![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear interested Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 24
Thread Starter | Noise Reduction Workflow
I'm working with dialogue and wondering at what point are noise reduction plugins (e.g. xnoise, rx denoiser) usually used? For example, are people applying this destructively at the clip level before making edits, or in the effects bin on the track being edited? Something else? Is there a difference between "crossfading two denoised clips" and "denoising two crossfaded clips" ? How do people accomplish 2-pass noise reduction? At some point you have to be destructive right? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear addict Joined: Sep 2009 Location: San Francisco
Posts: 462
|
My method is to 1st up have a copy of all my 'clips' (either the AAf or OMF tracks) inactive & hidden in case I want to get another copy or check sync. Then going through choosing the mic/channel & trimming, scraping (aka fade in/out). A rough cut, if you will, of the pieces to listen what's there & what's missing. Next pass through is where I do the De-Noise, De-Clip, et al... when I have maybe found some air to fill with and found some other words/pieces to help smooth things. If possible I'll use an Audio-Suite or destructive process to cleanse pieces. When there's a lot of complex edits for "ah's" or clicks then I'll make a copy to fall back to & move that onto an 'X-Track'. Usually I'll have the 'air' handles as part of the piece being processed, unless it's going to need some EQ or other work to fill in. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2009 Location: C,Eh,N,Eh,D,Eh? "Sorry!"
Posts: 1,669
|
When do I usually apply noise-reduction? After my breakfast. (badum-pssh!) +1 to checking sync after hard processing. If I'm feeling really good about the edit at the time of NR, I'll do the whole 'piece' as one continuous file. BUT---you lose your handles when you hard process, so depending on your style of editing, I find it a real PITA to go drag a bit on either side, just to give myself 'room to finesse' in and out of the line before NR processing. Good luck. Jeff
__________________ "I'm not saving lives, I'm helping to put something up there on a screen for people to glance at between text messages." - Me. Partials: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0358864/ |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear interested Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 24
Thread Starter |
Thanks for the tips! Really helped improve my workflow on my last project. I hadn't even thought of checking sync after NR |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear addict Joined: Apr 2008 Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 412
|
Like up above, create muted/un-voiced duplicates of the material your gonna work on - for safety. I usually attempt to do a rough balance mix of the Dx tracks, then go in by scene or by worst offender and find the right mix of noise reduction to original - then save the setting with the name of the scene and movie so you can apply consistent NR to other clips. I usually pull out the handles a bit and then audiosuite (destructive), however, I usually go for a C4 (multiband expansion) first, as I find it generally works better than the x-noise stuff I have - no digititis. Although you can work it too hard and lose top end. Usually you have to make a call at how far to process, often times it's ok to have more original than you thought, especially when there's some ambiance or BG material to fill. Multi-pass usually means working the material two or three times, but less hard each time. I'd also suggest trying everything EXCEPT NR plugs first... i.e. EQ, expansion, leveling, alts etc. Then attack with NR if you need too.. also communicate with the director about ADR as well, nothing sucks as much as working your tail off then finding they're gonna loop the material
__________________ NuanceTone.com |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear addict Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 373
|
BUT IF you are going to use NR processing, most of the time you are better off doing that BEFORE applying any other kind of gain control (even destructive clip gain in PT). Any change in gain be it via a gain plugin or C4 or EQ if that is not consistent through the scene, then the noise floor will vary too much and the process becomes much more audible. Doing the NR before applying any other destructive processing is my suggestion. BUT NR processing can easily hurt you original recording, and its sometimes a little too easy to remove to much so the end result sounds lifeless or even extremely digital.
__________________ Europa Sound Production Euphonix 32 fader S5MC + stand alone MC, Nuendo x 7, Protools x 10 4 x VVTR, Avid Adrenaline, Final Cut Pro http://www.europasound.se |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear addict Joined: Mar 2009 Location: The O.C.
Posts: 479
| Now for something completly different...
Here's why I love the Fairlight for this sort of thing. I don't worry about making backups of the original material, it's done automatically where needed. I have 4 bands of clip based parametric EQ and gain that is real time non-destructive... so I can go back to any of it to tweak. If I use a NR plug-in, I always do it clip by clip. The Fairlight keeps the original clip available at all times in the layer underneath. I can instantly A/B the two at any time later to make sure I'm happy. Any EQ or gain processing caries to the new rendered clip on top, and can be tweaked as well. If I have a whole scene that is consistent for noise, I'll do a range bounce and drop, that will drop a new clip on top of the group. Then, I can apply NR to that - again having any part of the original available instantly and in sync. Yes, you may get some latency on clip based plug-ins, but you can quickly slide it back, because Fairlight lets you see both the upper and lower layer waveforms at the same time. If I want to go out to a standalone NR app, I have the bounced clip available, do the processing, and drop it back - again with all originals available in sync in the timeline. I could do 20 different versions and just rotate through them by popping each up to the top layer. Great for the undecided client... What's also cool about the clip based EQ is the it has gain of +20/-60dB, and a Q from .5 to 99 per band, plus Hi and Lo shelving. You also can store EQ settings globally on the system, so you can retrieve a specific EQ from a show 6 months ago, without loading that show or even having it on the drives. thumbsup
__________________ |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear addict Joined: Apr 2008 Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 412
|
Are you guys saying that PT will actually nudge the audio in an audiosuite bounce of a NR plugin. I'm amusing if this is true, ti means the audio in the region is nudged, not the region itself. Also, by some estimates - how much? |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Gear Head Joined: Jan 2007 Location: Ireland
Posts: 46
| Quote:
No pt doesn't nudge the audiosuite of any plugin. Bill was talking about the fairlight which seems to, due to it being clip based. No need to worry about sync when using audiosuite
__________________ G5 2.5Ghz,4GigRam,OS10.4.8,HD6,192,Sync,Mojo,D-Control,PT7.3.1,Waves Plat (Dell M70 2.13Ghz,Windows XP,1Gig Ram,DV Toolkit2, Mbox,Command 8,PT 7.3.1) | |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear addict Joined: Mar 2009 Location: The O.C.
Posts: 479
| Correct, and only if you are using a rendering/non-real time plug-in. The Fairlight has adjustable latency compensation like PT for realtime plugs. But, the shift, for instance on TC DeNoise, is no more than 1/2 frame, so for most dialog uses, it's not a worry.
|
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dolby 361 noise reduction - more noise than tape | Anderssvensson | Geekslutz forum | 13 | 2nd October 2009 06:48 PM |
| Noise reduction | jujumies | So much gear, so little time! | 2 | 26th March 2009 09:52 AM |
| RX Noise Reduction | soupking | Music computers | 3 | 15th March 2009 03:51 AM |
| Noise... Ground Issues... Noise Reduction Plugs | soundslikejoe | Low End Theory | 9 | 1st April 2007 09:01 PM |
| Noise Reduction? | jackinthebox | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 1 | 16th September 2006 11:56 PM |
| |