![]() | All Advertisers |
| | #1 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Hollywood
Posts: 257
| McDSP plug-ins anyone had any experiance with these? i was looking at the waves ssl pack but these look pretty good too |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Maryland,USA
Posts: 2,264
| Most people seem to love McDSP. Me? I think they are only Ok. Analog Channel works sometimes, Filterbank is NOT a very good sounding EQ IMO. Sounds grainy and strident to me. I much prefer the Massenburg for super clean and the SSL E Channel for most general use.
__________________ Drew Mazurek Artist Direct Page Mixing ITB? Just because you're not good at it, doesn't mean it sucks. |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Gear interested Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Atlanta
Posts: 27
| Quote:
-Rin-
__________________ "Dude...Just play it like Michael Anthony" "Who's Michael Anthony?" | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 2,311
| Absolutely. If I had to strip down to only one plug-in bundle McDSP's Emerald Pack would certainly be my choice. I loved it so much we started carrying the products. I use them on every mix I do and have showed my clients an A/B between having them in or bypassed and have watched the jaws drop.
__________________ Joshua Aaron President/Chief Engineer AudioLot/AudioLot Studios High End Pro Audio Sales & Consulting Recording/Music Production/Mixing http://www.audiolot.com --------------- AudioLot is offering 10% off any purchase over $1000, up to $400 off until Nov. 30th, 2008. Use coupon code FALL08 when making your online purchase. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear | Filterbank rocks, and so does Compressor bank. Channel G is horrible IMO. Never really got much out of Analog Channel either. Never used Revolver, MC2000, or the ML4000.
__________________ _________________ "What is a crossfire hurricane & why wasn't I born in one?" Randy Wright http://www.myspace.com/djui5 |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Gear addict Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 346
| Quote:
i love mcdsp. i use filterbank everyday.and i use the waves ssl plugs everyday.both do different things. try them, and decide which one you love! hope this helps ![]() | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Mellrichstadt/Germany
Posts: 166
| If I had to choose just one EQ Plug and one Compressor Plug for Pro Tools it would definitely come down to Compressor and Filterbank. Great sound and super versatile. Especially Compressor Bank gives you a huge arsenal of different and great sounding compressor tones to choose from....
__________________ Markus Stock Engineer/Co-owner of: www.studioe.de |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 9
| Hi, Im relatively new to posting in here, but i thought id step in as this is a topic i actually know a lil' bit about! Ive been using mcdsp emerald bundle for the past couple of months and found the plugins to be excellent. Compressor Bank has some excellent vintage emulations (urei1176, dbx165, fairchild, LA2A) etc. Also, Revolver is defintately worth the investment, some of the M5k presets are amazing! Also, the new ML4000 plugin is pretty interestig, although im not totally convinced by the presets which have a tendancy to make everything sound rather "bright". In the plugin world there is nothing better than mcdsp... |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Fargo
Posts: 173
| Using McDSP with Digital Performer Has anyone used the Native McDSP ? I want to know if these plugs work as good native as with Pro Tools. Obviously there are limitations with the CPU thing, but I wonder if the Sonic character is the same. VATO |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Belgica
Posts: 461
| Any news on McDSP AU format? |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: 3rd Coast
Posts: 1,943
| There was a time when they sat at the top of the pile of plugin eqs, and they are still good, but quite a few other eq plugs have surfaced lately which are making Filterbank unimportant. Compressorbank still gets a bit of use but it's no longer my go-to compressor as it used to be. I think, as a bundle, they are useful and could be all you need to get a great mix. |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: tx
Posts: 8,819
| These are the two I use the most. MC 2000 is nice. I wish it had more gain sometimes, but it sounds very nice, very cushy at the top end for a plugin if you use a long release time. Revolver is nice, too. I've been using it for a few weeks, and I'm getting used to the ins and outs, but it's good a good amount of adjustability. |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,256
| ..you are getting so many differing opinions that this thread may not be useful to you. as an above poster suggested, get an iLok and do the 14-day demos. just a word of advice: only demo a few plugins at a time so you make sure you have ample time to spend with all of them. personally out of all the McDSP plugins i could take or leave them but the one i still use is FilterBank. i have EQs that are cleaner, such as the Sony Oxford and the Waves LinEQ, and i have EQs with more character, such as the URS 'A' and 'N' series. but sometimes i still find a use for FilterBank, which is very versatile at least in its GUI and setup. CompressorBank for me was cool at first until i got other plugins i prefer for compression (Waves SSL, Chandler/EMI). of course YMMV. ~j.d.
__________________ jdjustice.net |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,256
| Quote:
i believe "Native" just refers to the fact that these plugins run on your host computer, and not on a DSP card. i am not aware that McDSP's native plugins will run on any system except for Pro Tools, and i don't think this will change soon as McDSP is a Digidesign Development Partner (i think they are sticking with Digi for now). ~j.d.
__________________ jdjustice.net Last edited by jdjustice; 23rd November 2006 at 01:28 PM. Reason: clarity | |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Hollywood
Posts: 257
| thanks for all the replies. a friend of my mine said they kick ass and i just wanted to see what some of you guys thought of them..i forgot about that 14 day demo too..ill check it out ![]() |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 152
| Just to be different .... I think Channel G is superb (probably my most used plugin, and I have most of them), Analog Channel is great for roughing up over-clean takes, and Filter Bank is very usable (low DSP use but no Massenburg). Chrometone is ocassionally useful, but there are better amp sims around these days. Channel G is the Daddy for me though - the API compression sounds great, and the N and A series EQ is excellent, plus it's ultra felxible, allows side-chaining etc. I'm surprised Randy loves Filterbank and hates Channels G - I suspect some of the EQ' algorithms are the same, or certainly have the same origins - each to their own I guess. Haven't tried the limiter or multiband, and use TL Space for convolution so haven't bothered with Revolver. Jules |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 185
| Hi the Mcdsp stuf is allaround solid, would I mix everything with just the ncdsp eq today? No the Waves ssl Eq is more effective and natural in sound and use. I use it most every track. i think that the Digi Comp III is a great allround compressor just as the Mcdsp compressor.. the Analog channel works fine on some tracks, not that great on other tracks, I use it mor on individual tracks.. but i have to tell you the new ML400 is simply great! not only as mastering bus but on vocals, guitarrs, bass. Very flexible, great sounding.. happy thanks giviing to you all ![]() |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Gear addict Join Date: May 2005 Location: Northern NJ, USA
Posts: 318
| I have analog channel, and it has made a huge difference in my mixes. The key is to drive it correctly (yes, I have mix it like a record! I actually won MILAR and analog channel in their contest, and it has really made a nice difference, and is also the only thing I've ever won). Also, Charles Dye makes th epoint about using analog channel as a dual mono plug on stereo tracks and buses and that does make a difference. When I demoed it I didn't understand about driving it and felt it made no difference. As always, YMMV. |
| | |
| | #19 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
I had a lot of problems with the gain structure of Channel G. Plus the eq in it didn't seem to sound as good as in Filterbank. The compressor in it sucks IMO. It's about as good as the virtual dynamics in the 9098i. The damm thing would peak out all the time, and just a touch of eq would throw the gain through the roof. It was crazy. I know it was the plug-in because I'd take it off and use comp bank and filter bank and everything would be fine. Maybe I got a bad download or something...who knows. All I know is that plug-in irritated the shit outta me. The sound was crappy, it peaked a lot, etc. Got my vote as the most annoying plug-in ever. ![]()
__________________ _________________ "What is a crossfire hurricane & why wasn't I born in one?" Randy Wright http://www.myspace.com/djui5 | |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Nowhere fast
Posts: 37
| |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |