Behringer X32 as Recording Interface? - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Music Computers

Behringer X32 as Recording Interface?
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 2nd September 2012   #1
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 529

Thread Starter
Behringer X32 as Recording Interface?

I have placed an order for an X32 to use primarily in a project studio. I am replacing an Echo Layla 3G and a bunch of low/mid level rack gear. I use Samplitude and mix ITB. So why buy a digital mixer if I mix ITB?

Solutions I was looking at prior to the X32 was an API A2D to improve quality of recordings, and get a punchier API sound. I was also considering a UA Apollo, for improved sound quality (subjective) and easy tracking effects. But then I looked at the biggest issues I face in my project studio.

The biggest time waster / buzz kill in my project studio is dealing with patching hardware for various recording scenarios. Because I track /reamp guitars in isolation with multi mics, I usually prefer to have some tracking effects to the monitors, EQ, compression, reverb. The problem is that once I change a configuration, or use the mic pre for a different source, if I want to go back, it will often require some physical cabling. Also, the analog EQ and compression settings are often changing.

In my experience, DAW plug-ins are not practical for guitar tracking because of potential latency and having to deal with plugin & track management in the DAW.

This leads to alot of extra BS I have to deal with when experimenting with sounds while tracking (mic placement, ets), and I like to work in an uncluttered space. The X32 with its built in effects, totally fits the bill here. It works as a giant virtual patch bay and gives ultimate flexibility in signal routing. This should solve all the physical and routing management issues I deal with. The X32 has a 7" TFT monitor built in and dedicated hardware controls for effects.

The OTHER draw of the X32 is that it has a Mackie Control built in. Eight faders can be used to control mix and program automation in the DAW. It has LED scribble strips to show the track names, and dedicated buttons for transport controls. This should help should I continue to mix ITB.

What about sound quality? I think it will be the same, maybe improved depending on the quality of the pres. The converters are equivalent/slightly better speked than the ones used in the Echo Layla 3G/Audiofire (115db dynamic range ). I know that internal architecture contributes to sound quality, so this is TBD, but it should be on par with what I have experienced, and I have had no complaints with the Echo.

Add to that the "Midas Designed" preamps. Not only are these pres supposed to be great, but the channel strips are completely programmable! I can save different configurations, and hear how different EQ/compression settings will sound WHILE TRACKING. This is something that the Apollo should do as well.

There are two other reasons I think the X32 will be great. One is that with 32/32 firewire IO, I can mix on the X32 and route back to samplitude for mastering effects. Or I could chose a hybrid approach, mixing on the X32 and also using it to program automation. And if I am playing with a band, I can use it for live mixing, it has enough inputs for everyone.

The apollo can handle virtual patchbay duties, and it should be higher quality sound, but I am not convinced that the UAD plugins are better than the ones in samplitude. And Moore's law is killing hardware like the UAD. Processor power nearly doubles every 18 months. Cards like the UAD were once necessary, now there is enough power to run these things native. I think its a bad time to get on board with UAD plugs.


The only concern I have about the X32 is that it doesnt have any digital inputs, which means at the moment, I cant use it with improved converters. (It does have AES output) It does use the Cirrus CS5368 and CS4385 converters which have similar specs as the ones in the Layla 3G, and I havent had any complaints with conversion quality. There is an expansion slot and rumors are that SPDIF/ADAT/Word clock will be added.

Hopefully it will ship soon and then I will truly know how useful it is for a project studio. I don't see this working in a professional context until/if they provide digital inputs and word clock.
SabreChris is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2012   #2
Lives for gear
 
dxavier's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2009
Location: London
Posts: 1,068

Will be interesting to see what you think of the X32 in the context of a studio. It looks very well made and well featured.

Hopefully, you will post a review of it?
dxavier is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2012   #3
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 529

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by dxavier View Post
Will be interesting to see what you think of the X32 in the context of a studio. It looks very well made and well featured.

Hopefully, you will post a review of it?
I purchased this a couple weeks ago and returned it for a few reasons.

The primary reason was self noise generated by the board.


*The rotary encoder would make a zipper noise.
*The more LEDs that were lit up in the EQ section would add more noise.
*Channels 16/32 (farthest to right) were picking up electrical noise from the board and are not usable.
*The headphone outputs had a faint electrical or transformer noise. (Not clear if this was audible on main outs or just the headphone jacks.)
*The overall sound quality conversion was poor IMO. I played an MP3 from computer usb through channels 1/2 and hd280 phones and it sounded boxy. Then I played same mp3 from my htc evo and it sounded better, more clear and open. (And these are just poor phone converters.) The channels 1/2 were soloed. Its not clear if this was bad board sound or just a poorly speced headphone amp, but in studio I am using phones alot, so it was a no go.
*Poor s/n in general. Channel with sm58 and vocal tests had more hiss that I would expect from a studio preamp.
*Even when gain set to zero on all input channels, they cumulatively added noise to signal path. Unused channels need to be muted. Used chanells need to be gated.
*Flaky drivers. WDM drivers were working for windows, but ASIO drivers were not interacting well with samplitude. In "clock selection" box there was gibberish, and then once selected it defaulted to "computer", not X32.
*ASIO driver control panel when launched from OS, does not allow changing any options. Can only change asio options when launched from Samp. Was not able to get samp to play w/ asio, X32 selected and samp playing, no sound. Ididnt spend too much time trying to troubleshoot because of other issues. At this point I knew it was going back.
*Inaccurate faders. They land in a different spot depending on which direction they are coming from.

I also checked the one at GC and noticed most of the same problems.

I posted this in the remote forum, the tech rep from Behringer PMed me and said there was a 5min fix for all the noise issues in the first batch, that they had to reroute a cable.

Overall, I would avoid this for studio work as I was left with the impression that you will get better recording/playback results with one of the newer $200-300 usb multichannel interfaces. Even without the noise, I felt it would be very easy to improve upon conversion and fidelity. For live sound this might be the ticket, but because of noise/manufacturing issues, I absolutely did not want one from the first batch. The feature set is amazing, but dont expect it to compete with even a mid level recording interface.
SabreChris is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2012   #4
Lives for gear
 
dxavier's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2009
Location: London
Posts: 1,068

OH NO. As usual, the Sound on Sound review, gave it platinum plated thumbs up but I was wondering if Berhinger sound quality and noise floor, had taken that much of a leap forward. The Midas connection, side blinded me into thinking it could be possible, but I was wrong. Another Berhinger product, where the guts don't match the looks and feature list.
dxavier is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2012   #5
Gear interested
 
Bratwurst's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 19

@SabreChris:
I do have a X32 and I did over 50 live gigs and three recording sessions with it.
I never ran in any of these problem you described. I recorded several live gigs with 32 tracks on a Acer One netbook with a ATOM CPU (!) over USB, hooked up my i7 studio PC over FiWi and run the whole session with 48 Samples. Even my 2011 Mac Book Pro with Studio One V2 runs flawless with 64 Samples.

The noise issue on channel 16&36 is known and there are in deed some of the early desks, where one signal cable has to be rerouted. You can do this even on your own, if you have some basic tech skills.

Concerning sound: Maybe look into the X32 thread in the soundforums.net
There are some audio samples from live and studio recordings. For me, the X32 sounds really nice and this goes for almost all users of a X32. Their comments on the soundquality across-the-board are very positive.

Before you give up on the board, maybe get a second one and try again. According to the Behringner Facebook site, they shipped already over 20.000 desks worldwide and therefore the are very little complains about faulty desks. Anyhow it is in deed annoying, when your own desks fails...
Bratwurst is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2012   #6
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 529

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bratwurst View Post
@SabreChris:
I do have a X32 and I did over 50 live gigs and three recording sessions with it.
I never ran in any of these problem you described. I recorded several live gigs with 32 tracks on a Acer One netbook with a ATOM CPU (!) over USB, hooked up my i7 studio PC over FiWi and run the whole session with 48 Samples. Even my 2011 Mac Book Pro with Studio One V2 runs flawless with 64 Samples.

The noise issue on channel 16&36 is known and there are in deed some of the early desks, where one signal cable has to be rerouted. You can do this even on your own, if you have some basic tech skills.

Concerning sound: Maybe look into the X32 thread in the soundforums.net
There are some audio samples from live and studio recordings. For me, the X32 sounds really nice and this goes for almost all users of a X32. Their comments on the soundquality across-the-board are very positive.

Before you give up on the board, maybe get a second one and try again. According to the Behringner Facebook site, they shipped already over 20.000 desks worldwide and therefore the are very little complains about faulty desks. Anyhow it is in deed annoying, when your own desks fails...
The one at the local GC was doing the same thing, and the behringer rep admitted the problem was with the first batch and needs a cable to be moved.

That aside, either the quality of the headphone amp or the board itself was not up to my standard, and it was not clear that the asio usb drivers were working well at this point. I exchanged it for an RME UFX.

My feeling is that they will address most of these issues over time and the board will improve. I will take a look again later. Perhaps the boards that the power users got their hands on were given ones with better QA.
SabreChris is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2012   #7
Lives for gear
 
DistortingJack's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Location: London/Paris
Posts: 677

Quote:
Originally Posted by SabreChris View Post
*The overall sound quality conversion was poor IMO. I played an MP3 from computer usb through channels 1/2 and hd280 phones and it sounded boxy. Then I played same mp3 from my htc evo and it sounded better, more clear and open. (And these are just poor phone converters.) The channels 1/2 were soloed. Its not clear if this was bad board sound or just a poorly speced headphone amp, but in studio I am using phones alot, so it was a no go.
I would just say this: do yourself a favour and swap those HD280 quickly! They're one of my pet peeves. Such a harsh, yet unfocussed sound, yuck. If you've got the money for a desk, you can afford some good 'phones!
DistortingJack is online now  
1
Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2012   #8
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 529

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by DistortingJack View Post
I would just say this: do yourself a favour and swap those HD280 quickly! They're one of my pet peeves. Such a harsh, yet unfocussed sound, yuck. If you've got the money for a desk, you can afford some good 'phones!
They're not my favorites but they have a standard 1/8" jack which can be plugged to my phone or adapted to 1/4". They were sufficient for the test.
SabreChris is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th September 2012   #9
Gear interested
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 4

Is there a way of knowing by Serial # if a board is from the "old batch" or new? I am considering purchasing one from the local GC, and did not want to get an early release board, I'd rather buy one that has been "fixed".
SimpleM is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th September 2012   #10
PDC
Lives for gear
 
PDC's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,890

Having customers and sales guys unable to reach Behringer tech support by phone for about four days now. Come on guys. Hire some people. Don't you know we have double digit unemployment in the USA and there are tons of musicians and techs in Vegas?
PDC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 4th October 2012   #11
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 5

Quote:
Originally Posted by SabreChris View Post
The only concern I have about the X32 is that it doesnt have any digital inputs, which means at the moment, I cant use it with improved converters. (It does have AES output)
The S16 digital snake has digital i/o (ADAT lightpipe). Granted, no word clock.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SabreChris View Post
*Channels 16/32 (farthest to right) were picking up electrical noise from the board and are not usable.
There's an acknowledged problem with internal cable routing on some boards that causes noise on these two channels. It's a quick fix that Behringer takes care of if you let them know. It's been discussed on the soundforums thread.
mystryda is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Insert point as direct out for multitrack recording deardaddy Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 44 5th May 2013 11:40 PM
as remote as you can get nomadic8 Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 11 28th March 2007 11:48 AM
anyone using SAW studio as a remote recording platform? cajonezzz Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 3 16th April 2006 05:06 AM
Laptop Firewire Recording Interface smoore98 Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 24 30th December 2005 01:59 PM
Recording Celtic Music (instrumental as well as Sean Nos) BattleAngel Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 10 28th April 2004 05:07 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:12 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.