24 to 16 bit conversion to DAT - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Newbie audio engineering & production question zone (trial beta forum)

24 to 16 bit conversion to DAT
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 5th June 2012   #1
Gear interested
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 16

Thread Starter
24 to 16 bit conversion to DAT

I am currently using a Lucid AD9624 to a Tascam DA-P1 portable DAT recorder (as well as other outputs like the SONY PCM-D50). The Lucid can convert to either 24 or 16 bit. I know the PCM-D50 can handle 48kHz/24 bit easily directly from the Lucid, but what happens when recording to the DA-P1 like that? Does the dithering to 16 bit happen automatically in the DA-P1 or is it better to dither to 16bit directly in the Lucent before going to the DAT machine? I’ve done some tests here in my living room, but of course, the room noise is probably a lot noisier than anything transmitted digitally and are pretty useless.
PJWeitzner is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 5th June 2012   #2
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 520

I'm wondering what would happen if you use the SPDIF connections? Does the Tascam reject the word clock?
It is not clear that the Tascam uses any kind of input dithering at all.
You are never going to really "hear" a difference between 16 and 24 bit recordings.
I have many old masters on DAT tape and to me they sound better than a lot of stuff I've done in the box at 24 bit. I had Sony DATS. I should have keep them.
I remember I dumped them all into my computer via a SPDIF input on a Sound Blaster Audigy card directly to Wave Lab.
Unless this is something super important I would not worry about it.
johnnyv is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th June 2012   #3
Lives for gear
 
Adam Dempsey's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: Melbourne - Australia's music capital.
Posts: 1,908
My Recordings/Credits

I'd set the Lucid to output 16 bit dithered, then run the signal via SPDIF to the DAT.

DAT recorders that applied dither on input (eg, the later Sony PCM R series with Super Bit Mapping) did so on the A-D side, not via digital input.

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyv
You are never going to really "hear" a difference between 16 and 24 bit recordings.
While the difference may not be audible as-is, the distortion from truncating without dither can easily accumulate, and at levels higher than dither (and of course being uncorrelated with the signal). Nothing to lose from dithering, and it does preserve low level detail in the 24 bit source.
__________________
Adam
Jack the Bear's Deluxe Mastering
facebook | twitter
Is adding presence the same as subtracting absence?
Adam Dempsey is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th June 2012   #4
Gear interested
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 16

Thread Starter
Thanks, JohnnyV and Adam. I am connecting through coaxial SPDIF directly to the DAT machine. I think I will abide by the 48/16 so the dithering is done in the AD converter.
PJWeitzner is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Adding a mic pre / A-D converter to MPC1000? SecretAgent Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 23 14th December 2007 12:40 AM
Sample Rate Conversion In Real Time, mastering quality Andy Krehm Mastering forum 0 16th January 2007 07:44 PM
SMPTE to MTC conversion checkers1811 Music Computers 1 12th January 2007 07:10 PM
dat 48 to cd 44 transfer issue kellyr52 High end 8 2nd January 2007 08:32 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:14 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.