Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Studio construction & acoustics > Photo diaries of recording studio construction projects

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What should a skyline diffusor be made of? Jax Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc 40 4th August 2008 01:47 PM
anybody made home-made absorbers with 703? spoonie g So much gear, so little time! 6 4th December 2007 02:02 AM
my LP made at home jacker Work in progress / advice requested / Show & Tell / Artist showcase 0 18th October 2007 08:34 PM
Home-made booth montanasan So much gear, so little time! 13 11th January 2007 11:35 PM
home made gear TOR So much gear, so little time! 2 15th October 2003 01:00 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 18th May 2008, 10:57 PM   #31
datune
Gear nut
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vienna
Posts: 84
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeep View Post
well i depends on where you're putting it, and what result you wish to achieve
so for example in a control room, you want absorption in the front to get rid of the first reflections from your monitors, and diffusion on th back wall, to breathe some life back into the room. this creates a "reflection free zone" when seated at the correct position within the room

every room is different, and different rooms within studios serve a different purpose, which calls for different acoustic treatment
its not as straight forward as most of us think or would like it to be


do you plan on treating one of your rooms? or are you just interested in acoustics?

thankksssss
Hey jeep ;-)

I'm generally interested in learning more about acoustics. I have created a RFZ zone in my room, but at the back there's currently two broadband absorbers. I'm not sure if I would like the sound of a diffusor (hard to know since I can not test it), but if you have watched the video from Ethan about diffusors, personally I thought the most natural sounding one was the last one, with the guitar sitting in the room, and the absorption panels a good distance away.

From all I could gather so far, I'd be inclined to think that generally absorption for smaller rooms MAY be better then diffusion, but obviously this is just from what I've read.

That's the piece of the puzzle that's still missing for me, trying to figure out when it's best to use diffusion vs absorption.

I do know one thing though, no single piece of equipment on this planet will improve sound quality so dramatically as acoustical treatment, at least that's my experience, but for sure you know all that , otherwise you wouldn't get your hands sore

Looking forward to seeing this finished and reading your results as to whether the outcome is as expected.
__________________
"Never argue with an idiot. They will bring you down to their level and beat you with experience."
datune is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th May 2008, 10:59 AM   #32
jeep
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Central Coast, NSW, AUSTRALIA!
Posts: 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by datune View Post
Hey jeep ;-)

I'm generally interested in learning more about acoustics.
Howdy partner

If you've got a keen interest for acoustics, I would highly recommend getting "The Master Handbook of Acoustics: Fourth Edition" by F. Alton Everest
It's very, very helpful and informaive

Quote:
I have created a RFZ zone in my room, but at the back there's currently two broadband absorbers. I'm not sure if I would like the sound of a diffusor (hard to know since I can not test it), but if you have watched the video from Ethan about diffusors, personally I thought the most natural sounding one was the last one, with the guitar sitting in the room, and the absorption panels a good distance away.
Like gear, methods etc. the sound of your control room should be the way you want it to be. Some people like completely dead control rooms, others totally live. The reason for absorption at the front and diffusion at the back is to give you a balanced, natural room to work in. If you were to mix in a dead room, you may add too much reverb or effects. if you were to mix in a live room you may end up creating a very boring or dull mix. The aim is find a balance between the two, which should enable you to create a mix that translates well when played back in the real world.

Quote:
From all I could gather so far, I'd be inclined to think that generally absorption for smaller rooms MAY be better then diffusion, but obviously this is just from what I've read.
From what I have read also, this is true. But without having years of experience and research, unfortunately I can't answer this
A lot of bass trapping seems to be the most common treatment for small rooms..
Another thing is that diffusion generally requires a fair amount of space to work, but this really depends on the design
In my case, my back wall is only just over 1 metre behind me. The diffusor that Jason designed for me should work under this condition

What are the dimensions of your room?
Are there any windows?
Where are your speakers placed?

Quote:
That's the piece of the puzzle that's still missing for me, trying to figure out when it's best to use diffusion vs absorption.
Try using absorption everywhere until the sound is more focused and becomes clearer. Then, if it sounds too dead, add some diffusion on your back wall, back sides and maybe even back ceiling.

Quote:
I do know one thing though, no single piece of equipment on this planet will improve sound quality so dramatically as acoustical treatment, at least that's my experience, but for sure you know all that , otherwise you wouldn't get your hands sore

Looking forward to seeing this finished and reading your results as to whether the outcome is as expected.
Thanks for your interest
I hope this helps and doesn't steer you in the wrong direction.. I'm sure one of the other guys will correct me if I've said anything wrong anyway


The process of placing all the blocks in the right location one by one..
(in reverse)













Queens Of The Stone Age - Lullabies to Paralyze
the perfect album for doing anything


I'm currently gluing the balsa blocks to the base.
jeep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th May 2008, 09:47 PM   #33
datune
Gear nut
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vienna
Posts: 84
Hey jeep ;-)

Below is a drawing of my room and the current treatment (I realize there is lots of room for more treatment)

But hey, I don't mean to pollute your thread ;-)

I'm really curious how it's going to affect the sound in your room once finished.


__________________
"Never argue with an idiot. They will bring you down to their level and beat you with experience."
datune is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th May 2008, 05:23 AM   #34
skatingbasser
Gear nut
 
skatingbasser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 122
Hey Jeep,

Could you write me a quick summary of what all was involved? I don't doubt for a second the amount of work you did, I'm just trying to understand where all the time went.

I thought you were numbering the blocks based on depth, plotting the squares on the base in numerical order, and using those charts to organize which blocks go where... but the squares on the base aren't in numerical order, and the numbering system for the blocks don't appear to match with depths.


Sooo....


Whatcha doin' there, man?
skatingbasser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th May 2008, 10:37 AM   #35
jeep
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Central Coast, NSW, AUSTRALIA!
Posts: 208
just waiting for the liquid nails to dry
almost time to go on the wall!










oh and the colour scheme,
don't ask.
jeep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th May 2008, 11:02 AM   #36
datune
Gear nut
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vienna
Posts: 84
So how does it sound?
__________________
"Never argue with an idiot. They will bring you down to their level and beat you with experience."
datune is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th May 2008, 11:41 AM   #37
jeep
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Central Coast, NSW, AUSTRALIA!
Posts: 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by datune View Post
So how does it sound?
after a quick listen i honestly couldn't hear much difference

about 2 hours later i sat down and gave it some more though/listening and began to notice a clearer, more natural sound
i could best describe as this:
imagine you're at the beach, swimming in a dense liquid, like mud. full of gunk and seaweed. you then come to a section where the water is clean and clear - it is much easier to swim in, and the ocean feels bigger. you are free

does my analogy make sense?
haha
jeep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th May 2008, 02:20 PM   #38
rarseman
Gear maniac
 
rarseman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 260



Quote:
Originally Posted by jeep View Post
just waiting for the liquid nails to dry
almost time to go on the wall!










oh and the colour scheme,
don't ask.
__________________

Yul
rarseman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th May 2008, 02:35 PM   #39
jeep
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Central Coast, NSW, AUSTRALIA!
Posts: 208


fin.
jeep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd May 2008, 09:07 PM   #40
audiovisceral
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 839
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeep View Post

fin.

paint is great. very modern art!

ps. qrd's are waaay easier
audiovisceral is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd May 2008, 09:14 PM   #41
bitman
Lives for gear
 
bitman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Keystone, CO
Posts: 649
And the sound now?
bitman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2008, 08:00 PM   #42
Jabbaz
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4
I made a 460mmx460mm one of these out of cedar, and my longest pieces were 350mm. Needless to say it was a heavy sucker... and a challenge to hang.

Jeep:

Did you have to plane the balsa, or was it all straight and consistent in dimensions? My issue was that the first pieces I inserted lined up pretty well but the dimensional differences accumulated, and by the end the alignment got ugly.

I found the cutting and organizing didn't take too long... the most time consuming part was gluing.

Also, I read somewhere that having a frame round the exterior reduces the diffuser's low frequency performance. Can anyone confirm?
Jabbaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th May 2008, 04:48 PM   #43
T.H.Reid
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Hobart Tazzie
Posts: 13
F**KING exellent, mate!!!
T.H.Reid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th May 2008, 12:13 AM   #44
Ben Brayer
Gear interested
 
Ben Brayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lowell, MA
Posts: 19
Send a message via AIM to Ben Brayer
That looks awesome!
__________________
Ben Brayer
Ben Brayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st June 2008, 01:04 AM   #45
Lissajous
Gear nut
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 109
Awesome
Lissajous is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th June 2008, 02:11 AM   #46
jeep
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Central Coast, NSW, AUSTRALIA!
Posts: 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by datune View Post
Hey jeep ;-)

Below is a drawing of my room and the current treatment (I realize there is lots of room for more treatment)

But hey, I don't mean to pollute your thread ;-)

I'm really curious how it's going to affect the sound in your room once finished.


If i were you i'd move everything back a little bit, so your sitting position is almost in the middle.
it seems that you've taken into account balance of sound - equal distances of monitors etc which is good
maybe place your sub in the middle of your 2 monitors (on the floor of course). i can't imagine the current location being good for it.. corners = build up of bass frequencies
your 1st reflection points seem to be covered. wonderful

my recommendation is to put some diffusion on the back wall and the rear back walls.
i had some clients over on the weekend and they made the comment that the room sounded partially dead, but not too dead. a good, even and comfortable balance between live and dead sound was present
you'll never understand until you give it a try

Quote:
Originally Posted by bitman View Post
And the sound now?
magical

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jabbaz View Post
I made a 460mmx460mm one of these out of cedar, and my longest pieces were 350mm. Needless to say it was a heavy sucker... and a challenge to hang.

Jeep:

Did you have to plane the balsa, or was it all straight and consistent in dimensions? My issue was that the first pieces I inserted lined up pretty well but the dimensional differences accumulated, and by the end the alignment got ugly.

I found the cutting and organizing didn't take too long... the most time consuming part was gluing.

Also, I read somewhere that having a frame round the exterior reduces the diffuser's low frequency performance. Can anyone confirm?


not too sure on the frame regarding low diffusion loss
i hope not!!

yeh gluing took a long time
i took A LOT of time making everything was as accurate as possible
and even after that i had some problems at the end
i had to cut/sand some of the outer row blocks (only by about 2mms though)

the next one i make will probably be on foam board or something so it'd be lighter than a picture frame!!


cheers everyone
jeep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th June 2008, 02:18 AM   #47
jeep
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Central Coast, NSW, AUSTRALIA!
Posts: 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by skatingbasser View Post
Hey Jeep,

Could you write me a quick summary of what all was involved? I don't doubt for a second the amount of work you did, I'm just trying to understand where all the time went.

I thought you were numbering the blocks based on depth, plotting the squares on the base in numerical order, and using those charts to organize which blocks go where... but the squares on the base aren't in numerical order, and the numbering system for the blocks don't appear to match with depths.


Sooo....


Whatcha doin' there, man?
made the frame
measured the 323 blocks to length
cut them and numbered them once cut - there were approx. 30 different lengths, each block having its own individual number or position.
sanded each block
lined up and glued each block
spray painted

took about a week (part time)
jeep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th July 2008, 10:18 PM   #48
winvbass
Gear Head
 
winvbass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Brighton UK
Posts: 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeep View Post
Queens Of The Stone Age - Lullabies to Paralyze
the perfect album for doing anything


I'm currently gluing the balsa blocks to the base.

Weird... Stumbled across this thread whilst listening to that very album. Cosmic!
winvbass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st July 2008, 04:48 AM   #49
andrebrito
Gear addict
 
andrebrito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London
Posts: 344
Great work !! Looks great.
__________________
Studio Design, Home Cinema/Studios Assistance, Large Room Acoustics projects - UK and Portugal. Online Consulting for the rest of the world

We also sell acoustical diffusers at affordable prices, starting at 70 € / piece each !

http://www.onlineacoustics.com

Music - http://www.myspace.com/spinous
andrebrito is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th August 2008, 03:49 PM   #50
boskop
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5
jeep, why have you set up your matrix with 17x19 blocks? this doesn't make sense to me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5401921.html
Applicants have found that to form a two-dimensional primitive root array, the prime number N must be chosen so that N-1 has two coprime factors which are non-divisible into each other.
obviously your calculations are based on N = 324 (=17*19+1), which however is not a prime number.

so your block depths are actually wrong..?
boskop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th August 2008, 04:26 PM   #51
dykstraster@gmai
Lives for gear
 
dykstraster@gmai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Midwest
Posts: 899
Quote:
Originally Posted by boskop View Post
jeep, why have you set up your matrix with 17x19 blocks? this doesn't make sense to me.



obviously your calculations are based on N = 324 (=17*19+1), which however is not a prime number.

so your block depths are actually wrong..?
obviously
__________________
"phantom power doesn't make your voice sound spooky"

ME
http://www.myspace.com/dykstra

MY BAND
http://www.myspace.com/revisiontext

OUR STUDIO
http://www.gearslutz.com/board/bass-...-progress.html
dykstraster@gmai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th August 2008, 04:44 PM   #52
boskop
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5
what?
boskop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th August 2008, 03:56 AM   #53
dykstraster@gmai
Lives for gear
 
dykstraster@gmai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Midwest
Posts: 899
Sorry, I didn't mean any disrespect. It's just when you put "obviously" in front of a difficult (to me anyways) equation, I think it's a bit funny.
__________________
"phantom power doesn't make your voice sound spooky"

ME
http://www.myspace.com/dykstra

MY BAND
http://www.myspace.com/revisiontext

OUR STUDIO
http://www.gearslutz.com/board/bass-...-progress.html
dykstraster@gmai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th August 2008, 07:32 PM   #54
DeadPoet
Lives for gear
 
DeadPoet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 676
I'm looking at doing 13 diffusers next month or so. 144 blocks per, 82x82cm per..

Wish me luck.



Herwig
DeadPoet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th August 2008, 08:31 PM   #55
boskop
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5
Quote:
Originally Posted by dykstraster@gmai View Post
Sorry, I didn't mean any disrespect. It's just when you put "obviously" in front of a difficult (to me anyways) equation, I think it's a bit funny.
ok.. well as far as i understand this paper: Two-dimensional primitive root diffusor - Patent 5401921

the number of blocks equals a chosen prime number N minus 1. The heights of the blocks are estimated as described on 7.

so N=323 blocks means jeep started with N+1 as the chosen prime number. but 324 is not prime..
boskop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th August 2008, 08:33 PM   #56
boskop
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5
.. as described on page 7 i meant
boskop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th August 2008, 08:41 PM   #57
boskop
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5
dont get me wrong, i dont mean to be picky, but ... if the block heights are not correct, this piece looses a significant part of its effectiveness. there is quite some math behind this ;)
boskop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th August 2008, 03:09 PM   #58
mattyRPG
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 5
cn i ask..how long did it take you to make those, and roughly how much do you think it cost?
mattyRPG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th August 2008, 03:25 PM   #59
diogo_c
Gear maniac
 
diogo_c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Brazil
Posts: 286
Send a message via MSN to diogo_c
congratulations, it looks great - and i hope it sounds great as well!

looking forward to build two of these babies for me soon!