Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Post Production forum!

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 21st December 2009, 05:25 PM   #1
Subversounds
Gear addict
 
Subversounds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Rio de Janeiro
Posts: 487
Good Enough to go Pro?

Hi,

In the begining of 2009 i was pre-hired to do sound design and soundtrack for a PC game. It was a small company and in the end of 2009 they've got no funds to finish the game (Brasil business-making is hell).

I've made quick demos for them, they loved and since it was a small company, i don't have a clue if the songs were acceptable for professional sound designer/soundtracking. I've done lots of small works (audio books, institutional videos and so).

But what do you think, are these demos good enough to get small soundtrack job in the pro market?


obs: please listen to this as demos not close to a finished sound.

Novo Tema 8.mp3

Nova Intro MP3.mp3
__________________
I am an avid Cubase user. It really gives the pro tools i wanted. It is just plain logic. There is no reason to play the reaper bashing everything that pops into your sonar. After all, you want your performer to be the best garage band ever, the peak of all live performances. So you should have the audacity to stop with your sound forgeries, childish innuendoes and acid comments. Recycle your ideas and bring that ardour for music back to your life!
Subversounds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st December 2009, 09:41 PM   #2
soundfx
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 216
Here's my honest assessment, and it may sting a little. Sorry. :) And perhaps these tracks will sound different when not demos, but I have to critique what you posted.

They sound very robotic, quantized and lacking any dynamics whatsoever. The sounds and mixing lack any real depth, and the phrasing isn't very interesting. MIDI-based orchestration requires a great deal of finesse and attention to detail in order to even remotely come close to the real thing. You need to "humanize" timings, velocity, pannings, etc. So do I think you could get composing jobs with this caliber of composition?...nope. But you know how to do basic programming and can continue to learn and improve and perhaps one day be able to compete. I hate to sound negative, but sugar-coating wont help you. There are too many people doing too many jobs out there that sound way way better than this. I'm sure you could hone your craft by doing free gigs for a while though. Try going to this link (if you don't already go to soundsonline) and listening to the sort of things some of your competition is doing.

Music Cafe - Soundsonline-Forums

Granted, a few are dreadful, but many, as you will hear, employ a nice level of dynamics, phrasing, and depth. There are tons and tons of composers hungry for work so you really need to step it up in order to compete.
soundfx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st December 2009, 11:54 PM   #3
Subversounds
Gear addict
 
Subversounds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Rio de Janeiro
Posts: 487
Quote:
Originally Posted by soundfx View Post
Here's my honest assessment, and it may sting a little. Sorry. :) And perhaps these tracks will sound different when not demos, but I have to critique what you posted.

They sound very robotic, quantized and lacking any dynamics whatsoever. The sounds and mixing lack any real depth, and the phrasing isn't very interesting. MIDI-based orchestration requires a great deal of finesse and attention to detail in order to even remotely come close to the real thing. You need to "humanize" timings, velocity, pannings, etc. So do I think you could get composing jobs with this caliber of composition?...nope. But you know how to do basic programming and can continue to learn and improve and perhaps one day be able to compete. I hate to sound negative, but sugar-coating wont help you. There are too many people doing too many jobs out there that sound way way better than this.
Thanks for the comments. That is what i always think. I'm way better recording people than composing themes. But i love to write :-D
For now, i'll stick to 'easier' rock n roll and left discriptive music for the future, i'm still young.
__________________
I am an avid Cubase user. It really gives the pro tools i wanted. It is just plain logic. There is no reason to play the reaper bashing everything that pops into your sonar. After all, you want your performer to be the best garage band ever, the peak of all live performances. So you should have the audacity to stop with your sound forgeries, childish innuendoes and acid comments. Recycle your ideas and bring that ardour for music back to your life!
Subversounds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd December 2009, 12:13 AM   #4
kylesoundman
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 9
Search up Nick Phoenix in google. he has done some of the most amazing VST audio for video scoring I have ever heard. He also founded Quantum Leap...im sure you know how amazing their VST instuments sound if you have dabbled in the scoring for video at all.

That said....instead of hanging it up go listen to some of his work and then give thsoe demos another crack and postem up! I can't think of a better example of audio for video than his work to be influenced by!
kylesoundman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd December 2009, 02:02 AM   #5
soundfx
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 216
Yeah, I didn't mean to be too discouraging, just trying to bring some reality in to the picture and point out what could be improved. There's alway room and time to figure out what's not working and fix it. Keep at it. :)
soundfx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd December 2009, 04:01 AM   #6
The MPCist
Lives for gear
 
The MPCist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,541
Let me bring another opinion to the table. You don't have to be 'good enough' to be pro.

I know a lot of 'pros' who really aren't that good.

It's a mixture of talent, luck, and money. Being at the right place and the right time is what launched many a career and they started off 'not so good' but learned as they worked and most became 'good' and even a few 'awesome'.

So keep it up if it's what you eat and breathe -- keep honing your talent no matter what. Who knows...?
__________________
THE MPCIST
I love analog
The MPCist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd December 2009, 08:29 AM   #7
jsbeeth
Gear nut
 
jsbeeth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 123
In addition to the above, don't forget about the nuts and bolts issues of composition either -- melodic construction, harmonic content/voice leading, orchestration/arrangement, etc. Maybe see if you can take some lessons with a composer/theorist in your area and do some analysis of the classical repertoire with respect to these musical parameters, and of course, practice writing your own pieces with continuous critical feedback.

This is a heavy disclipine unto itself separate from all the 'tech' issues like midi programming etc, and really requires its own practice and experience.

Good luck!
__________________
"From the heart, may it go to the heart" -- Beethoven

http://www.myspace.com/joshlava
jsbeeth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd December 2009, 04:31 PM   #8
Subversounds
Gear addict
 
Subversounds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Rio de Janeiro
Posts: 487
Thanks for all the comments fellas :-D

I'm already on piano and harmony lessons (the last classes of that i took i was 13 years old and not that interested).

Doing this minor demo soundtrack for this game and sound design for three books (explosions, splashes, awkwar noises, steps and so...) was one of the best times i had in the music business.

I'll search for Mr. Phoenix. Sounds promising.
__________________
I am an avid Cubase user. It really gives the pro tools i wanted. It is just plain logic. There is no reason to play the reaper bashing everything that pops into your sonar. After all, you want your performer to be the best garage band ever, the peak of all live performances. So you should have the audacity to stop with your sound forgeries, childish innuendoes and acid comments. Recycle your ideas and bring that ardour for music back to your life!
Subversounds is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
logic pro 6, any good? pjplayer Music computers 5 10th November 2008 05:12 AM
What good are Pro midi files now? Jay- Electronic Music Instruments & Electronic Music Production 11 6th October 2008 10:34 PM
SM Pro Audio gear - any good? headwerkn Low End Theory 28 24th May 2008 03:12 PM
Beat out of the MPC's stereo out : sounds good!!! tracked in pro tools : not so good hitsville Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 61 31st May 2006 12:37 AM
Pro Tools Pro school training, is it a good thing? FOURTHTUNZ High end 14 13th August 2003 02:48 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:41 PM.

 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0