Gainstaging (analog to digital path) - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Music Computers

Gainstaging (analog to digital path)
Topic: New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 1st November 2012   #1
Gear interested
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 24

Thread Starter
Gainstaging (analog to digital path)

Hello everyone, I've posted this on the Cubase forum, but as it's a more general question of interest I figured I'd try here too.

I'll phrase my question in terms of what I'm seeking to do (hopefully this will narrow the response down a bit): I'll be recording several songs using a combination of live instruments (synths, drum machines, guitars), vst instruments, and a couple found samples. I'd like to know how to properly set levels at each stage in order to achieve optimal results (clarity, no clipping, flexibility for master house, etc.). I'm aware people vary in their opinions about gain-staging, but all I'm seeking is a workable/safe solution so I can move forward with the project. (I've never paid any heed to gain staging practices before but I want to give it a shot this time).

My signal chain is:

INSTRUMENT (analog) --> FMR PRE --> FMR compressor --> ALESIS multimix (parallel aux send --> lexicon reverb) --> RME Fireface UC (interface/converter) --> CUBASE.

Can anyone detail the amount of gain/input/output level I should apply at each stage (either that or a general working theory that I can take moving forward)?

1. Instrument
2. Pre
3. Compressor
4. Mixing board/Effects loop
5. Interface/converter
6. Cubase

With regards to Cubase: I've been reading that I'm to have my peaks be at around -12 in the meter (varies according to opinion) when the signal hits Cubase. Is that about right?

I'm confused about that part. Do I adjust input gain for each channel accordingly, so that the peaks hit -12, or do I control this by means of my interfaces mixing software (totalmix), or otherwise? What for the fader position? Trim?!

At the moment, I'm seeking a way to move forward, more of a what should I try rather than a why behind each process.

Thanks!

Dan
mr.danielnewell is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st November 2012   #2
Lives for gear
 
waveterm's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,869

Start by posting this in the correct Forum.

WT
waveterm is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anyone know why bouncing digitally from Protools to digital tape sounds better? Riddler So much gear, so little time! 18 30th January 2013 12:41 AM
monitoring: to dsp, or not to dsp? jdjustice High end 34 7th February 2010 07:06 PM
Anybody switched from Sonar to DP? amuro73 Music Computers 9 8th February 2007 09:29 PM
DP4+ modding to digital i/o (??) steviesteve Geekslutz forum 0 24th January 2007 07:26 PM
What to blame: FF800, DP 4.61, OSX 10.3, or me? Clueless Music Computers 6 5th December 2006 04:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:32 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.