![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Waves Tune | Sammy | Music computers | 11 | 20th July 2006 06:22 PM |
| Waves Tune what's up? | doogie | Music computers | 6 | 14th April 2006 04:25 AM |
| Any new reports on Waves TUNE? | celebritymusic | So much gear, so little time! | 2 | 2nd March 2006 05:52 PM |
| Waves Tune | Unbound | So much gear, so little time! | 7 | 4th December 2005 02:47 AM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: NYC
Posts: 695
| Waves Tune and Breath Holy poop batman at AES new autotune plugin in from Waves and Breath removal plug in - both outstanding. In 2 weeks - make sure you are in WUP. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Paris
Posts: 54
| Tell us more ! Nothing on waves page yet.. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 634
| A little hint of how it works here. It is suppose to be way more efficient than Auto-tune. Appearantly it has streamline features that everyone wanted in Auto-tune. If you wait too long then someone else will make it better. Shane
__________________ "Music should be performed by the musician not by the engineer." Michael Wagener 25th July 2005, 02:59 PM _____________________________________________ |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Ireland
Posts: 328
| Breath removal, wow that's a big step forward..... I knew I could make truly great records if only I could get rid of those breaths. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: NYC
Posts: 695
| Breath removal is a very important and big development for many audio engineers who have spent the time removing breaths by hand on long VO or Rap VOX files. Gates work but this tool looks like the holy grail. For my Post work it will save hours. The auto tune plugin looks like the best of melodyne and autotune in one. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,514
| RE: breath removal finally a plug-in that suffocates your audio INTENTIONALLY |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Germany / Frankfurt
Posts: 969
| Quote:
![]() | |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Canuk
Posts: 3,413
| I am wondering why all this information is well hidden on the Waves web site. I must be blind as there seems no mention of it there. Price ? Demos? is it free with WUP? |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Interzone
Posts: 292
| "The final vocal line can be exported as a MIDI file so the user can have other instruments tracking it exactly, or create perfect harmonies and counter-melodies." Thats a hot feature, imagine the possibilities.
__________________ Too many pieces of music finish too long after the end. - Igor Stravinsky. |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Gear addict | The Tuner plugin is amazing, i went back to see it 2x. Ive always used Autotune and know just about everything it can and cant do, and when this finally comes out.........i wont miss Autotune. The audio shifting is formant correction so it sounds much better than autotune when its pitching. And you can completely change the melody of what someone sang and it sounds like they sang it that way. It is basically a standalone program that routes into PT thru rewire. The reason that they did that is because Digi only allows plugin developers to access so much DSP power with plugins and Waves needed way more DSP to do the job right and give you lots of control and the ability to see detailed waveforms (very zoomable) with all the tuning information overlayed on it. There is no need to use automation with this plug in, you just save your setting kinda like automation. Its extremely powerful, but they made it very simple to use and understand very fast. As always, Waves is at the top of their game. They deserve to charge what they do, they just have great stuff. And i heard they have other bombs to drop in the near future too that will make us all scramble for our credit cards. |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 524
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2002 Location: Ans (Liege) Belgium
Posts: 3,214
| Quote:
Sounds like a Melodynisch way of tuning. I'll be very curious to try it out. Melodyne's audio quality after processing / or even without processing and simply passing the audio through melodyne is to put it simple : UNACCEPTABLE. I hope waves did a better job. Arguably one can say of course that if one needs to tune, the loss in 'sound' comes with that. But autotune so far has proven the most effective in that fiels.
__________________ Chris Lambrechts MiLaR Event ITB or OTB ... Who cares .... it's all about MIXING. ![]() | |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: NYC
Posts: 695
| My understandind - disclaimer I don't work for Waves and it was loud on the AES floor. Gold and above if you are in WUP you get Tune lite (no midi functionality import/export) - upgrade to full is ~$300 (this is from memory folks and I could be completely wrong) Breath free under WUP if Gold + |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 901
| news just in... I have just developed a plug in that removes the music from your music! Guaranteed to work 100%, 100% of the time. PM me for details. |
| | |
| | #16 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Elmont NY
Posts: 3,220
| Quote:
__________________ Lou Gimenez www.musiclabnyc.com | |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 634
|
__________________ "Music should be performed by the musician not by the engineer." Michael Wagener 25th July 2005, 02:59 PM _____________________________________________ |
| | |
| | #18 | |
| Gear Head | Quote:
Too bad they then resort to their ill-conceived WUP-ASS to extract additional money from its users. As "justified" by the otherwise fine folks at Waves, this particular CMS* may look or sound good... until you abandon the "Waves-made KoolAid Diet Plan" and start applying a bit of noggin' power to it all. All of it is particularly bad if one is a TDM user. Take a look at what Waves "promises" (they're actually more clever than that - they only hint, never promise) and what they have delivered since WUP-ASS was implemented. The sad but hard-to-refute facts show that WUP-ASS monies have financed the company's development of new hardware (!), porting existing software to platforms other than TDM (360 bundle to VST), and financed the development of entirely new products. None of the above is bad, per se, except that it is achieved thanks to financing obtained under false pretences. I wouldn't mind nearly as much if Waves were to address long-standing bugs, if it were to implement new functionality brought forth by PT 6.0 (!) and subsequent releases, or if it were to follow some very reasonable customer requests (such as releasing mono versions of their L2). Instead... nada! As implemented by Waves over the course of the last few years, the WUP-ASS program is unfair, underhanded and deceitful. As much as I love the company's products, I am compelled to speak out about this most egregious example of greed. * Customer Milking Scheme
__________________ Andre Knecht “We’ll fix it in the shrink-wrap” (Frank Zappa) | |
| | |
| | #19 | |
| Gear nut Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Boston
Posts: 120
| Quote:
-j ![]() | |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Gear Head | The depth of your insight is truly awe-inspiring. I hope you're in charge of big things, SuperBuddy™.
__________________ Andre Knecht “We’ll fix it in the shrink-wrap” (Frank Zappa) |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 634
|
__________________ "Music should be performed by the musician not by the engineer." Michael Wagener 25th July 2005, 02:59 PM _____________________________________________ |
| | |
| | #22 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Canuk
Posts: 3,413
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #23 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 634
| Quote:
The funny thing is that I just finished a session with a guy who wanted me to spend hours tuning and fixing his vocals. I told him no and that he doesnt need it. We spent a few extra hours getting it down the way it should be. Just saved myself days of edits. And I was even thinking about quoting my signature to him also. But the big irony of it all, is that I get hired to tune vocal tracks quite often. I cant begin to tell you how much I HATE that part of my job. And the more I charge to stop people from hiring me to do this, the more people seem to hire me. Go figure. Pays the bills though. Shane
__________________ "Music should be performed by the musician not by the engineer." Michael Wagener 25th July 2005, 02:59 PM _____________________________________________ | |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 634
| I also got a good laugh at how Waves promotes this on their "Intro" video. They seem to make 'pitch correction' as something that is 'always done' and 'suppose' to happen in sessions. Shane
__________________ "Music should be performed by the musician not by the engineer." Michael Wagener 25th July 2005, 02:59 PM _____________________________________________ |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Hollywood
Posts: 1,372
| I just made the plunge and bought it. Hope it's good. |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,514
| I liked this software the first time... when it was called Melodyne... This software makes me wonder why Celemony didn't patent the Melodyne approach. Or if they did, why they're not suing. It's quite obvious to me that Waves (and MOTU) have appropriated the Celemony "look & feel." The Melodyne approach is so smart and intuitive, you're surprised nobody thought of it before. It makes a lot more sense musically than the Antares Autotune model. (My opinion, of course.) So why isn't Celemony getting upset about people encroaching upon their terrain? Or did the "look & feel" lawsuit go out of fashion at the end of the '90s?... - c |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: london
Posts: 1,699
| Im checking the tune lite and its amazing I don't think waves are doing the breath as a free upgrade even to Platinum users with WUP .... |
| | |
| | #28 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Athens, GA- US
Posts: 2,224
| I'm with Tetness...I took the dive as well. Hope it is cool....I hate Autotune, so I maybe I will only paritally hate this! ![]()
__________________ Me- "You know he's not playing in key right?" Unnamed Producer A- "Really?....Uh, Does that matter?" Me- sigh...."In all other cases, Yes, in this one...I guess not so much." http://pigpenstudios.net http://www.myspace.com/pigpenstudios |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: NJ
Posts: 41
| may I ask where you purchased tune from? I usually deal with sweetwater, but they've only got the "vocal BUNDLE"; that double tracker and de-breath stuff are of no use to me. Thanks! -Ryan |
| | |
| | #30 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: london
Posts: 1,699
| You can get it of waves.com .... I got the tune lite (free upgrade for platinum owners) But Im pissed off that thats all they give and I only got AU ....has anyone got the TDM tune? |
| | |