![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #31 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Jan 2006 Location: Austria/LB
Posts: 258
|
I don't see the problem, aside from plug-ins reporting the wrong or no latency figures to the host. Really relevant are the 'latency compensation set to ALL' examples. If there's still some latency, there's something wrong going on ... All I can say that the UAD-1 and TC powercore plug-ins are perfectly compensated for and I'm on Logic 7.1.1. And: Always give the plug-in some time to adjust, start the bounce at least a bar before anything happens (therefore your 'weird' 1176 result in the 'Audio, Tracks and Instruments' example). Also stop and start playback in Logic, after you bypassed/enabled a latency inducing plugin. If you don't do this really funky stuff happens. Yes, MIDI will run out of sync with the 'ALL' option, can't believe they haven't corrected this yet. Must be a problem burried deep down Logic's architecture .... And yes, you _have_ to disable 'software monitoring' in Logic when overdubbing and compensation set to 'ALL' with a latency-inducing plug on a bus/master, otherwise the newely recorded audio will be out of sync. With software-monitoring 'off' all will be fine (monitor through your audio interface's application). If you know those 'design-flaws' you shouldn't really run into big troubles. aside from, .... later. ![]() cheers, bernd |
| | |
| | #32 | ||||
| Gear maniac Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 205
Thread Starter | Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
| ||||
| | |
| | #33 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 966
|
As far as I am aware of Cubase/Nuendo do not have this problem. Protools I don't know, but I guess neither. Regards, Roger |
| | |
| | #34 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Nov 2006 Location: LA
Posts: 171
|
I'm not sure that I ever expected third party plugin instruments like NI or Spectasonics to be perfectly compensated. I have noticed that I have to juggle RMX to get it to sit right sometimes, but I've found this true in PT as well. Some of the NI stuff can be real processor hogs, so I think I'd always check that... though I haven't done as thorough a test as you've done. I'm intrigued by the tests, but one question... why would you ever want to have latency compensation off? I'm not really understanding why this would be a part of the experiment...? thanx |
| | |
| | #35 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 205
Thread Starter | Because in logic documentation it says this option is only for DSP plugins users, otherwise you don't need this option, native plugins latency is supposed to be compensated anyway...but it's not !
|
| | |
| | #36 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2006 Location: HAMBURG
Posts: 701
|
you will certainly repeat the test on your new mac....dont forget to post the results, please |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PRO TOOLS HD LATENCY VS. LOGIC 7 PRO | Tetness | So much gear, so little time! | 63 | 8th February 2009 09:26 AM |
| Logic Pro 7.2 audio problem (on a Macbook) | rids | Music computers | 4 | 25th July 2006 09:49 AM |
| A little problem with latency | tduk | Music computers | 2 | 21st July 2006 12:44 AM |
| DP4/G4 Latency Problem | dbbubba | Music computers | 3 | 6th November 2005 05:45 PM |
| Logic interface, no latency? | drgregorio | Music computers | 3 | 28th May 2005 11:08 AM |
| |