![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2006 Location: El Pueblo de Nuestra Senora La Reina de Los Angeles de Porciuncula
Posts: 3,622
Thread Starter | Best video codec to work in ProTools
i am exporting mjpeg A to work oncomputers using PT version 6.9 in OSX and version 7.2. in OSx.4 it seems to work and has been for a while but i want to know if anyone else uses other codecs for video in PT that might be better. does DV do a better job and if so what settings? or any other codec but please give the settings cause there are way too many! thanks |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear interested Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6
|
Hi, Not sure if you are outputting to an external monitor, but, we use a Canopus for output, which requires a DV compression. Using QT Pro to export whatever flavor client gives me, settings are... DV/DVC Pro NTSC ( or PAL depending on where you are ) 640 x 480 Medium quality works just fine. Hope this helps. JA |
| | |
| | #3 |
| GS Community Manager |
DV seems to put the least amount of pressure on your CPU when it comes to PT playback. anything I've done has been DV of some flavour, of varying quality, but as long as the frame rate matches everything is cool.
|
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2006 Location: El Pueblo de Nuestra Senora La Reina de Los Angeles de Porciuncula
Posts: 3,622
Thread Starter | Quote:
there is DVpro ntsc 25 and 50 iwhich one is better for pt? or whats the differnce? | |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| GS Community Manager | Quote:
For PT - the best option, if you're working with NTSC, is simply DV/DVCPRO NTSC - it's the same codec, same bandwidth. In PAL it's just DV-PAL. The difference is in the frame/field rate, but you should be working with whatever framerate the project you're mixing/scoring/whatever is posting in. | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear addict Joined: Feb 2007 Location: Chicago
Posts: 497
|
If the footage wasn't shot in DVC PRO 50, don't bother converting it to that format. regular old DV will look great.
|
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2006 Location: El Pueblo de Nuestra Senora La Reina de Los Angeles de Porciuncula
Posts: 3,622
Thread Starter |
thanks
|
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear addict Joined: Nov 2006 Location: Marin County, CA, USA
Posts: 495
|
I usually ask for Motion JPEG-A 640x480 (or 320x240 if it makes it easier for the client to send a smaller file and a grungy work print is OK with everyone). DV may be better quality and slightly less CPU taxing, but the file size is way bigger which can be annoying for transfer when you are dealing with six reels. Of course Canopus, which I do not use, requires DV. I ask that the dialog/ production sound be panned hard left and editor's music/ temp FX be panned hard right. I also ask for an academy leader, tail pop, and F+F window burn (or timecode). Usual stuff. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2007 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 655
|
I use a Mojo, so I ask for DV25, and sometimes thats what I get! If I have time I stick it in Media Station and transcode it to MXF, that way it is truly frame accurate with the mojo. Otherwise, there is always an offset.
__________________ Charles Dayton, CAS Twisted Avocado Post Audio Partial credits: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0206743/ |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Do I absolutely positively NEED DV Toolkit to work with video in PT? | MusicManChild | Music computers | 4 | 19th October 2006 11:25 AM |
| ProTools Video Capability?? | danno812 | High end | 40 | 6th June 2006 02:22 AM |
| Protools LE, DV toolkit, Digitranslator, SMPTE, and video sync | Jeff16years | So much gear, so little time! | 16 | 30th May 2006 01:35 AM |
| I sAnyone Using Linux For Audio or Video Work? | Rusty.Potts | So much gear, so little time! | 10 | 16th April 2006 01:31 AM |
| |