![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2007 Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 1,410
Thread Starter | Help with Lav gain structure
I was hoping someone could give me some advice about the proper gain structure when using a wireless lav. I’ll admit I really don’t have any experience using wireless mics/Lavs and am kinda trying to apply “studio” knowledge so I may be over/under thinking this all. I did do a search but didn’t find the info I was looking for. A friend loaned me a LECTROSONICS UM200 pack and a UCR210D receiver and I downloaded the manuals from the website to get started. I adjusted the trim on the mic pack until it only occasional lit the red light during normal volumes (as it said to do in the manual). I noticed, however, that BOTH red lights lit up on the receiver (which the manual says is an indication of limiting/peaking) long before the red light on the mic pack illuminated! It makes me wonder which I should be watching… I’m assuming the receiver’s LEDs as the mic pack won’t be visible when hidden on the talent. Aas far as I understand it - the LEVEL switch on the back of the receiver (-20, 0, +8) relates to the scale of the knob on the front… -20 equals a scale of -50 to -20, 0 equals 0 to +30 and the +8 is a “fixed output” is that correct? If the receiver is plugged in to a mixer (then on to a camera line in) what would be the proper level to set the output switch to? If it is important, let’s say the operating level of the editing system I would be transferring this in to would be at -12 or -20. I don’t think I should be adding/subtracting output gain - shouldn’t that be done with the mixer? So... does this “gain structure” make sense: LAV (adjusted until one red light on RECIEVER lights irregardless of the mic pack) with 0 gain from the receiver in to the mixer then the mixer line out in to the camera line in - monitoring the return from the camera on the mixer? Perhaps I’m all wrong - happy to find that out too! As with all recording, I’ll use my ears to judge BUT I’d feel a little bit better knowing that I wasn’t totally destroying my headroom, frequency response, etc. Thanks for your help… Mark |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear nut Joined: Jun 2008 Location: nyc
Posts: 91
|
you might consider posting this question over on r.a.m.p.s. or jwsound.net. there are primarily location mixers on those sites who can probably best answer your question. -greg- |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2007 Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 1,410
Thread Starter |
thanks - will do!
|
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New to Logic 8 - Gain Structure? | RMcFarland | Music computers | 10 | 13th February 2008 08:23 AM |
| gain structure???? | chasman | So much gear, so little time! | 33 | 30th October 2007 02:12 AM |
| Gain structure - Please Read | Pollyrythm | Electronic Music Instruments & Electronic Music Production | 17 | 2nd October 2007 10:36 PM |
| PT Gain structure and calibration. | Wiggy Neve Slut | Q&A with Michael H. Brauer | 1 | 21st September 2005 01:22 PM |
| DJ Mixing - Gain structure | explorer | So much gear, so little time! | 0 | 19th August 2005 10:39 AM |
| |