![]() | All Advertisers |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Canuk
Posts: 3,861
| SSL vs what else? SSL With all the SSL Plug-ins out these days Compare for yourself the Contenders: 01.wav = Digidesign Impact TDM 02.wav = Waves SSL TDM 03.wav = Waves SSL RTAS 04.wav = SSL Duende 05.wav = Focusrite Liquid Mix with SSL compressor sample 06.wav = URS 1980 TDM 07.wav = URS 1980 RTAS
__________________ === PCIe HD1 Core Card - 192 Analog I/O Plus a Surplus Sale ![]() DONATE TO HAITI RELIEF TODAY |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Canuk
Posts: 3,861
| Last 3 Files
__________________ === PCIe HD1 Core Card - 192 Analog I/O Plus a Surplus Sale ![]() DONATE TO HAITI RELIEF TODAY |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Canuk
Posts: 3,861
| The Settings if anyone cares to post a hardware SSL Comp
__________________ === PCIe HD1 Core Card - 192 Analog I/O Plus a Surplus Sale ![]() DONATE TO HAITI RELIEF TODAY |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 196
| The Duende one sounds the best. ![]() |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,654
| Quote:
LOL T_R_S, any chance of posting the original unprocessed files as well?
__________________ Michael | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 544
| I was tossed between the Duende and the Digidesign Impact...I think the Digidesign Impact sounds more favorable to this type of song..it sounds slightly warmer to my ears...this is a great sounding song by the way...I love that whole 70's dance vibe with the female vocals..did you produce this T_R_S?
__________________ -ignorance is not a trend- |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Canuk
Posts: 3,861
| I guess I should have said this is a blind test The Comps listed are not in the correct order. The file NOCOMP.wav is no compression 1st hint Wrong guess 01.wav is NOT Duende
__________________ === PCIe HD1 Core Card - 192 Analog I/O Plus a Surplus Sale ![]() DONATE TO HAITI RELIEF TODAY |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,654
| Quote:
Sorry I missed that part.... carry on.... lol Thanks man.
__________________ Michael | |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 278
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: L. A.-ish
Posts: 1,812
| Wow. I was expecting a much wider variation between the files. How much gain reduction are you hitting? Honestly I like the nocomp version the best, followed by 1 and 7. |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 544
| In that case, I like #5....#1 sounds a little more up front but #5 compliments the style of music that I like. Did you produce that song T_R_S?
__________________ -ignorance is not a trend- |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 53
| Wow! That is nerve racking. They all sound quite similar. There does seem to be some variation in the perceived level of some of the files, but if the settings are the same for each of the plugs it's a fair comparison. It could be how the comp squishes the highs differently which makes it appear softer. I did obviously have to match the "no comp" version and I have to agree with some of the other posts, it does sound really good as is. Anyhoo, I like #6. Seems to be the most open while having that SSL "grab." I won't even begin to guess which one is which they are all so similar.
__________________ Peace, Old Dog |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,730
| I liked 5 and 6..... |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: France
Posts: 449
| I liked #6 the best and it does remind me a lot the G384 sound. |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Gear nut Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 115
| #6 fav, then #5 and #3... not so: #1,#2,#7 |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,654
| First off.. wow what a great mix!!! Really nice work. Is this your mix? It sounds like Natalie Merchant so maybe it is off one of her CD's, I don't know, I don't have anything from her (but she is cool). Anyway... Second I agree with others that there is not a huge difference to my ears with any of these but I am listening on phones so take this for what it is worth. 4 kind of stands out to me as having a little better middle, the snare is not a rounded on this as it is on 5 for instance (which would be my least favorite). So all ITB? If it is then this is another good example of a great ITB mix that makes me less worried about hardware goodies... again hats off man, great mix.
__________________ Michael |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Norway
Posts: 2,869
| Using my earphones/laptop, I believe example 1 to be URS 1980. But it's hard to say, having not tested Duende and Liquid Mix. ruudman |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 2,631
| good song and mix overall the differenences in the plugs sound very subtle but i would like to hear how the real hardware compares, no matter how good a plug-in its never the same as hardware. |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: May 2004 Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 186
| I'm liking #2 the best so far... |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Lives for gear | Are you sure the auto release on the Duende is totally working? ![]() |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2004 Location: Los Angeles ,Ca.
Posts: 7,350
| I like #6 [has some bounce and depth]..and the no comp the best 7 was ok The rest seem kinda flat compared to 6. |
| | |
| | #22 | |
| Gear Head Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 53
| Quote:
I liked #6. I don't really care how much it sounds like the real thing. It sounds the best to my ears. Would I buy the plug? I just might. Would I buy an SSL? No freakin' way. Why is it every thread around here has someone chompin' at the bit to fire up the "hardware sounds better" argument. If you don't like plugs, don't buy them, and quit bending the ear of those of us who do. It's an old, stale, dead debate and it's REALLY tiresome.
__________________ Peace, Old Dog | |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 2,631
| I’m not saying that hardware will always sound better, a plug-in can give you just what you need and if its something different not just an emulation there will be times where no hardware can do the same thing and having every piece of hardware that you can have an emulation of just isn’t feasible anyway. the point is they are two different things and no matter how good an emulation is its not the same as hardware. That doesn’t make it better or worse just that it is different. I would be interested to hear the hardware unit as a references not because im going to run out and buy an SSL. If all these companies are going to use the 'have every piece of hardware in one box' to sell their products then its fair to make a comparison to the real thing. it doesn’t detract from how good a plug-in is in its own right but it often begs the question of why they call it the same thing as the hardware unit. |
| | |
| | #24 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Colorado
Posts: 175
| Quote:
"Based on the digital technology behind SSL’s C-Series consoles, Duende delivers the complete SSL mix experience" Also, "...an authentic SSL channel strip with filters, E and G series EQ and dynamics processing, as well as the legendary SSL Stereo Bus Compressor. " Since this product is being made by the very company being replicated, (and in print ads, SSL says "Not just an emulation - it's the real deal"), then I think it's very valid to ask what it sounds like comapred to other SSL products. -Craig | |
| | |
| | #25 | ||
| Gear Head Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 53
| Quote:
Quote:
__________________ Peace, Old Dog | ||
| | |
| | #26 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: May 2004 Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 186
| Quote:
![]() | |
| | |
| | #27 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Canuk
Posts: 3,861
| Quote:
__________________ === PCIe HD1 Core Card - 192 Analog I/O Plus a Surplus Sale ![]() DONATE TO HAITI RELIEF TODAY | |
| | |
| | #28 |
| Lives for gear | Hi That was me telling you, in a round about way, that it doesn't work yet! ...so your test isn't really fair. It should come soon though... what it currently does is pretty pleasant! But not correct. Cheers! |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 278
| i may in the minority but i like the no comp version the best. |
| | |
| | #30 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: NYC
Posts: 11
| Just curious T_R_S, Looking at the pictures, the Duende threshold is just a notch below +20, while the Waves' threshold is just a notch below +15, though they're both at the same visual setting. Does this mean that the threshold for the Duende was +18 while the threshold on the Waves was at +14, and that makes for a difference in how the 2 plugs behave? Were all the plugs showing similar amounts of needle deflection (and is that even a measure you can't trust since that's modelled too?) Thanks, Greg |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Waves SSL and Duende SSL: both from the same company?! | Farshad | So much gear, so little time! | 33 | 12th October 2009 09:44 PM |
| CHRIS LORD-ALGE’S SSL SETTINGS NOW AVAILABLE AS PART OF WAVES’ SSL BUNDLE | The Press Desk at Gearslutz.com | New Product Alert! | 25 | 13th April 2008 12:32 PM |
| If SSL consoles are the Holy Grail, why aren't SSL channel strips | AlanTide | So much gear, so little time! | 39 | 9th April 2008 09:08 PM |
| Waves SSL vs SSL FX G384 vs URS 1980 - The advanced Test | theother | High end | 237 | 5th December 2006 09:59 AM |