Login / Register
 
Acoustic guitar recording issue
New Reply
Subscribe
AminNapil
Thread Starter
#1
9th November 2011
Old 9th November 2011
  #1
Gear Head
 
AminNapil's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2009
Location: Cairo,Egypt
Posts: 73

Thread Starter
AminNapil is offline
Acoustic guitar recording issue

Hello guys,
I really Love this forum
I have a m-audio fast track sound card and I want to record a finger style track should i connect the sound card to the guitar or using a mic will give me better quality?
Thx,
Amin
#2
9th November 2011
Old 9th November 2011
  #2
Moderator
 
matt thomas's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Location: New Zealand/Switzerland/guitar case
Posts: 9,848

matt thomas is offline
They will sound different, but the only one who can decide which is better is you.

That said, most people think a mic sounds better, because it can sound more like a real guitar.

Plugging the guitar in directly may sound slightly more percussive, which may suit or not.

matt
#3
9th November 2011
Old 9th November 2011
  #3
Gear nut
 
nooneimportant's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Location: New York
Posts: 124

nooneimportant is offline
You'll get a lot more sound of the guitarist moving their hands and their fingers/pick hitting the strings if you mic it, plugging it in tends to get a more defined sound- but try em both and see what you like.
#4
10th November 2011
Old 10th November 2011
  #4
Gear nut
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 138

pattherocker is offline
For acoustic guitar i alway mic it. If you go this rout be sure to experiment with mic placement as it can drastically change the tone of your recording. i get good results up around the 12th fret at 45* angle above and approx 1.5' away.
#5
10th November 2011
Old 10th November 2011
  #5
Gear maniac
 
boybianchi's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Location: The Hague
Posts: 175

boybianchi is offline
in your title you state that this is an issue.
It's really not, actually.
It's a matter of taste, so you should try both and hear how you feel like it.

That said, consider the fact that if you DI it, you'll have more control over the post-production, since it's cleaner than mic recording. If you for example put a delay or reverb on a mic session, you will also delay and reverberate the back ground noise. This is far less of a problem if you use DI.
#6
11th November 2011
Old 11th November 2011
  #6
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,268

Manfrensengensen is offline
DI and mic it. Choose later or blend both.
AminNapil
Thread Starter
#7
29th December 2011
Old 29th December 2011
  #7
Gear Head
 
AminNapil's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2009
Location: Cairo,Egypt
Posts: 73

Thread Starter
AminNapil is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by boybianchi View Post
in your title you state that this is an issue.
It's really not, actually.
It's a matter of taste, so you should try both and hear how you feel like it.

That said, consider the fact that if you DI it, you'll have more control over the post-production, since it's cleaner than mic recording. If you for example put a delay or reverb on a mic session, you will also delay and reverberate the back ground noise. This is far less of a problem if you use DI.
Thanks alot
AminNapil
Thread Starter
#8
5th February 2012
Old 5th February 2012
  #8
Gear Head
 
AminNapil's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2009
Location: Cairo,Egypt
Posts: 73

Thread Starter
AminNapil is offline
Thanks alot
New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn  Submit Thread to Google+ Google+ 
 
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Forum Jump

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.