DenOfGeek.com reports/comments on the growing problem of inaudible dialogue... - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Post Production forum!


DenOfGeek.com reports/comments on the growing problem of inaudible dialogue...

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 16th July 2010   #1
GS Community Manager
 
Whitecat's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: Surrey / London
Posts: 6,126

Thread Starter
Lightbulb DenOfGeek.com reports/comments on the growing problem of inaudible dialogue...

Discuss away!

The rising problem of inaudible dialogue - Den of Geek
Whitecat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th July 2010   #2
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Location: North Hollywood, CA
Posts: 668

It's bad enough to pay $9 for a feature film and the dialog is unintelligible, but worse is the nightly barrage of unintelligible dialog on prime time television.

Now I can rationalize bad dialog on reality TV where there are no budgets and in many cases, yesterday's barristas are producing and doing production sound, and re-recording mixers are often in a 10x10 room with a mouse and a pair of $300 speakers, but for prime time and major cable network dramas? Even after rewinding the DVR and turning up the volume a few notches, there often is jibberish coming out of the speakers.

I don't know if the problem is incompetent re-recording mixers, producers, production sound mixers, just not giving a damn or if this is happening somewhere in the broadcast chain, but I hope this trend is dealt with sometime soon.
__________________
Rick Sanchez
Post Haste Media, Inc.
11115 Magnolia Blvd.
North Hollywood, CA. 91601
818-232-7556
http://www.posthastemedia.com

Rick Sanchez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th July 2010   #3
Lives for gear
 
johndykstra's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,585

Man.

This issue needs addressing asap!

It's bad enough for those of us with normal hearing. Imagine being down 15-20 db @ 3k and trying to understand whats going on on CSI Miami. Impossible.
__________________
phantom power doesn't make your voice sound spooky
johndykstra is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 16th July 2010   #4
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,233

My wife is deaf in one ear so when we are watching TV we always have the subtitle option on. I turned it off one time when she was away visiting family. My hearing is good but that was an eye opener, dialogue is very difficult to hear on most things I see on broadcast TV or rented DVD's too. I turned the subtitles back on. I've thought there's been a dialogue mixing issue on a lot of stuff for years.
bkbirge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th July 2010   #5
Gear addict
 
iluvatar's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 365

Quote:
Originally Posted by dykstraster@gmai View Post
It's bad enough for those of us with normal hearing. Imagine being down 15-20 db @ 3k and trying to understand whats going on on CSI Miami. Impossible.
As if low dialog is the only reason to not watch CSI Miami.

-Dan.
iluvatar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th July 2010   #6
Lives for gear
 
johndykstra's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,585

Quote:
Originally Posted by iluvatar View Post
As if low dialog is the only reason to not watch CSI Miami.

-Dan.
fair enough. Not a fan either, but I do sell hearing aids, and this is the MOST complained about program.
johndykstra is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 16th July 2010   #7
Gear addict
 
Bill@AudioVision's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: The O.C.
Posts: 479

What I'm finding lately after watching a few episodes of season one of 'Lie to Me' on Netflix (streaming), is how much better the audio is compared to the broadcast version (OTA antenna - no cable/dish/etc.) I don't have anything fancy at home for TV audio, but it is distinctly better, especially dialog. The mixes sound more open, detailed, and dynamic. I'd love to know what they're using for the audio - an original stereo mix, or the +2 of a 5.1+2 Dolby E stream?
And yes, actors are mumbling more thanks to Carlton the Doorman...
__________________

Certified Fairlight phanatiks
AudioVision Production Services
www.AudioVisionPS.com
Bill@AudioVision is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th July 2010   #8
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 967

I've just finished picture editing a reality series. We produced it in HD this year but there was not the budget to do a 5.1 mix (the broadcaster didn't want to pay for it) so we stayed with a 2.0 mix. Hearing the mixes in my suite vs hearing them off air was interesting. The vo/dialgoue went down a few db in comparison to the mix supplied. I'm wondering if they ran it through some quasi 2.0 -> 5.1 conversion process which results in the center channel coming up lower?

It also make sme wonder if it's not necessarily the post chain that's causing the issues mentioned with dialogue.... maybe it's the ingest/conversion/encoding process at the networks?
__________________
______________________________________
In the land of the blind the one eyed man is king.
musikwerks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2010   #9
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: San Francisco area
Posts: 2,422

I'm sorry to say that on dramatic shows a good chunk of the problem is bad ACTING. Poor diction, no projection, Method Mumbling etc etc. Add indifferent location scouting (re sound) and even a good sound crew will have difficulties. Post can only mitigate those problems short of ADRing whole scenes, which is not going to happen in most episodics.

Philip Perkins
philper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2010   #10
Lives for gear
 
soundboy's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 655

I agree with Philip. I encountered this when I worked in theatrical sound. It was hell to get the actors to project to at least the 5th row! I'd tell them, "get it out to the 5th, and I'll take you to the rest of the theater." There is only so much gain before feedback. Also, if this thread were talking about film mixes listened to in actual theaters, I would think there is a problem. But since most of the complaints seem to be leveled at broadcast, all I can say is that there are so many variables between the final mix, and what finally reaches your TV, who can say what the problem is. I once had a show I mixed played on Showtime, and Showtime West at the same time. Showtime West sounded like my mix, Showtime had no high end and sounded garbled. It's out of my hands at that point.
__________________
Charles Dayton, CAS
Twisted Avocado Post Audio
Partial credits:
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0206743/
soundboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th July 2010   #11
Lives for gear
 
Jfriah's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: C,Eh,N,Eh,D,Eh? "Sorry!"
Posts: 1,669

Quote:
Originally Posted by philper View Post
I'm sorry to say that on dramatic shows a good chunk of the problem is bad ACTING. Poor diction, no projection, Method Mumbling etc etc. Add indifferent location scouting (re sound) and even a good sound crew will have difficulties. Post can only mitigate those problems short of ADRing whole scenes, which is not going to happen in most episodics.

Philip Perkins
Bing Bing Bing Bing Bing Bing!
Philip nailed it here.
CSI Miami = Caruso-isms and the cast that keeps pace with him.

Throw in some mumbly actors / quiet-talkers, combine it with noisy location sound, compress the mix for broadcast and there you have it.

Starts with the humans, goes through the technology and sometimes you're still left with junk.

Jeff
__________________
"I'm not saving lives, I'm helping to put something up there on a screen for people to glance at between text messages."
- Me.

Partials: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0358864/
Jfriah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th July 2010   #12
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1

Cool tv d log

I mix a lot of live tv,,,,and we started seeing problems poppin up all over the place that didnt relate to what was leaving my room/or on our air. the problem turned out to be that a lot of "enginners" a stations, cable joints, etc
are going to NAB, getting hammered and sold digital boxes that they have no
idea what they do----install. they never listen to the shit anyway,,,so they dont care. sorry first post here
funkgunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th July 2010   #13
Gear addict
 
BIGBANGBUZZ's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 369

Maybe some of the problems also lie in some drama's are mixed as they are being mixed like they were a film? too much dynamic range.
Mixed on a 5.1 system on massive speakers in a big room.

Maybe it would be best to mix drama made for TV in smaller rooms and also maybe the main mix should be stereo, leave the 5.1 for the DVD release.
95% of people are listening to a crappy speaker out of there LCD TV.

MY ex is always complaining she cant hear dialog very well out of her LCD TV.

I have always thought a 2.1 standard would be a better idea for TV, but ill leave that for another topic.

Drama TV including CSI sounds fine on my system but I have reasonable 5.1 set-up.

I remember when i worked on music you would always make sure the mix sounded fine on a crappy cassette player in someone's car stereo.
Maybe that method should be applied to sound for TV.
BIGBANGBUZZ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 20th July 2010   #14
Lives for gear
 
johndykstra's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,585

Quote:
Originally Posted by BIGBANGBUZZ View Post
leave the 5.1 for the DVD release.
From personal experience, I would HATE if this were to occur.

I sell hearing aids for a living. The number one complaint is television. You see, with a hearing loss, particularly one that goes untreated over time, something called "auditory deprivation" starts to kick in. Essentially, what this means, is after years of the brain not receiving information at say 4k, it stops looking for that information. Someone with a hearing loss that's been present for a number of years will start to lose clarity of speech. It's not rare that I get a patient in who can only repeat 50% of a phonetically balanced word list... regardless of the volume. This is in a quiet environment. Toss into the mix the masking effect of background noise (music, clapping, live environment) and this percentage drops even further.

I usually recommend a 5.1 system to these folks. For those who could really care less about anything but speech, I often recommend they really only need the center channel, but most will opt rather to set it unrealistically higher in balance. This has met great success, particularly since the switch to digital broadcast.

What would be great, is if the FCC or who ever is in charge of such things, would offer this as a setting, much like CC... so it could be built into existing sets in the menu options.
johndykstra is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 20th July 2010   #15
Gear maniac
 
BrettMorello's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: Belgium
Posts: 208

Funny how CSI Miami is an example.

I am Dutch speaking, and all American shows are being subtitled here. We often spoke among co-workers how in gods name those Americans can understand all the dialogue, and CSI Miani is one of the returning examples. Really, does this Caruso guy even opens his mouth? I actually pity the mixer who has to mix that.

I understand English very well, so I have no problems watching DVD's at home without the Dutch subtitles, but I always put the English one on.
__________________
www.protoolsforum.com
BrettMorello is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th July 2010   #16
Gear addict
 
BIGBANGBUZZ's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 369

Quote:
Originally Posted by dykstraster@gmai View Post
From personal experience, I would HATE if this were to occur.
Same here, but the facts are only a tiny percentage of the world own a 5.1 system.
I personally don't understand why people will spend thousands on a massive LCD or Plasma and not get a decent sound system to match.
BIGBANGBUZZ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 30th July 2010   #17
Gear Head
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 41

Quote:
Originally Posted by BIGBANGBUZZ View Post
Same here, but the facts are only a tiny percentage of the world own a 5.1 system.
I personally don't understand why people will spend thousands on a massive LCD or Plasma and not get a decent sound system to match.
It's the Wife Acceptancy Factor, of course!

A Panel TV has a huge WAF compared to a big CRT, so what do you think that happens with 5 speakers all around the room, the cables to feed them and a big box for the subwoofer, all cluttering up the living room?

Even if they stay in the room, they'll get vases of flowers on top, to liven them up.
TiagoJSilva is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
best "inaudible/discreet" reverb for that "dry" sound Field Marshall So much gear, so little time! 14 4th August 2009 08:45 PM
Money Growing on Trees? cojo67 Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc 4 10th February 2009 08:36 AM
Gear Growing Feet mrsteaks Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 10 21st August 2007 06:53 PM
slut growing beard kroad High end 3 10th August 2004 11:09 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:57 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.