU R 128 loudness

Now, if someone would kindly explain to me why EBU is not keeping the max level of 5.1 streams at -3dBTP to allow for downmixing, I'm all ears. -1dBTP as the maximum seems a bit dangerous. Why not -0.1dBTP, then? Be brave!

If I was able to be at the IBC, I'd have some questions to ask.
thierryd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th September 2010   #7
Lives for gear
 
neilwilkes's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: London, England
Posts: 931

It still remains to be seen how many (and who) will take this up & implement it.
A BS kite does not necessarily make an adopted standard.......
we live in hope though, as the current situation is intolerable.
Every time I switch on the TV these days I have to have one hand on the volume dial.......the disparity is absolutely unbelievable.
__________________

Mixing,Mastering & Post Production
Surround Specialists (all formats)
Blu-Ray (Pure Audio Blu Ray & HDMV authoring)
DVD-Audio/DVD-Video Authoring (Music, Film & TV)
neilwilkes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th September 2010   #8
Gear Head
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 41

Quote:
Originally Posted by neilwilkes View Post
It still remains to be seen how many (and who) will take this up & implement it.
A BS kite does not necessarily make an adopted standard.......
we live in hope though, as the current situation is intolerable.
Every time I switch on the TV these days I have to have one hand on the volume dial.......the disparity is absolutely unbelievable.
The bigger question of course, and one that can't be forced by a standard, is if TV stations will affront their masters and measure the Leq(RLB) of advertisements, punching in the result as metadata on ingestion. I do not believe the TV networks have the guts to bite the hand that feeds them. They talk the talk, will they walk the walk?

Otherwise, you see where this is going: ads will be wide open at -1dBFS, crunched with L3 just like a CD.
TiagoJSilva is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th September 2010   #9
Gear addict
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 379

Quote:
Originally Posted by TiagoJSilva View Post
The bigger question of course, and one that can't be forced by a standard, is if TV stations will affront their masters and measure the Leq(RLB) of advertisements, punching in the result as metadata on ingestion. I do not believe the TV networks have the guts to bite the hand that feeds them. They talk the talk, will they walk the walk?

Otherwise, you see where this is going: ads will be wide open at -1dBFS, crunched with L3 just like a CD.
Not true and not possible. That is the purpose of the LUFS score. There is no way you can be livin' at -1dBFS and get a -23LUFS.

Here in the US, digital network television is currently proving that balanced levels throughout the broadcast and between stations is possible. Was anyone watching NFL opening weekend? Very balanced between program and spots. (LA, Time Warner - HD)
__________________
Nathan Dubin
Margarita Mix de Santa Monica
www.lastudios.com
nathand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th September 2010   #10
Gear Head
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 41

Quote:
Originally Posted by nathand View Post
Not true and not possible. That is the purpose of the LUFS score. There is no way you can be livin' at -1dBFS and get a -23LUFS.

Here in the US, digital network television is currently proving that balanced levels throughout the broadcast and between stations is possible. Was anyone watching NFL opening weekend? Very balanced between program and spots. (LA, Time Warner - HD)
I hope so. I certainly hope so. Has anyone seen the Gefen Auto Volume Stabilizer?
TiagoJSilva is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
VST Plug meassuring ITU-R BS.1770-1 Loudness? Franz Post Production forum! 18 8th November 2010 06:28 PM
ITU BS.1770 Meter Matti Mastering forum 3 2nd July 2009 10:52 AM
Is anyone mixing to "bs 1770"? Chadlington Post Production forum! 1 26th November 2008 09:19 AM
ITU-R BS.177 LEQ(a) vs LEQ(rlb) postprosound Post Production forum! 1 20th February 2008 06:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:08 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.