![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Help with new Pentium Duo Core PC! | tdawgg | Music computers | 6 | 15th October 2006 02:09 AM |
| Core 2 Duo - Motherboard recommendations | DeeDrive | Music computers | 0 | 3rd October 2006 10:25 PM |
| New iMac core 2 duo Logic results.... | illynoise | Music computers | 3 | 14th September 2006 11:52 PM |
| Intel core duo 2. performance stats ?? | manning1 | Music computers | 3 | 24th August 2006 11:03 AM |
| whats the difference between Centrino and Core Duo? | crew14 | Music computers | 3 | 6th August 2006 08:21 PM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear | What ? Core 2 duo is tops for audio ? Is this true ? will a 6700 2.4 ghz core 2 duo machine beat an Athlon 64 fx62 ? Is this because of the faster front side bus speeds and DDR2 memory speeds , or what ? If it´s true...mann... for 300 bucks I could have a faster processor than any amd ? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2004 Location: canada
Posts: 3,187
| i got my hands on a core 2 duo. from my testing...damn fast. first time ive liked intel....cos i'm an amd fan. but do your own testing and see your own conclusions. JUST REMEMBER.....before spending your buks... multiple cores are just THE START of a new exciting era. thus THINK......i believe lots more cores to come.
__________________ i'm just a dumb computer engr (ret'd)...."quantum computing is the future" running a native software studio daw...Powertracks and Reaper on amd. my little songs www.motagator.com/bmanning (saving up for pristine ADA convertors i cant afford...lol) |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear maniac | yeah, any core 2 duo will pretty much beat anything else. Intel is back on top for the time being. And if AMD doesn't get their act and pricing together, Intel might be there for a while. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 115
| About a year ago I got a really good deal on a HP Media Center PC (the kind with that big personal media drive bay in the front) and decided to make it my "Strictly for Audio Recording" computer because it is better than what I already had and it has a dual core processor, in this case an Pentium D 820--I just to delete all of the uneccesary software and deactivate needlss peripherals. As a Media Center PC, it had all types of bells and whistles, a coaxial TV cconnection, etc. Then the Core Duo came to prominence, promising td superior performance compared to the Pentium D. Fast forward a few months and now the Core 2 Duo is out, promising I think 60% more power than. Man I want a Core 2 Duo!!! |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear | wow !! Well this is good news,....I think... because I bet if I buy a core 2 duo and an Intel motherboard, then the daw system should be pretty stable , no ? I have a P4 3.4 ghz DAW now, with an Intel motherboard and is glitch free...... this is good news for Intel.... I have an AMD x2 4400 new in the box...anybody want it ? hahhaha |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Hamburg
Posts: 748
| Quote:
![]() | |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
NO $hit ??? Mann.... that was 550 bucks I spent about 6 months ago... down the drain !! I´m surprised that even the slowest core 2 duo would beat my amd athlon 64 x2 4400..... why ? the athlon has 2.2 mhz per processor ..... | |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Hamburg
Posts: 748
| Quote:
The architecture is just KICKASS!!! It is a very very good chip,but maybe you want to go for the 4mb cache version. | |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear | |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Hamburg
Posts: 748
| |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2004 Location: canada
Posts: 3,187
| luke... you said money down the drain. not being funny but...you might be saying the same in a years time if you jump in too early. it really depends how fast your studio revenue can pay for the machine. cos hi tech is compressing the time domain.....lol. and turning over fast. me personally i'm waiting for the dust to settle a bit as its early days for this new round of processor wars. also remember on a pc (and mac imho...) there are many internal architectural upgrades i feel still need to be addressed like the internal bus designs etc for more throughput to help audio applications..... in summary its MORE than just the processor. i feel faster/better internal bus and also hard drive technology is also needed. others might disagree with me...but i suspect that 2 years time will be the sweet spot. yeh...i KNOW.....ME TOO.....its tough to keep on passing the candy store without popping in and buying....lol. but one must be strong.....lol.
__________________ i'm just a dumb computer engr (ret'd)...."quantum computing is the future" running a native software studio daw...Powertracks and Reaper on amd. my little songs www.motagator.com/bmanning (saving up for pristine ADA convertors i cant afford...lol) |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 2,219
| The Core 2s are pretty sweet.... But how about those Quad Core Xeons....??! Those things are CRAZY. And its just the beginning.... We got screwed there for about 3 years where Moore's law just froze in time.... Now we're back to every 18 months, double the juice, or more. ![]() |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Lives for gear | I think you´re probably right ! Quote:
HI ! thanks Manning... I think you´re probably right...I´ve got two powercores and two uad´1´s that I plan on installing on that AMD x2 4400 machine with the Asus A8V deluxe...that hopefully will come back from Asus soon.... (I got a defective one !!) I´ll try to get that setup working , and after a year , upgrade my dsp cards to pci express, and upgrade to another PC platform like Intel quad cores or whatever is working nicely for audio at that time. thanks for the advice everyone !!! | |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Dublin, CA
Posts: 239
| Maybe you guys could give advice to someone who is using a single core processor and wants to upgrade to a dual core before starting his next project (me of course). It appears that for someone like me, the Intel Core Duo is the chip to get performance-wise. What do think? I was set on upgrading to one of the AMD X2 chips and then the Core Duo comes along and upsets my apple cart. Now I'm torn. Thanks in advance. Best Regards, Mike. |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 333
| Hi guys i seem to out of the game for a while now, what is the Intel equivalent of the AMD Dual Dual core Opterons ? is it the the Intel Xeon's ? i was looking into investing into a Dual Dual core Opteron but Intel looks much cheaper. With what chips from intel could i use to build a Dual Dual core or Quad core ?. I was looking recently at the Intel Xeon 5130 4 mb cache, and what mother board would you recommend ?. Thankyou for your time.
__________________ Sinewave. |
| | |
| | #16 | |
| Gear addict Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 394
| Quote:
The crashing happens most frequently when the host CPU starts getting high and the Powercore DSPs start getting filled up..... ie when you are getting right into something. To get UAD-1 and Powercore PCI/Mk2 working together at the same time with X2 you need to get a ULi chipset motherboard, or to heavily tweak an Nforce3. I've heard success stories with the Gigabyte K8U-939 as far as the ULi is concerned. Obviously don't just take my word for it, here is the Powercore Forum thread about it. I ended up getting a Core 2 Duo E6600 setup and overclocked it to 3.1Ghz. At this speed its about twice as fast as the X2 4400 at stock speed in my observations. No issues with the Powercore Mk2 or UAD-1 either. But please have a read at the Powercore thread before you lose any hair follicles over the Poco crashing the Asus board. | |
| | |
| | #17 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Windsor, England
Posts: 200
| Quote:
Using an AMD Dual dualcore system here myself. Its a lovely machine and works wonders in Nuendo/Cubase. The Intel equiv are Xeons yes, the most recent version 51xx (woodcrest) give AMAZING results in daw apps. Quadcore Xeons are out middle of Nov called (clovertowns.) These will be drop into 51xx boards with a bios update and then you would have a dual quadcore (octal) monster! :) I am actually speccing up this exact system at the moment, should be good......sad to see the old dual-dual AMD go tho, its still a beast of a machine but 4cpus to 8cpus is something I need to try......NOW! ;-) Yes, you can use any of the 51xx range, and you can upgrade them to quads later down the line. I am personally going to use this board... http://www.tyan.com/products/html/tempesti5000xt.html It has 3 pci slots and 3 pci-e slots, firewire, sas, sata. It also uses the later greengreek (5000X) chipset which gives better memory performance over the bensley (5000P or V). Mine should be here next week (UK) but you can already order them in the US.. http://www.computerhq.com/Tyan_hunde...id-761990.html It also comes in a non-sas version which is about $50 cheaper. A couple of others are: http://www.supermicro.com/products/m...000X/X7DAE.cfm and http://www.iwill.net/product_2.asp?p_id=108&sp=Y They are all very similar but I think Tyans is the best for Daw use and have really good support with these types of board. Btw, I have 2x 5130s for sale if your interested. Brand new in the box and never used. Cheers, Tom | |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2005 Location: Hillsboro, OR
Posts: 894
| If anybody wants a brand new E6700 Core 2 Duo chip for $400 bucks, PM me. They are $509 at new egg right now.
__________________ There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't. Jonaspark Mobile Recording: http://www.jonaspark.com http://www.myspace.com/mattdistad http://www.myspace.com/froghollowdaycamp |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Windsor, England
Posts: 200
| Fx Teleport doesnt actually give you more CPU though does it :-) It justs let you use multiple systems together (not always with the best results.) I am sure most people would, like myself prefer to have a single system doing all the work over multiple ones, especially with the added latency and inability to run slave plugin guis on the host machine. ten |
| | |
| | #20 | |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 333
| Quote:
Hey Tom Wow nice info ,Dual Quad core Xeons, what did you call it Octal monster, these are really exciting times, let me know how things are progressing with you. and thanks, Regards.
__________________ Sinewave. | |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: London/Cph
Posts: 498
| Upgraded recently from a pentium 4 3.3ghz to E6600 and I don't even know if it's 3-4 times faster or more. It just seems to chew plugins for breakfast, come back for seconds. With quads they can start bringing in the UAD neve1073's running native on every track. They won't, but they could ![]() |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |