23rd August 2012
|
#1 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 868
Thread Starter | SoZo Capacitors Home Studio |
| |
23rd August 2012
|
#2 | | Lives for gear
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,222
|
Why did you build a non-load bearing double wall with two major flanking paths? I assume you might not need the higher STC to track correctly?
|
| |
23rd August 2012
|
#3 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 868
Thread Starter |
Acording to John Sayers
Staggered Studs. Here you use two studs for each side of the wall. The plasterboard on one side is attached to one stud and the plaster on the other side is attached to the other stud. The two studs are connected to a common base and top plate.
This will be an STC of 48
Staggered stud wall construction with 1 layer of 16mm(5/8") Plasterboard on studs of 95x35mm (4 x 11/2") on a 120mm (4 3/4")common base.
|
| |
23rd August 2012
|
#4 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 868
Thread Starter |
I could easily double the sheetrock and have 2 5/8ths layers on each side of the wall briging the STC to 54, would this make a huge difference ?
|
| |
23rd August 2012
|
#5 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Nov 2010 Location: Canada
Posts: 242
|
Looks awesome!
What are those two small bits of pipe doing in the last picture? Cable runs?
__________________ |
| |
23rd August 2012
|
#6 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 868
Thread Starter | Quote:
Originally Posted by .:On The Rock:. Looks awesome!
What are those two small bits of pipe doing in the last picture? Cable runs? | im running into my house with a 24 channel , my house is 50 x 30 ten foot ceilings...
|
| |
23rd August 2012
|
#7 | | Lives for gear
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,222
| Quote:
Originally Posted by SoZo I could easily double the sheetrock and have 2 5/8ths layers on each side of the wall briging the STC to 54, would this make a huge difference ? | No, because the sound will pass through the floor and ceiling. The only STC that wall will achieve is in the mid band and high band. The bass might have an STC of 12 with the addition of your wall, if adding green glue and drywall maybe 15. One flanking path will basically cut the STC in half, with large bass. The wall you built is good, but the STC rating you quoted is for the wall only, assuming no other flanking paths.
|
| |
24th August 2012
|
#8 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 868
Thread Starter | Quote:
Originally Posted by OpusOfTrolls No, because the sound will pass through the floor and ceiling. The only STC that wall will achieve is in the mid band and high band. The bass might have an STC of 12 with the addition of your wall, if adding green glue and drywall maybe 15. One flanking path will basically cut the STC in half, with large bass. The wall you built is good, but the STC rating you quoted is for the wall only, assuming no other flanking paths. | Floor is Concrete and pergo... I dont think much will go through the floor? What can I do with the Ceiling? It is very open gable above with basic tempature insulation
|
| |
24th August 2012
|
#9 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 868
Thread Starter | |
| |
31st August 2012
|
#10 | | Lives for gear
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,222
|
Hi, sorry if I might have been a bit of a downer, but I do think your wall should be okay. If you are worried about low frequency bleed from the control to tracking room, you can always monitor with a EQ set to trim down the lows a bit. But I doubt it's a problem.
Also, for future reference, STC refers to the transmission loss of speech frequencies. Transmission Loss is the general term for the reduction of sound transmission.
The flanking paths in your studio would have costed a fortune to fix anyway. The ceiling is the primary culprit, as also looks the frontwall of your CR. In almost all circumstances, the CR and TR are designed to not be coupled, but in your situation you will just have to make the best of what you have.
|
| |
31st August 2012
|
#11 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 868
Thread Starter | Quote:
Originally Posted by OpusOfTrolls Hi, sorry if I might have been a bit of a downer, but I do think your wall should be okay. If you are worried about low frequency bleed from the control to tracking room, you can always monitor with a EQ set to trim down the lows a bit. But I doubt it's a problem.
Also, for future reference, STC refers to the transmission loss of speech frequencies. Transmission Loss is the general term for the reduction of sound transmission.
The flanking paths in your studio would have costed a fortune to fix anyway. The ceiling is the primary culprit, as also looks the frontwall of your CR. In almost all circumstances, the CR and TR are designed to not be coupled, but in your situation you will just have to make the best of what you have. | Thanks for the clarity and time to post. The ceiling is the only flanking culprit as the floor and walls are solid concrete and only one side if the walls stud is actually connected to the concrete walls, the other is floating and will be caulked tight . I will have to try it out and see first.
|
| |
31st August 2012
|
#12 | | cork sniffer
Joined: Dec 2009 Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 1,530
|
The offset stud is good...I built my old room in a very similar manner...BUT...I would add more mass to the walls personally. On at least one side I would put MDF over the studs, then the drywall over that. Sealing the window is critical too. I planned on a double pane dealio...but I got an old glass shower divider for free that was 3/4" thick...it ended up perfect for my needs. I had a few leaks and they showed up right away. A bit of caulk to help my gasket did the trick.
|
| |
31st August 2012
|
#13 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jan 2007 Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,280
|
I think the Pergo floor will be a huge problem. Possibly a bigger problem than the ceiling. Sound from the speakers, your chair rolling around, etc. in the CR will go straight through the floor and travel up every mic stand in the live room. Pergo transmits sound AMAZINGLY well. There is a quick/easy/cheap fix though, and that's just to set a shallow depth on a circular saw and cut a small gap in the floor right up next to the wall to isolate the control room Pergo from the live room Pergo. You can cover the gap with some baseboad and quarter-round for cosmetics so it's not visible. Then the only thing transmitting through the floor will have to go through the concrete and that's got a lot of mass so it won't be that big of a deal unless you are really cranking the sound (in which case your wall and ceiling won't keep up anyway).
I agree that adequately dealing with the floor and ceiling would probably be cost-prohibitive for this build.
|
| |
31st August 2012
|
#14 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 868
Thread Starter | Quote:
Originally Posted by chris carter I think the Pergo floor will be a huge problem. Possibly a bigger problem than the ceiling. Sound from the speakers, your chair rolling around, etc. in the CR will go straight through the floor and travel up every mic stand in the live room. Pergo transmits sound AMAZINGLY well. There is a quick/easy/cheap fix though, and that's just to set a shallow depth on a circular saw and cut a small gap in the floor right up next to the wall to isolate the control room Pergo from the live room Pergo. You can cover the gap with some baseboad and quarter-round for cosmetics so it's not visible. Then the only thing transmitting through the floor will have to go through the concrete and that's got a lot of mass so it won't be that big of a deal unless you are really cranking the sound (in which case your wall and ceiling won't keep up anyway).
I agree that adequately dealing with the floor and ceiling would probably be cost-prohibitive for this build. | Thats a great idea. I can easily cut the pergo...
|
| |
13th October 2012
|
#15 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jan 2009 Location: Canada
Posts: 1,394
|
A few questions from someone who is currently building a similar installation:
1- How do you ensure that the Roxul (rock wool) insulation will not fall "back into the wall" ? Does it just stay there on its own supported by the friction of it against the studs?
2- Does rock wool seem to give anyone a hard time breathing-wise, and skin-wise, does it irritate you?
3- What would be recommended to insulate (acoustically, obviously) a ceiling which is just made of 12 inch I-beams? My first plan is to put rock wool between each and put drywall (gyproc) over that. But hen I thought about this: Sound is conducted by any surface that vibrates, therefore the gyproc on the celing will vibrate and transfer these vibrations to the I-beam, which in turn transfer them tto the floor of my living rooom, etc..
What is the best way (least amount of material is my main factor) to insulate a ceiling? (keep in mind I have only four inches to spare, vertically from the surface of each I-beam)
Thank you all!
__________________ Not GerANIUM, GerMAnium, dammit! |
| |
14th October 2012
|
#16 | | Lives for gear
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,365
| Quote:
Originally Posted by 2N1305 Does rock wool seem to give anyone a hard time breathing-wise, and skin-wise, does it irritate you? | I worked with rock wool on exactly one occasion without adequate protection.
|
| |
15th October 2012
|
#17 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Nov 2004 Location: Stavenisse
Posts: 1,838
|
I've worked with Rockwool countless times without protection... No problems. But some people are very sensitive to the little fibers wich can stick in the skin..
|
| |
15th October 2012
|
#18 | | Gear nut
Joined: Oct 2005 Location: IN
Posts: 107
| Quote:
Originally Posted by muziekschuur I've worked with Rockwool countless times without protection... No problems. But some people are very sensitive to the little fibers wich can stick in the skin.. | Same here. Rockwool is tons less itchy to work with than fluffy, unless you're working with it overhead. Then its more crumbly nature seems to make it as bad as or worse than fluffy.
|
| | | |