Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Music computers

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 16th July 2006, 10:56 PM   #1
T_R_S
Lives for gear
 
T_R_S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canuk
Posts: 3,861
SSL vs what else? SSL

With all the SSL Plug-ins out these days Compare for yourself
the Contenders:

01.wav = Digidesign Impact TDM
02.wav = Waves SSL TDM
03.wav = Waves SSL RTAS
04.wav = SSL Duende
05.wav = Focusrite Liquid Mix with SSL compressor sample
06.wav = URS 1980 TDM
07.wav = URS 1980 RTAS
Attached Files
File Type: wav 01.wav (5.58 MB, 21096 views)
File Type: wav 02.wav (5.58 MB, 22008 views)
File Type: wav 03.wav (5.58 MB, 21226 views)
File Type: wav 04.wav (5.58 MB, 23014 views)
File Type: wav 05.wav (5.58 MB, 17458 views)
T_R_S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th July 2006, 11:01 PM   #2
T_R_S
Lives for gear
 
T_R_S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canuk
Posts: 3,861
Last 3 Files
Attached Files
File Type: wav 06.wav (5.58 MB, 16577 views)
File Type: wav 07.wav (5.58 MB, 14988 views)
File Type: wav No Comp.wav (5.58 MB, 16592 views)
T_R_S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th July 2006, 11:05 PM   #3
T_R_S
Lives for gear
 
T_R_S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canuk
Posts: 3,861
The Settings if anyone cares to post a hardware SSL Comp
Attached Thumbnails
ssl-vs-what-else-ssl-picture-2.jpg  
T_R_S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th July 2006, 11:08 PM   #4
horseface
Gear maniac
 
horseface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 196
The Duende one sounds the best.

horseface is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th July 2006, 11:14 PM   #5
not_so_new
Lives for gear
 
not_so_new's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by horseface
The Duende one sounds the best.

My pick as well....

LOL


T_R_S, any chance of posting the original unprocessed files as well?
__________________
Michael
not_so_new is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th July 2006, 11:51 PM   #6
3rdeyeKnight
Lives for gear
 
3rdeyeKnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 544
I was tossed between the Duende and the Digidesign Impact...I think the Digidesign Impact sounds more favorable to this type of song..it sounds slightly warmer to my ears...this is a great sounding song by the way...I love that whole 70's dance vibe with the female vocals..did you produce this T_R_S?
__________________
-ignorance is not a trend-
3rdeyeKnight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2006, 12:01 AM   #7
T_R_S
Lives for gear
 
T_R_S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canuk
Posts: 3,861
I guess I should have said this is a blind test
The Comps listed are not in the correct order. The file NOCOMP.wav is no compression
1st hint Wrong guess 01.wav is NOT Duende
T_R_S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2006, 12:03 AM   #8
not_so_new
Lives for gear
 
not_so_new's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by T_R_S
I guess I should have said this is a blind test
The Comps listed are not in the correct order. The file NOCOMP.wav is no compression



Sorry I missed that part.... carry on....

lol

Thanks man.
__________________
Michael
not_so_new is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2006, 12:45 AM   #9
upscaps
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 278
Quote:
Originally Posted by T_R_S
1st hint Wrong guess 01.wav is NOT Duende
ha! here we go again
upscaps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2006, 12:46 AM   #10
audiomichael
Lives for gear
 
audiomichael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: L. A.-ish
Posts: 1,812
Wow. I was expecting a much wider variation between the files. How much gain reduction are you hitting?

Honestly I like the nocomp version the best, followed by 1 and 7.
audiomichael is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2006, 01:02 AM   #11
3rdeyeKnight
Lives for gear
 
3rdeyeKnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 544
In that case, I like #5....#1 sounds a little more up front but #5 compliments the style of music that I like. Did you produce that song T_R_S?
__________________
-ignorance is not a trend-
3rdeyeKnight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2006, 01:29 AM   #12
Old Dog
Gear Head
 
Old Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 53
Wow! That is nerve racking. They all sound quite similar. There does seem to be some variation in the perceived level of some of the files, but if the settings are the same for each of the plugs it's a fair comparison. It could be how the comp squishes the highs differently which makes it appear softer. I did obviously have to match the "no comp" version and I have to agree with some of the other posts, it does sound really good as is.

Anyhoo, I like #6. Seems to be the most open while having that SSL "grab." I won't even begin to guess which one is which they are all so similar.
__________________
Peace,
Old Dog
Old Dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2006, 06:28 AM   #13
thermos
Lives for gear
 
thermos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,730
I liked 5 and 6.....
thermos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2006, 08:44 AM   #14
krid
Gear addict
 
krid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: France
Posts: 449
I liked #6 the best and it does remind me a lot the G384 sound.
krid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2006, 09:41 AM   #15
coder
Gear nut
 
coder's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 115
#6 fav, then #5 and #3...
not so: #1,#2,#7
coder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2006, 10:25 AM   #16
not_so_new
Lives for gear
 
not_so_new's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,654
First off.. wow what a great mix!!! Really nice work.



Is this your mix? It sounds like Natalie Merchant so maybe it is off one of her CD's, I don't know, I don't have anything from her (but she is cool).

Anyway...

Second I agree with others that there is not a huge difference to my ears with any of these but I am listening on phones so take this for what it is worth. 4 kind of stands out to me as having a little better middle, the snare is not a rounded on this as it is on 5 for instance (which would be my least favorite).

So all ITB? If it is then this is another good example of a great ITB mix that makes me less worried about hardware goodies... again hats off man, great mix.
__________________
Michael
not_so_new is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2006, 10:46 AM   #17
Ruudman
Lives for gear
 
Ruudman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Norway
Posts: 2,869
Using my earphones/laptop, I believe example 1 to be URS 1980.

But it's hard to say, having not tested Duende and Liquid Mix.



ruudman
__________________
Working Class Hero



Visit this website of Noma Children Hospital Sokoto
Ruudman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2006, 10:52 AM   #18
aussie_techie
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 2,631
good song and mix overall the differenences in the plugs sound very subtle but i would like to hear how the real hardware compares, no matter how good a plug-in its never the same as hardware.
aussie_techie is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2006, 11:49 AM   #19
Sammy
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 186
I'm liking #2 the best so far...
Sammy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2006, 11:58 AM   #20
The Beatsmith
Lives for gear
 
The Beatsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 1,555
Send a message via AIM to The Beatsmith Send a message via MSN to The Beatsmith
Are you sure the auto release on the Duende is totally working?
The Beatsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2006, 11:59 AM   #21
RoundBadge
Lives for gear
 
RoundBadge's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Los Angeles ,Ca.
Posts: 7,350
I like #6 [has some bounce and depth]..and the no comp the best
7 was ok
The rest seem kinda flat compared to 6.
RoundBadge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2006, 03:26 PM   #22
Old Dog
Gear Head
 
Old Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by aussie_techie
... i would like to hear how the real hardware compares, no matter how good a plug-in its never the same as hardware.
It might be good as a point of reference, but the point of the "test" is to compare the various plug ins to each other, not how much they sound like the original.

I liked #6. I don't really care how much it sounds like the real thing. It sounds the best to my ears. Would I buy the plug? I just might. Would I buy an SSL? No freakin' way.

Why is it every thread around here has someone chompin' at the bit to fire up the "hardware sounds better" argument. If you don't like plugs, don't buy them, and quit bending the ear of those of us who do. It's an old, stale, dead debate and it's REALLY tiresome.
__________________
Peace,
Old Dog
Old Dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2006, 04:07 PM   #23
aussie_techie
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 2,631
I’m not saying that hardware will always sound better, a plug-in can give you just what you need and if its something different not just an emulation there will be times where no hardware can do the same thing and having every piece of hardware that you can have an emulation of just isn’t feasible anyway. the point is they are two different things and no matter how good an emulation is its not the same as hardware. That doesn’t make it better or worse just that it is different.
I would be interested to hear the hardware unit as a references not because im going to run out and buy an SSL. If all these companies are going to use the 'have every piece of hardware in one box' to sell their products then its fair to make a comparison to the real thing. it doesn’t detract from how good a plug-in is in its own right but it often begs the question of why they call it the same thing as the hardware unit.
aussie_techie is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2006, 04:30 PM   #24
midigod
Gear maniac
 
midigod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 175
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Dog
It might be good as a point of reference, but the point of the "test" is to compare the various plug ins to each other, not how much they sound like the original.
While in general that's true, I think this test is different, because it includes Duende. From the SSL site:
"Based on the digital technology behind SSL’s C-Series consoles, Duende delivers the complete SSL mix experience"
Also,
"...an authentic SSL channel strip with filters, E and G series EQ and dynamics processing, as well as the legendary SSL Stereo Bus Compressor. "

Since this product is being made by the very company being replicated, (and in print ads, SSL says "Not just an emulation - it's the real deal"), then I think it's very valid to ask what it sounds like comapred to other SSL products.

-Craig
midigod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2006, 04:50 PM   #25
Old Dog
Gear Head
 
Old Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by aussie_techie
If all these companies are going to use the 'have every piece of hardware in one box' to sell their products then its fair to make a comparison to the real thing. it doesn’t detract from how good a plug-in is in its own right but it often begs the question of why they call it the same thing as the hardware unit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by midigod
Since this product is being made by the very company being replicated, (and in print ads, SSL says "Not just an emulation - it's the real deal"), then I think it's very valid to ask what it sounds like comapred to other SSL products.
Good points, guys. They are all trying to sell these as emus of the real thing, so which one really does sound like the real thing. I don't think it would have much bearing on my purchase though. I would look at the plug that most pleased my ears. Back when the Waves SSL plugs came out there was a shootout with the real SSL buss comp, Waves and URS. I liked URS the best even though it didn't sound the most like the original. It will be interesting to see what #6 is. I'm afraid it's the Duende, cause I'd hate to have to shell out that kind of money for that sound.
__________________
Peace,
Old Dog
Old Dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th July 2006, 04:54 PM   #26
Sammy
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 186
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Dog
It will be interesting to see what #6 is. I'm afraid it's the Duende, cause I'd hate to have to shell out that kind of money for that sound.
Well, you could always do worse (like buying a C200 for that sound)
Sammy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2006, 12:55 AM   #27
T_R_S
Lives for gear
 
T_R_S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canuk
Posts: 3,861
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Beatsmith
Are you sure the auto release on the Duende is totally working?
Well that question would be better off put to SSL .. but Duende has some bugs, and I found them in about 30 seconds from install
T_R_S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2006, 01:08 AM   #28
The Beatsmith
Lives for gear
 
The Beatsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 1,555
Send a message via AIM to The Beatsmith Send a message via MSN to The Beatsmith
Hi

That was me telling you, in a round about way, that it doesn't work yet! ...so your test isn't really fair.

It should come soon though... what it currently does is pretty pleasant! But not correct.

Cheers!
The Beatsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2006, 01:40 AM   #29
upscaps
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 278
i may in the minority but i like the no comp version the best.
upscaps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2006, 02:36 AM   #30
InjuredEar
Gear interested
 
InjuredEar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 11
Just curious T_R_S,
Looking at the pictures, the Duende threshold is just a notch below +20, while the Waves' threshold is just a notch below +15, though they're both at the same visual setting.

Does this mean that the threshold for the Duende was +18 while the threshold on the Waves was at +14, and that makes for a difference in how the 2 plugs behave?
Were all the plugs showing similar amounts of needle deflection (and is that even a measure you can't trust since that's modelled too?)

Thanks,
Greg
InjuredEar is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Waves SSL and Duende SSL: both from the same company?! Farshad So much gear, so little time! 33 12th October 2009 09:44 PM
CHRIS LORD-ALGE’S SSL SETTINGS NOW AVAILABLE AS PART OF WAVES’ SSL BUNDLE The Press Desk at Gearslutz.com New Product Alert! 25 13th April 2008 12:32 PM
If SSL consoles are the Holy Grail, why aren't SSL channel strips AlanTide So much gear, so little time! 39 9th April 2008 09:08 PM
Waves SSL vs SSL FX G384 vs URS 1980 - The advanced Test theother High end 237 5th December 2006 09:59 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0
You Rated this Thread: