![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| nu47 microphone: is this just pure hype? if not prove it | JOHN | High end | 2 | 18th February 2007 01:36 PM |
| have you heard about these converters : DFM ? | isham | Low End Theory | 0 | 11th February 2006 08:00 PM |
| Has anyone heard these converters | jhg | New product alert! | 16 | 2nd September 2005 08:55 AM |
| Ever used or heard these converters | DivineMusic | So much gear, so little time! | 4 | 31st August 2005 04:43 AM |
| anyone heard KRONAUER converters? | lowswing | So much gear, so little time! | 1 | 2nd August 2004 09:33 AM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #121 | |
| Gear nut Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 111
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #122 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: m a n h a t t a n
Posts: 5,256
| the burl session at musegarden so THAT's what a melodica looks like...
__________________ . . . m i x _ a r c h i t e c t . . __________________ |
| | |
| | #123 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: m a n h a t t a n
Posts: 5,256
| the burl session at musegarden we don't need no steenkeeng front heads mang... note the unorthodox positioning of the kit mics.
__________________ . . . m i x _ a r c h i t e c t . . __________________ |
| | |
| | #124 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: m a n h a t t a n
Posts: 5,256
| the burl session at musegarden here are the beasts in question, in a stunning display of professional setuppery. note precarious balance, loose wires, custom plastic slipmat, and general mayhemishness.
__________________ . . . m i x _ a r c h i t e c t . . __________________ |
| | |
| | #125 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: m a n h a t t a n
Posts: 5,256
| the burl session at musegarden a prophet must walk many rhodes to hear the great voice in the sky...
__________________ . . . m i x _ a r c h i t e c t . . __________________ |
| | |
| | #126 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: mexico
Posts: 3,493
| |
| | |
| | #127 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: m a n h a t t a n
Posts: 5,256
| the burl session at musegarden the 70's didn't happen by accident, y'know.
__________________ . . . m i x _ a r c h i t e c t . . __________________ |
| | |
| | #128 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: mexico
Posts: 3,493
| |
| | |
| | #129 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 119
| UBK, I'm thinking one day you'll just quietly get up out of your chair and walk into the music ........ Dimension (depth/perspective) is like loving the woman you can't have - once you taste it you are doomed! Cheers, Ross |
| | |
| | #130 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 384
| Philadelphian's know that thing as a "Hooter" (at least before the Restaurant chain overtook the name). Great recording, by the way.
__________________ B www.minerstreet.com www.myspace.com/minerstreetrecordings www.myspace.com/bitterbitterweeks |
| | |
| | #131 | |
| Gear nut Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Beijing
Posts: 105
| Quote:
I really like the song and the care free vibe and the tracks definitely do sound amazing. I tried get a Wax Poetic (Tommy) style sound, with lots of lovely bass but also a really crisp snare sound. I did fail, but I still think it sounds OK. Any feedback would be nice as I am not experienced at mixing. http://www.fileden.com/files/2007/11...0JSV%20ITB.mp3 Great thread and many thanks Greg for putting this out here. | |
| | |
| | #132 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: London, UK
Posts: 961
| Thanks for the info and especially the files UBK. The Burl had a tighter defined low end and the 4-10K range sounds really smooth to my cloth ears. I've always like the 2192 but would love to hear some more comparisons? |
| | |
| | #133 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: m a n h a t t a n
Posts: 5,256
| NICE! alright, i've decided to list my most favorite and least favorite things about each mix. the cool thing is that every mix gave me cues to how i would approach something differently because the treatment strikes me as particularly creative, or effective, or both. every mix was in some way inspiring. js vega, what i liked most by far was the keyboard treatment. you took an otherwise static element and imbued it with life and motion, and it seemed to live just under the surface of the music like an alligator biding its time. very cool. what i liked least was the degree of compression, which seemed to rob the sounds of their life and dimension. in particular, the kick gets lost on the one of most measures, presumably because the bass is swallowing it. norman, i loved your treatment of the backing/filler vocals, the uhh-uhh's. this was a part that i shied away from in my mix because they felt uninspired, but your stereoization and bold placement really gave them a spark they didn't have in any other mix. lovely! what i liked least was the synthetic, processed tone of the drums, and how everything in the song seemed to lose its tonal glue. things sound like they were separated with eq then forced together with compression, when to my ears they simply fall together better when the natural tone did all the work. bcgood, well, on first blush i thought your mix sounded extremely similar to mine. but a moment into it i realized that you actually nailed it in a way i didn't. you made sure every single moment was dialed, every placement came and went in exactly the way it wanted. my hat is off to you, i bow to your superior kung fu. if i had to come up with something i like least, it'd be the fact that i like your mix better than mine. well done everyone! gregoire del ubk .
__________________ . . . m i x _ a r c h i t e c t . . __________________ |
| | |
| | #134 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Texas
Posts: 1,835
| 01000001 01101000 01101000 01101000 01101000 00101100 00100000 01001110 01101111 00100000 01101101 01101111 01110010 01100101 00100000 01100010 01101001 01101110 01100001 01110010 01111001 00100000 01110011 01110000 01100101 01100001 01101011 00100001 |
| | |
| | #135 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 1,706
| Quote:
I didn't hear Bcgood's until just now. Bcgood - I really like the compression on the vocal. Care to share your treatment method? | |
| | |
| | #136 |
| Gear nut | git r dun ![]()
__________________ Mac Pro Quad 2.66, 6G, 250G/1TB - Protools|HD 7.4 - Digi Pre - Digi 96 I/O - Digi Sync - Focusrite LiquidChannel - Digi Command|8 - Alesis Masterlink - Korg PadKontrol - novation ReMOTE 37SL - Blue Bluebird Mic - Genelec 8040A Monitors - Waves SSL 4000 TDM http://www.MindPuck.com http://www.DaniaScrap.com |
| | |
| | #137 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2004 Location: Los Angeles ,Ca.
Posts: 5,766
| I'd be curious to put these up agians't my 16x's and golds. The transfo bypass would be a real good idea |
| | |
| | #138 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Mexico
Posts: 1,019
| |
| | |
| | #139 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: West Coast
Posts: 2,793
| Well, I actually didn't do another mix that is UBK's mix from the second post which was an AIF. I just mastered it. I did quite a bit of subtle processing and listening between my NHT's and my Senheiser headphones to get it dialed in the way I like it. I think I dialed in about 7 different, distinct processes altogether, (Maybe more). Thanks for the kind words UBK, it's nice to hear that you liked it also thanks for the post, this is what GS is all about IMHO. I can go into more detail later if people are interested. I might divulge some details of my top secret methods... ![]()
__________________ bcgood ![]() |
| | |
| | #140 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 1,706
| Quote:
Are you doing any mid/side processing? What kind of compressors? | |
| | |
| | #141 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 37
| 01010111 01101111 01110111 00101100 00100000 01110000 01101001 01100011 01110100 01110101 01110010 01100101 01110011 00100001 00100000 00100000 00001101 00001010 00001101 00001010 01001001 01100110 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100001 01110100 00100000 01010010 01000011 01000001 00100000 00110100 00110100 00100000 01100110 01100001 01101100 01101100 01110011 00100000 01101111 01110110 01100101 01110010 00101100 00100000 01101001 01110100 00100000 01110111 01101111 01110101 01101100 01100100 00100000 01100011 01101111 01101101 01110000 01101100 01100101 01110100 01100101 01101100 01111001 00100000 01110011 01101000 01100001 01110100 01110100 01100101 01110010 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100001 01110100 00100000 01100100 01110010 01110101 01101101 01101101 01100101 01110010 00101110 00100000 01001001 01110100 00100111 01110011 00100000 01100010 01101001 01100111 01100111 01100101 01110010 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100001 01101110 00100000 01101000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01101000 01100101 01100001 01100100 00100001 00100000 00100000 00001101 00001010 00001101 00001010 01000011 01110101 01101001 01100100 01100001 01110100 01100101 00100000 00100001 00100001 00100000 |
| | |
| | #142 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: DFW
Posts: 270
| Thanks U B K Looks like one of the best threads in a while is gone now. i'm sure Jules has his reasons, but i'm sorry it's been deleted. UBKs disclaimer in the first post of the thread told us that he had been paid to do the experiment. should it have been in all caps or what? so heres a recap of what we lost... 1. tracks of an interesting song, tracked through some great gear. interesting to compare the pictures of the mic placement with the raw tracks. i'm not sure i would have ever tried that without seeing those pictures. 2. a real comparison of two different converters. it was instructive, because we had the raw tracks to compare the finished mix to. 2. some GS re-mixes that took the song in different directions. i learned a lot from listening to those, and how different approaches were taken. i was looking forward to hearing where other folks might take those same tracks. this kind of content is EXACTLY the reason i lurk on gearslutz. so Greg, here's one guy at least that appreciated the effort. |
| | |
| | #143 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 399
| Oh drat, I knew I should have downloaded the tracks when I had the chance this morning, had a few ideas involving mixing in some strings from some old Nick Drake tracks and so on for fun. Oh well. I found it an interesting and informative thread despite it's obvious problems, but I appreciate the fact that this forum is moderated and kept clear of too much manufacturer bias. |
| | |
| | #144 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2005 Location: Waterbury CT, then Providence, RI
Posts: 1,871
| UBK to me has always seemed fair in his post's. Never got the sense that he was shady. I loved the test he did. If he was upfront and honest, I feel it should not have gotten pulled. There are enough bullshitters on here pimping gear. Go after them.. Can we get that dude Chris Crocker to make another plea.. Leave Britney, I mean UBK alone...!!! Thanks for the time u spent UBK.
__________________ Teee hee ha ha .... I wanna play wit chew. Butter's Does Samwell! http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4y...-in-the-bu_fun |
| | |
| | #145 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: West Coast
Posts: 2,793
| I think that a clear warning should have been sent out. I'm not sure the entire thread should have been deleted though. Unlike a lot of threads on this forum this one actually had uncompressed samples that greatly enhanced the value of the thread. I think there have been many more threads on this site that where more shady than that one. It was already clear that UBK and the maker had a deal so what's the point of deleting it after that is already out in the open?
__________________ bcgood ![]() |
| | |
| | #146 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: DFW
Posts: 270
| bcgood, your mix was cool, wish i'd saved it |
| | |
| | #147 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: West Coast
Posts: 2,793
|
__________________ bcgood ![]() |
| | |
| | #148 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2005 Location: Nesna, Norway
Posts: 880
| Quote:
![]() http://www.gearslutz.com/board/faq.p...q_dew_faq_item
__________________ "Creative work defines itself; therefore, confront the work." John Cage Gary Hoffman Arctic Circle Recording Studio | |
| | |
| | #149 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: DFW
Posts: 270
| Thanks for the link bcgood. i saved it this time ![]() Quote: | |
| | |
| | #150 |
| Lives for gear | most of the offense comes from Wave Distribution's rep using Greg's childlike enthusiasm with any new toy (and ability to write gushing flowery reviews) to sell A/D converters.. i count UBK/greg as a naive victim in this lil fiasco... i wonder if the picture of the jar of marijuana sent Jules over the edge on this one... WHAT WERE YOU THINKING, UBK?!??! JESUS ****, MAN.. he's lucky Gil didnt fire him for associating a Wave Distribution sponsored media event with illegal drugs.
__________________ 3WO - Mixing Without Tears "Tape is a mangler.." -- Slipperman // "The idea of the perfect album is this amorphous thing we're always aiming at. For us, it can mean something full of imperfection. Part of our aim has always been to destroy the sound in a beautiful way. It doesn't mean we expect everyone would like it. I'm not sure we will ever get there... but the whole point of making music is at least to aim at your own idea of perfection." -- Boards of Canada |
| |