![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear nut Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 141
Thread Starter | Soundtrack in a box - Stems?
I'm finishing a small budget feature where I created almost everything in Pro Tools - like, I was trying to be a whole post audio team myself (besides composing the music). I think it went well, considering. But this means everything is in one Pro Tools session. Would there be any advantage to making stems and using them to create the master audio file if I'm not going to alter the mix?
|
| | |
| | #2 | |
| Gear Guru Joined: Jan 2004 Location: out in the dirt.
Posts: 15,625
| Quote:
__________________ Charles Maynes credits Charles' webpage "Better the Arabs do it tolerably than that you do it perfectly. It is their war, and you are to help them, not to win it for them." T.E. Lawrence today is a good day to make your obituary better.... General Smedley Butler- WAR IS A RACKET American Rhetoric: Dwight D. Eisenhower - Farewell Address | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear nut Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 141
Thread Starter |
Thanks! I should have said that for now, we're making the discs ourselves for festival submissions. I plan to eventually have everything routed to their respective stems tracks, but for now there are a few music cues in the Foley tracks if you know what I'm sayin'. So is there any advantage to bounce to stems then bounce to a master? It's just 2-channel stereo. I believe that some people would recommend running the mix through an analog board at some point. Would this be when creating the stems? Or would the stems be mixed analog into a master after they have been bounced in Pro Tools? |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear Guru Joined: Jan 2004 Location: out in the dirt.
Posts: 15,625
|
I would personally suggest getting your tracks squared away so if anything happens someone can trust your work without having any surprises. I am not a re-recording mixer very much, but I personally feel a trip to analog land isnt going to make anything sound better. I would just stay in the digital domain myself. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear addict Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 373
|
Well I am a re-recording mixer (although a lot of my time is also spent as a sound editor) I would not go to analog for any silly suming bus idiocy, I might consider it if someone would through a lot of cash at me and say, spend it! Then I might run the dialog premix over to mag with SR and back again (still no plugins can create that magical tapecompression imho), but as that doesnt really happen I'll just stay digital all the way.
__________________ Europa Sound Production Euphonix 32 fader S5MC + stand alone MC, Nuendo x 7, Protools x 10 4 x VVTR, Avid Adrenaline, Final Cut Pro http://www.europasound.se |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Stems from the DAW?? How do you use your summing box... | Bierce85 | So much gear, so little time! | 1 | 2nd May 2011 07:38 PM |
| Stems ???? | mikevarela | Post Production forum! | 4 | 19th July 2008 09:22 AM |
| Export Stems PT HD | AudioFields | High end | 3 | 5th November 2007 09:37 PM |
| Stems? | astronmr20 | Mastering forum | 49 | 9th October 2006 02:22 AM |
| Stems | ron florentine | Q&A with Michael H. Brauer | 3 | 29th September 2005 06:57 PM |
| |