![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2005 Location: London, England
Posts: 931
Thread Starter | ReSampling - What rate?
I have a client who has suppliedme with a set of Audio files from Video captures. Here's the rub. Originally these were at 25fps. They recaptured at 24fps, and as a result the audio is the correct length compared to the video, but pitched down. I really do not fancy repitching (artifacts) and would rather use an internal Sample Rate Conversion, so the converted files play out at the correct pitch on export. Project details are 24fps, 48kHz. It is only the supplied audio that is the trouble here.......what rate do I convert it to, so that playing it out in a 48k project gets me the correct pitch please? Thanks Guys & Gals
__________________ Mixing,Mastering & Post Production Surround Specialists (all formats) Blu-Ray (Pure Audio Blu Ray & HDMV authoring) DVD-Audio/DVD-Video Authoring (Music, Film & TV) |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear addict Joined: Feb 2010 Location: London
Posts: 437
|
Well they went under a 4% slowdown, so i'm guessing a 4% pitch up which would be 46.08khz to get it to play faster in a 48khz session...... which makes little sense to me what so ever, only because i've never seen anyone do this before though..... can you even re-sample to any sample rate?... why not just pitch it up using a high quality processor like pitchntime?
Last edited by FullFrequency; 29th July 2010 at 03:44 PM.. Reason: terrible terrible maths going on |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2005 Location: London, England
Posts: 931
Thread Starter | Quote:
A - don't have Pitch n Time or ProTools. No intentions of buying ProTools either. B - pitch shifting will usually cause artifacts. The running time is correct but the pitch is off by (I think) a semitone or so. I will try resampling the file to 46.08kHz internally & see what happens, as this is the better way to go,. Resampling is simple enough - I have often read of this being done. PT can do it (not sure about the LE version) and Nuendo certainly can. I don't need the file to run longer, or necessarily faster - just at a higher pitch and resampling should do this. Thanks for the info! | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear addict Joined: Feb 2010 Location: London
Posts: 437
|
Ah ok.... i think though that by doing it that way you'll be changing the speed of the file, and not just the pitch, as the faster "clock speed" that the session's set to will just read the file faster due to it reading 48000 samples/second and you giving it a file that is 46080 samples..... That's why recordings made at 192khz are amazing to pull into a session that's running at 48k without converting for sound design purposes. FF |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Art of Resampling | Philly Stress | Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production | 3 | 13th August 2010 05:04 PM |
| what's 'resampling'? | loglady | Electronic Music Instruments & Electronic Music Production | 28 | 19th June 2010 12:05 PM |
| Overs after resampling | mdoelger | Mastering forum | 5 | 30th March 2008 04:14 AM |
| timestretching/resampling | hduncan | So much gear, so little time! | 5 | 11th October 2007 11:20 AM |
| Resampling | ClaySchmitt | Electronic Music Instruments & Electronic Music Production | 1 | 3rd October 2007 05:17 AM |
| |