![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Auto Tune 5 Sync Issues | Sender | Music computers | 0 | 11th February 2008 05:12 AM |
| Bus and sync issues? | 807Recordings | Music computers | 0 | 3rd December 2007 10:23 AM |
| Motu Ultralight re-record sync issues | boody | Low End Theory | 3 | 21st August 2007 05:04 PM |
| Midi Sync Issues with Sonar... | basscakes | Electronic Music Instruments & Electronic Music Production | 0 | 6th June 2007 06:22 PM |
| mpc 1000/ pt sync issues | halfguard | Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production | 5 | 20th December 2005 05:33 AM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 278
| 2 sync issues 1) I'm getting ready for another session that will be a 'making of' for DVD, so we are using behind the scenes footage, and the actual feature - and I've only got a few parts of the puzzle so far. The feature's master video is on HDCam running at 23.976 separated into reels - with a guide track, which has been dubbed to DVCProHD with the same timecode, then ingested into Final Cut Pro at 29.97 NDF. I have the D/M/E and surround stems for each reel from the stage as Pro Tools sessions, this timecode is at 29.97 NDF with a .1% pulldown via Sync I/O. I won't have the video to cut to for another few days. But, I did have to provide OMF's from the Pro Tools sessions for our video editor of the reels - which I'm hoping will be in sync. So here's the question: Was the .1% pulldown on the Sync likely for the film printmaster? I will eventually find out by trial and error but I'd like to have an idea before the session begins, and I can't get ahold of the studio that made them. If my sync does drift, I should be able to use the TC/E audiosuite to perform the .1% correct? Since all of my behind the scenes audio will be at the proper rate, I don't want to pull my whole session down to with the Sync I/O. 2) Recently I mixed a few HD (720P 59.94) commercials - being up-resed to 1080i for final delivery. My SD Quicktime video ref had a 59.94 timecode burn in and ProTools HD recognized the frame rate fine. But I can't set the sessions frame rate to that. Luckily, these were :30 spots and I didn't have to spot effects, and the clients didn't mind. So how are you all dealing with 59.94? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 128
| When working at 59.94 I leave everything set to 29.97 I was once told that since 59.94 is simply 2x 29.97 that they can be thought of as the same thing. So far so good. N8 |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 278
| Sounds good to me, although say I need to spot an effect at 01:23:04:50 ??? I don't have this option with my timeline set to 29.97. Thats where I'm worried I'll run into a problem. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 278
| Just answered my own questions I think. Someone correct me if I'm wrong here: - .1% pulldown is from film to video, +.1% pull UP is for video to film, so... the pulldown on my project is likely for the video transfer, thus I should audiosuite those files since I will not be returning to film. Also, I just noticed the timecode 2 rate can be set to 59.94, but not timecode 1. - so I still can't spot to 59.94 according to the manual. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,365
| im a little confused... did you say a 29.97 non drop and on top a pull down or is it already dropped to 29.97? the OMF come from a sound studio or from a video editor? or was it a pro tools session? is the end result be a 23.98 or 29.97D or non drop? |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,365
| yep. true that |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 278
| The master tapes were 23.976 -> dubbed and ingested into Final Cut at 29.97 ND. The sound I have is the Pro Tools sessions from the dub stage Time Code rate is 29.97 ND - under session setup it's being pulled down .1% via the Sync I/O - so my actual session is running at 47.952. And my question was... was that pulldown so it will be in sync with the videotape transfer, or the film (which is the feature's final delivery). Now, from re-reading some books, I've figured out this pulldown must be for the video transfer. So, I've disabled the session pulldown, used Audiosuite to perform the pulldown, and created omf's of each reel for our video editor. Now when he's done editing, hopefully all will be well for the mix with no pulldowns necessary. Our final delivery is 29.97 ND. And I'm still have trouble believing I can't get 59.94 on the Big Counter... but that's what the manual says. I only have a SYNC I/O, is this where the SYNC HD comes into play? I suppose if I need to spot in reference to my video's burn in I can set the session to 29.97, grid values to 1/2 frame, and then I'll sort of be at 59.94. Or am I over thinking this? |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 58
| 59.94 is not a frame rate, it's a "field rate". This term is used when the hd masters are interlaced instead of progressive. Since there are two fields for every interlaced frame, 59.94 = 29.97. You can not spot to a field only to a frame. TC does not count in fields, only frames (and subframes). Also, when dealing with .1% pulls, it is better to do a sample rate convert by importing the tracks into a new session and applying the correct source sample rate conversion. Audio suite will be close and may work when you have few regions and files. If you have many files to convert it is easier and more accurate to do it on import.
__________________ Eric Lalicata C.A.S. Supervising Sound Editor Re-Recording Mixer Anarchy Post 1811 Victory Blvd Glendale, CA 91201 818-334-3300 www.anarchypost.net |
| | |
| | #9 | ||
| Gear maniac Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 278
| Quote:
Quote:
| ||
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: minneapolis, mn
Posts: 1,114
| ask the editor to give you a 29.97 video. if you PLACE something at a frame, it will still playback properly relative to real time. no one will tell you to spot something at frame 50. just spot something again picture until it LOOKS right. import tracks, select SRC, then the appropriate source rate for your conversion. why no Sync I/O?
__________________ tom hambleton C.A.S. I CAN'T BELIEVE HOW GOOD THAT MIX LOOKS! ministry of fancy noises |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 278
| Thanks minister, I will ask for 29.97 if possible in the future. As for Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Gear Head Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 58
| Quote:
In either case, if they are giving you a SD video to work with as you said in your post, then the tc burn should reflect the frame rate of the video they give you. In this case, you should have two burns, one for 59.94 and one for 29.97. The important thing here, is that there is no speed change between the two. As far as the Varicam is concerned, shooting 59.94 is usually reserved for "overcranking" for the slo mo effect when played back at 29.97. The Varicam always records to tape at 60 frames per second, regardless of frame rate setting. When the operator sets the camera to 23.98, or 29.97 they are telling the camera which frames to "flag" within the 60 fps that will be "extracted" by the NLE system for actual cutting. The camera can be set to record 59.94 fps with no flags, but I do not know why one would do this. I was not aware that people are cutting at 59.94. This is technically possible, but again I am not sure why they would. But I am not a DP, just a sound mixer. Long story short, 59.94 and 29.97 run at the same speed but are displayed differently based on the medium. We work on "HD" films all the time and they are always 23.98. I'd like to know why your stuff was 59.94.
__________________ Eric Lalicata C.A.S. Supervising Sound Editor Re-Recording Mixer Anarchy Post 1811 Victory Blvd Glendale, CA 91201 818-334-3300 www.anarchypost.net | |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 278
| Good lord. Eric thanks for the clarification. There is simply an overwhelming amount of information to know! |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: minneapolis, mn
Posts: 1,114
| just picking up on what EL said..... is your editor relatively new to HD? you can create a 59.94 sequence in FCP. and it is likely that s/he simply output a TC burn from his sequence.
__________________ tom hambleton C.A.S. I CAN'T BELIEVE HOW GOOD THAT MIX LOOKS! ministry of fancy noises |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 278
| My usual editor isn't... but the one who gave me the Quicktime is new to HD. I spent a LOT of time fixing his mistakes, so it wouldn't supprise me if he did something out of the norm. |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: minneapolis, mn
Posts: 1,114
| Set Time Code 2 in the session setup window to 59.94 and reveal that track in the Edit window.
__________________ tom hambleton C.A.S. I CAN'T BELIEVE HOW GOOD THAT MIX LOOKS! ministry of fancy noises |
| | |
| | #17 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 278
| update Now that I have picture, I checked sync after using Audiosuite Timeshift (Film to NTSC -.1% down) it DID NOT LINE UP the same way using the SYNC I/O did to pull down the session. So a WARNING to everyone: DO NOT USE AUDIOSUITE TO DO POST FORMAT CONVERSIONS!!! IT'S NOT ACCURATE ENOUGH!!! - for an 18 minute reel, Audiosuite was off more than 5 frames from picture stop. Instead, use import session data feature that joe milner describes: Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #18 | |
| Gear Head Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 58
| Quote:
__________________ Eric Lalicata C.A.S. Supervising Sound Editor Re-Recording Mixer Anarchy Post 1811 Victory Blvd Glendale, CA 91201 818-334-3300 www.anarchypost.net | |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 278
| Eric, re-reading I see that you did. For whatever reason I failed to grasp the importance of your advice. I wish I had done that to begin with... but as you say, now I've learned the hard way Audiosuite is inaccurate. |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |