Placing Mic Pres AFTER the Mixer in chain - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Newbie audio engineering & production question zone (trial beta forum)

Placing Mic Pres AFTER the Mixer in chain
Topic: New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 13th February 2013   #1
Gear interested
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2

Thread Starter
Placing Mic Pres AFTER the Mixer in chain

I'm relatively new to recording. My band usually goes into a professional studio to have our tracking/mixes done, but this time around we all decided to buy our own gear in order to track more frequently.

We've acquired some decent gear, but I wanted to know what peoples thought was about placing the mic pres after the mixer, and also my mic setup/routing in general.

Here's my chain:

(Drums) 2 RCA Varacoustic mics [OH] + SM57 [Snare] + Beta 52A [Kick] + (Guitar) SM57 + (Bass) SM57 > Randall Stereo Mixer RM-12-2 vintage > (L/R out mix) 2 Vintech 573 > Tascam 246

After that I was going to mixdown by sending it to our Fireface 800 using Logic.

We want it to come out a lil rough on the edges. Ty Segall for example. Perhaps some will come back as to why I'd like it to sound that way, but it's a matter of taste for me.

Any help/opinions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! -Jon

Last edited by thetuningroom; 13th February 2013 at 08:56 AM.. Reason: Better Title
thetuningroom is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2013   #2
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Area 51, NV, USA
Posts: 1,592

Quote:
Originally Posted by thetuningroom View Post
...We've acquired some decent gear, but I wanted to know what peoples thought was about placing the mic pres after the mixer,...
Normally, this would be considered a big "no-no" because most mic pres would simply be overdriven and sound really crappy if you did that unless you inserted an attenuator between the mixer output and the mic pre. However, the Vintech VA 573 has a line input that's apparently routed through the input transformer, so there is no technical reason not to use it that way. It can handle the line level output from the mixer and add it's "character" depending on how hard you drive it.

The Tascam 246 will obviously have the largest effect on the total sound. If you really like that retro '80's cassette sound, fine, but you might want to consider going directly into the Fireface.

The only concern would be running the whole mix through [the VA 573] and adding that sound "character" to the whole band (could be boring). It might be more appropriate on the guitar and bass only, but it's strictly a matter of personal taste and artistic judgement. Since your Randall is an old "PA" mixer, I don't know if it has any AUX sends and returns (don't think so), so it might not be possible to patch the VA 573 in that way. If it sounds good to you and the band agrees that it's the sound you like, then do it.
Lotus 7 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2013   #3
Lives for gear
 
skillz335's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Location: Ohio

Thanks for the knowledge bomb guys, I have some things to look up.
skillz335 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 14th February 2013   #4
Gear interested
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2

Thread Starter
Thanks Lotus, Yeah the mixer doesn't have an aux in/out...but I see what you're saying about the mic pre. I was kinda thinking it might work if I turn up the mic pre and start at 0 on all levels on the mixer and slowly turn them up to mix.

But as far as the Tascam 246, I really want to at least try it out to see how it sounds with our music. I've heard fantastic recordings on the 388 and the 246 isn't that far off. I'll probably try both.
thetuningroom is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 14th February 2013   #5
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Area 51, NV, USA
Posts: 1,592

Quote:
Originally Posted by thetuningroom View Post
I was kinda thinking it might work if I turn up the mic pre and start at 0 on all levels on the mixer and slowly turn them up to mix....
Running it that way might work gain staging wise, but even at low signal output on your mixer you will still have the mixer's "noise floor" to deal with which isn't going to be low on that mixer.

The VA 573 line-input probably uses a built-in pad that runs everything through the whole pre so should still give the pre "sound". Running it directly to the mic input will give more input transformer saturation, but risks driving the input stages into hard clipping which is more "crash" (like a 10-car pile-up) than crunch and usually doesn't sound good to most people.

If you do try it that way, you may want to be careful setting your monitor levels. Playing music which contains hard clipping at high levels can be pretty hard on your tweeters, not to mention your ears!

Re: The 246: I guess it's an "acquired taste", maybe like anchovies, or warm beer.
Whatever works for YOU!
Lotus 7 is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Jason Mraz "I'm Yours" Vocal Chain? tallboy79 So much gear, so little time! 10 6th April 2012 01:48 PM
daisy chaining a Motu 8Pre sanjaydas7 Low End Theory 6 5th May 2008 09:23 PM
Incubus Vocal Chain? Koed So much gear, so little time! 1 31st January 2007 11:28 PM
mic preamp position in signal chain maim9 Low End Theory 6 22nd January 2007 08:56 AM
Used EQ's...for Mastering. Need opinions... MASSIVE Master Mastering forum 27 29th November 2006 03:56 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:18 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.