Login / Register
 
Prelim Haswell Benchmarks
New Reply
Subscribe
jcschild
Thread Starter
#31
19th April 2013
Old 19th April 2013
  #31
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,859

Thread Starter
jcschild is offline
its more to do with power states we think.
when ivy came out we had the same issue but were able to tame it in the bios
this time will have to wait for a bios update.
not to mention we had to do a decent amount of voltage tweaking to get it semi stable OCed.
removing the factory lid voids warranty. while I a don't care about it with the Engineering sample its rather moot (other than finding out if that's one of the potential issues) I am not about to go modding every haswell and void warranty.

but yeah I may play with it as well. really need to wait on the updated bios first.
#32
19th April 2013
Old 19th April 2013
  #32
Gear addict
 
Goddard's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 347

Goddard is offline
Hmm, yeah, if Intel changed things with Haswell wrt core (and package?) C states compared to Sandy/Ivy which needs new BIOS support then that might well explain it.

Might be informative to check what's happening C-state-wise using Throttlestop (although dunno if it works with Haswell).
#33
26th April 2013
Old 26th April 2013
  #33
Lives for gear
 
Jovas's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Location: Amsterdam Area
Posts: 592

Jovas is offline
Thank you
#34
27th April 2013
Old 27th April 2013
  #34
Gear Head
 
soulranger's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 57

soulranger is offline
As a hobbyist, I lurk here more than I post, learning from all the great folks here. I do find great interest in this thread and felt the need to post. Even as a hobbyist, I have reached the limitations of my good ole Q6600 with plugin heavy projects. (Obviously, I don't upgrade frequently) I know I can't go wrong with a 3930k but with the surprising results here with the 4770k, would going the Haswell route suffice? I have no idea what the new 1150 mobo's will cost but it looks as if the 4770k will be priced in the ballpark of the 3770k. I understand that the 3930k will out perform the 4770k but I'm looking at "best bang for the buck" scenario. I guess the kicker is the price of a good lga 1150 mobo.
#35
29th April 2013
Old 29th April 2013
  #35
Gear addict
 
mintyfreshbeats's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 448

mintyfreshbeats is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by soulranger View Post
As a hobbyist, I lurk here more than I post, learning from all the great folks here. I do find great interest in this thread and felt the need to post. Even as a hobbyist, I have reached the limitations of my good ole Q6600 with plugin heavy projects. (Obviously, I don't upgrade frequently) I know I can't go wrong with a 3930k but with the surprising results here with the 4770k, would going the Haswell route suffice? I have no idea what the new 1150 mobo's will cost but it looks as if the 4770k will be priced in the ballpark of the 3770k. I understand that the 3930k will out perform the 4770k but I'm looking at "best bang for the buck" scenario. I guess the kicker is the price of a good lga 1150 mobo.
Same here.

Wondering if I should wait a few months, or just go with the 3770k for my next build.

Am willing to wait another 3 months or so if it means 10-20% improvement at roughly the same price.
__________________
maxtannone.com
#36
30th April 2013
Old 30th April 2013
  #36
Lives for gear
 
zephonic's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 2,333

zephonic is offline
Looks like Sandy E is still the one to beat, no?
#37
30th April 2013
Old 30th April 2013
  #37
Gear Head
 
soulranger's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 57

soulranger is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by zephonic View Post
Looks like Sandy E is still the one to beat, no?
Head to head I would say yes. 3930k beats 4770k. But if the heat issues are resolved with a bios update, it may be possible that the 4770k could rival the 3930k (stock) with some modest overclocking. If the 1150 mobo's are priced near the 1155's, this could result in saving some ca$h. If I did this for a living, I would go with the 3930k no questions.
#38
3rd May 2013
Old 3rd May 2013
  #38
Lives for gear
 
matucha's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Posts: 3,464

matucha is offline
Still can't find any reason to upgrade from Q6600. Together with UAD2 quad I rarely need more. Even with 88.2 projects. Though I rarely use softsynths or samplers...
#39
7th May 2013
Old 7th May 2013
  #39
Gear Head
 
soulranger's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 57

soulranger is offline
#40
7th May 2013
Old 7th May 2013
  #40
Gear addict
 
mintyfreshbeats's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 448

mintyfreshbeats is offline
Sweet.
#41
7th May 2013
Old 7th May 2013
  #41
Gear interested
 
userfriendly's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Location: Scotland
Posts: 28

userfriendly is offline
Only one more month...
#42
10th May 2013
Old 10th May 2013
  #42
Gear Head
 
soulranger's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 57

soulranger is offline
A little more info...
Apparently Haswell stuff can be ordered online at This Site in China>

If my Yuan conversion calculations are correct, the ASUS Z87 Sabertooth is selling for around $320 USD and the 4770k chip is selling for around $368 USD????. The site is in Chinese of course and a bit convoluted.

At the moment I am leaning on waiting for the 4770k for my upgrade (based on the very surprising benchmarks) vs the 3930k unless Scott or someone else knowledgeable thinks otherwise.
#43
10th May 2013
Old 10th May 2013
  #43
Lives for gear
 
TranscendingM's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 2,039

Send a message via Skype™ to TranscendingM
TranscendingM is offline
My 3930k from ADK, OC'ed, is a friggin beast. I have made Nebula my bitch with this one.

While I am at it, a shout out to ADK. I had two minor issues that they helped me clear up, remotely. It was very cool! Great products, great support.
#44
11th May 2013
Old 11th May 2013
  #44
Lives for gear
 
DAW PLUS's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: Germany, Worldwide
Posts: 3,068
My Recordings/Credits

Send a message via Skype™ to DAW PLUS
DAW PLUS is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by soulranger View Post
A little more info...
Apparently Haswell stuff can be ordered online at This Site in China>

If my Yuan conversion calculations are correct, the ASUS Z87 Sabertooth is selling for around $320 USD and the 4770k chip is selling for around $368 USD????. The site is in Chinese of course and a bit convoluted.

At the moment I am leaning on waiting for the 4770k for my upgrade (based on the very surprising benchmarks) vs the 3930k unless Scott or someone else knowledgeable thinks otherwise.
Haswell has not been released yet, I have no clue why anyone would pay extra to buy prerelease samples which will be stuffed with issues instead of decent warranty.
__________________
Leon
XI-MACHINES workstations
SSL & VSL certified. Pro Tools for Windows qualified systems.
#45
11th May 2013
Old 11th May 2013
  #45
Gear Head
 
soulranger's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 57

soulranger is offline
As far as the Chinese site goes, I couldn't tell if they were taking orders pre-release or actually selling pre-release samples. This was the first time I saw anything about the ASUS Z87 Sabertooth board however. Just posting as a curious reference, I would hope no one would try to purchase anything until things are officially released.

As far as the 3930, I know it's a beast and would be incredible but if the 4770k was close, it could save my budget a couple hundred bucks.


Sent from my DROID BIONIC
jcschild
Thread Starter
#46
11th May 2013
Old 11th May 2013
  #46
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,859

Thread Starter
jcschild is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by TranscendingM View Post
My 3930k from ADK, OC'ed, is a friggin beast. I have made Nebula my bitch with this one.

While I am at it, a shout out to ADK. I had two minor issues that they helped me clear up, remotely. It was very cool! Great products, great support.


thank you!

Scott
ADK
#47
14th May 2013
Old 14th May 2013
  #47
Gear Head
 
soulranger's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 57

soulranger is offline


Since my skills related to this data are quite weak, is there anything in these benchies that would account for the reason why the 4770k did so well vs the 3770k in DAW performance?
#48
14th May 2013
Old 14th May 2013
  #48
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,737

CPhoenix is online now
Quote:
Originally Posted by matucha View Post
Though I rarely use softsynths
that's why :-)

Man.. I have an 3930K now. Softsynths pose no problems. But when I record from my external sound modules, or record just audio... i think the CPU is still on 1% lol.
__________________
www.conealusa.com - Custom Hoodies. Comfortable to wear while producing/mixing. Designs are stylish and eye-catching to wear while performing. Starting at $48.99
#49
14th May 2013
Old 14th May 2013
  #49
Lives for gear
 
DAW PLUS's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: Germany, Worldwide
Posts: 3,068
My Recordings/Credits

Send a message via Skype™ to DAW PLUS
DAW PLUS is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by soulranger View Post


Since my skills related to this data are quite weak, is there anything in these benchies that would account for the reason why the 4770k did so well vs the 3770k in DAW performance?
You can see that benchmarks from Cinebench and below the Haswell scores better. But indeed generally it is not a winner on all levels.
jcschild
Thread Starter
#50
14th May 2013
Old 14th May 2013
  #50
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,859

Thread Starter
jcschild is offline
also none of these tests are real world tests in fact pretty much useless
#51
14th May 2013
Old 14th May 2013
  #51
Gear Head
 
soulranger's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 57

soulranger is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcschild View Post
also none of these tests are real world tests in fact pretty much useless
That's what I figured...I guess the only true benchmark test of these processors in relation to true DAW performance is the DAW benchmark test demonstrated here in Scott's original post. Curiosity just gets the best of me as to why the 4770k does so much better with audio when everything I read says that it's just marginally better than the 3770K in general performance. Most articles deal with the power consumption and the better GPU.

After all of this deliberation and debate I'll probably end up with the damn 3930k after all
#52
15th May 2013
Old 15th May 2013
  #52
Lives for gear
 
valis's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: Northwest USA
Posts: 4,675

valis is offline
Well it wouldn't be the newer floating point/AVX2 features that lead to the theoretical speedups, support for that won't show up in our plugins & software immediately.

However the problem with ANY of those benchmarks is they're largely bound by computational limits, system bandwidth, or memory & core scheduling etc. Audio workloads balance i/o tasks to peripherals (serving your audio buffer and possibly dsp cards) and some degree of disk access along with the computational limits being stressed above.

Ie, I can hit my cores 100% across any machine when rendering in After Effects, Softimage/Mental Ray, Maya/Renderman etc... These tasks are largely bound by the Cache sizes in a cpu design (which is why Xeons with larger caches still work well for this), and how well a core design schedules heavy computational loads. Ie, the tasks stay largely on-die and in-cache, much like ALL of the benchmarks listed above with a possible exception of the media encoder (which has to track data across larger blocks of time than will fit into a cpu cache). So Cinebench sort of loosely correlates to some of thses workloads...

However Audio is a *streaming data* as well as computational task, which is why we spend time looking for bottlenecks in the i/o end as well. For CPU-limits I typically find my machines run Logic, Cubase, Ableton etc to more like 70-90% of 'theoretical peak' when used at reasonable latencies (i'm ignoring hyperthreading which varies a lot more to simplify my example). This is assuming I'm using enough 'small' plugins to get a highly distributed load too! Each application has its own 'core loading' issues it seems....and a need to balance that with the GUI, user interaction and midi/timecode 'engines' in the code.

Metrics like measuring DPC Latency and watching i/o transactions help identify issues when bottlenecks exist. But quantifying i/o transaction load otherwise is a more difficult task which in no way correlates to running SuperPi, wPrime & Photoshop benchmarks. I'd wait for more results from jschild & DAW plus imo...

Also the platform for the 3930k has other benefits, such as additional PCIe lanes eh...
#53
15th May 2013
Old 15th May 2013
  #53
Gear Head
 
soulranger's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 57

soulranger is offline
@valis....Thanks so much for that detailed response ( some of it was a bit over my head but I'm learning)
#54
15th May 2013
Old 15th May 2013
  #54
Lives for gear
 
valis's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: Northwest USA
Posts: 4,675

valis is offline
It's ok I should probably aim for more brevity anyway =]
#55
15th May 2013
Old 15th May 2013
  #55
Lives for gear
 
UltimateOutsider's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: Portland, OR

UltimateOutsider is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by CPhoenix View Post
that's why :-)

Man.. I have an 3930K now. Softsynths pose no problems. But when I record from my external sound modules, or record just audio... i think the CPU is still on 1% lol.
Man, tell me about it. The three-year-old PC in my sig has held up for me wonderfully until just the past two weeks when I did my first-ever song entirely using soft synths. Oh brother, I was freezing tracks left and right.

If I end up doing more completely ITB projects I might be due for an upgrade.
__________________
My SoundCloud | My DAW Specs
#56
16th May 2013
Old 16th May 2013
  #56
Gear interested
 
userfriendly's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Location: Scotland
Posts: 28

userfriendly is offline
Is it June yet?
#57
31st May 2013
Old 31st May 2013
  #57
Lives for gear
 
ohmicide's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,296
My Recordings/Credits

ohmicide is offline
so will it be worth it to wait for these or is it safe to go for a 3770k or 3820?
__________________
itsinvader.com
#58
31st May 2013
Old 31st May 2013
  #58
Lives for gear
 
UltimateOutsider's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: Portland, OR

UltimateOutsider is offline
Hehe, Scott got a name check for this thread (or his work on which it's based) in the latest Sound on Sound... the PC Notes article near the end.

jcschild
Thread Starter
#59
31st May 2013
Old 31st May 2013
  #59
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,859

Thread Starter
jcschild is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by UltimateOutsider View Post
Hehe, Scott got a name check for this thread (or his work on which it's based) in the latest Sound on Sound... the PC Notes article near the end.

LOL to quote a movie "hey I am somebody now!"

is it online or just in the mag?
thanks to the author!

in a few days I will have the retail versions to see if this heat issue is there.
normally by now I would have this system up for sale but I am treading carefully with this
and it might be the first system in a very long time where we don't offer an overclocked version. (last one was intels "Preshot") (Prescott)
same issues massive heat stock hitting thermal shut downs on burn in.

Scott
ADk
#60
31st May 2013
Old 31st May 2013
  #60
Gear Head
 
soulranger's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 57

soulranger is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcschild View Post
LOL to quote a movie "hey I am somebody now!"

is it online or just in the mag?
It's online!
New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn  Submit Thread to Google+ Google+ 
 
Topic:
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Forum Jump

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.