![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 | |
| Gear nut Joined: Feb 2007 Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 122
Thread Starter | SuperMAX computers running OS X for less money than a Mac Pro? Is this email a joke?
Received this from a guy I bought a MacPro from on Ebay. He's gonna get his pants sued off right? Quote:
__________________ Eric Lalicata CAS Supervising Sound Editor Re-Recording Mixer Anarchy Post 1811 Victory Blvd Glendale, CA 91201 818-334-3300 www.anarchypost.net | |
| | |
| | #2 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2010 Location: London, UK
Posts: 560
| Quote:
If this guy doesn't do that, he's not braking any of Apple's rules. It'd be the same as all the people who make "Hackintoshes". Apple can't sue them all, but potentially they could be blocked by future OS updates. | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear nut Joined: Feb 2007 Location: San Francisco
Posts: 122
|
It all depends on exactly how they're getting the OS to boot. OS X uses hardware checks to verify that you are running on Apple hardware. I'm not sure exactly where in the computer this occurs. They may be taking existing Apple hardware and simply updating whatever components they can. If the chip that provides verification is separate from the CPU and cache, there's a good chance they can build a better machine (Apple hasn't updated the Mac Pros in a long time). At that point, they're running modified Apple hardware and that would be more legit than what others have tried. (There is still the possibility of conflicts between the OS/software and the newer chipsets on the market.) If they're emulating Apple's hardware checks or otherwise routing around them then yes, they will definitely get the pants sued off them. --Dave |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2009 Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 2,119
|
Laws on ownership states that once you buy something you can "Mod" it to your hearts content and sell it on for a lot more than you bought it for, what you cant do is make a copy of the modded whatever and sell it on... there are 2 ways to boot hackintosh's Darwin and boot-132 Darwin is illegal, boot-132 is completely legal, no hacking required... plus it works exactly like you would expect... Apparently, no one has come across any issues and you wont experience osx in any different way to people who paid the silly asking price for an apple mac (like me)... its like this, if you buy a legit copy of OSX and then load it using boot-132, you are not breaking any laws as you are not doing any "funny business" to the OSX software. the hardware side of things is YOURS, you have full ownership... and since you are not buying any of their hardware they cant say shit... EULA is just a scare, we have to know our rights... Think of it in this way, if you buy a text book and mke highlights on it and sell it onto another student with a 500% mark up, you are completely within your legal right to do that, but if you make photocopies of the highlighted text and try to sell multiple copies... be prepared for court... All SuperMAX has to do is make sure that no 2 computers share the same software and make sure every computer has had a legal copy of OSX installed... No EULA can stop you from doing that and selling the machines... its like how mod shops work... you can even mod the software once its installed but you just have to be honest about it and not call it an apple computer... Off Topic: What is really crazy is the fact that Apple realeased a update that messes up all the jailbreaked iPods... now jailbreak is an actual hack and is illegal, but because of the means that apple went about to get rid of jailbreakers (ie instead of suing the jailbreak community, they disabled them)... the jailbreaker community (UK) sued apple and won $25mil.... this is an extreme case because its the first time the hackers actually won... if apple has sued them instead of maliciously make the hackers life harder they would still be happy, now they lost 25mil (which they wont care about) but were forced to write an update so jailbreakers could go on hacking!!! Suda |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2006 Location: Carolina Guy
Posts: 719
|
"Apple Hardware" doesn't exist anymore. ALL of their parts are outsourced to, or designed by, the typical players; Intel, ATI, etc. My current machine has Intel mobo and Xeon processor. I have OSX on one hard drive and Windows 7 on another. Their is not a hardware check but there are certain combinations of motherboard/cpu that will boot with OSX. Google it.
__________________ Joe Miller http://www.soundslikejoe.com/ Machine: i7 950, Asus P6x58D-E, 12GB DDR3, 4x SATA, Radeon HD 4550, UAD-1, RME HDSP 9632 Controllers: CC121, Yamaha KX8, Axiom 49, Trigger Finger Software: Win7 64bit, Cubase 6, WavLab 7, EWQL stuff, NI stuff, other stuff |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Anyone running a Mac Pro / Pro Tools 8 LE rig? | michaiel | Music computers | 5 | 29th October 2009 06:49 PM |
| Linking two Mac Pro Computers ( MacPro ) | DanRock101 | Music computers | 1 | 25th June 2009 07:48 AM |
| This will probably end up in computers, but MAC to release 8 CORE Mac Pro | composer | So much gear, so little time! | 2 | 13th March 2007 08:56 AM |
| which Version of MacOXs are you running on a Mac Pro using Protools? | neon | Music computers | 2 | 13th January 2007 07:14 PM |
| |