Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Music computers


New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 22nd June 2006   #1
Lives for gear
 
Matthew Murray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,662

Thread Starter
Fireface 800 and External Firewire 800 HD?

Hi all. I'm using a FF800 as my interface, and I'm going to be running it right to the brim (spdif and 16 channels adat, all happening at once). I'm thinking I should probably connect it via firewire 800, but I've also got a firewire 800 hard drive which I use as my tracking HD.

Question is -- when I'm chaining the two units to my G5's only firewire 800 port, should it be the hard drive first, and then the FF800, or vice versa? Or does it even matter? Buying cables and I want to make sure I get proper lengths and all that.

Thanks :-)
__________________
-Matthew
Matthew Murray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd June 2006   #2
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Los Angeles/Detroit
Posts: 665

I think the FF only works when connected directly to the computer. So, that would mean you'd be connecting the drive to the FF.

Why not just connect your drive to one of your FW400 ports with a 800->400 FW cable?
Schmacko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd June 2006   #3
Lives for gear
 
Matthew Murray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,662

Thread Starter
I suppose I'd just like to get the most juice out of the hard drive too. But perhaps having it on the 400 bus would make things run smoother anyways.
Matthew Murray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd June 2006   #4
Moderator
 
DrDeltaM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,301

Even when using all I/O, there's no need for FW800.

For example, at 48kHz:
48000 x 24 bit = 1 152 000 bits = 144 000 bytes / sec for one input or output

The Fireface has a total of 56 inputs and outputs together, so:

56 x 144 000 bytes/sec = 8 064 000 bytes/sec = 7875kbyte/sec = 7,7 Mb/sec

FW400 is 400 megabits/sec = 50 Mb/sec

Headroom enough ;-)
__________________
Mathijs Indesteege aka Mathew Lane
mixing - mastering - audio restoration - plugins
http://www.mathewlane.com

DrMS. Focus on your stereo field. - NEW v3.2 OUT NOW!
DrMS spatial processor - native RTAS/AU/VST plugin ยป

Digital Audio Product Support
Joystick Audio - Benelux High End Distributor
http://www.joystick.be
DrDeltaM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd June 2006   #5
Lives for gear
 
Matthew Murray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,662

Thread Starter
Whoa. Is that math right? If so, I'm just going to keep the FF800 on FW400, and put the hard drive on FW800. Are you sure of your numbers, Mr. Delta? You're right then, that's more than enough headroom. :-)
Matthew Murray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd June 2006   #6
Moderator
 
DrDeltaM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,301

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matthew Murray
Whoa. Is that math right? If so, I'm just going to keep the FF800 on FW400, and put the hard drive on FW800. Are you sure of your numbers, Mr. Delta? You're right then, that's more than enough headroom. :-)
Yes, those numbers are correct
DrDeltaM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd June 2006   #7
Lives for gear
 
Matthew Murray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,662

Thread Starter
Thanks Doc.
Matthew Murray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd June 2006   #8
Gear maniac
 
Branislav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Belgrade
Posts: 283

Send a message via Skype™ to Branislav
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matthew Murray
Question is -- when I'm chaining the two units to my G5's only firewire 800 port, should it be the hard drive first, and then the FF800
If you connect it like this, you can use the drive even when FF800 is switched off, that's about the only advantage.

Branislav
Branislav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd June 2006   #9
Gear Head
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 53

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrDeltaM
Yes, those numbers are correct
I'm not so sure. FW isoc streams also contain a lot of data which is formatting data in addition to audio. It's not nearly as simple as your maths suggest. I'm not sure about the exact configuration of isoc transmitters on the FF, but assuming it is 2 transmitters of 14 channels in each direction, the required bandwidth at 48kHz would be approx:

each packet:
14 channels * 8 samples * 32 bits per sample (even for 24 bit audio) + 64 bits of CRC + 96 bits of header data = 3712 bits per packet

then

size of packet x 4 transmitters x 8000 packets per second

= approx 14.2 meg/second.
thomashenry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd June 2006   #10
Lives for gear
 
Matthew Murray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,662

Thread Starter
So wait, 14.2 meg/second for how many channels of audio? The full 56?
If so I'd say that still comes in under the 50 megs a second that firewire is...
Matthew Murray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd June 2006   #11
Moderator
 
DrDeltaM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,301

Quote:
Originally Posted by thomashenry
I'm not so sure. FW isoc streams also contain a lot of data which is formatting data in addition to audio. It's not nearly as simple as your maths suggest. I'm not sure about the exact configuration of isoc transmitters on the FF, but assuming it is 2 transmitters of 14 channels in each direction, the required bandwidth at 48kHz would be approx:

each packet:
14 channels * 8 samples * 32 bits per sample (even for 24 bit audio) + 64 bits of CRC + 96 bits of header data = 3712 bits per packet

then

size of packet x 4 transmitters x 8000 packets per second

= approx 14.2 meg/second.
Yes, I didn't take this into consideration, I was purely counting the audio data, not a tech guy to know all those firewire protocol details, my mistake :-) It's probably why some companies like MOTU choose to have their own format running of a firewire-type of connection.
DrDeltaM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd June 2006   #12
Gear maniac
 
SONICA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: BOSTON, MA
Posts: 192

Hi,

the only time you will need Firewire 800 is when using more than one Fireface 800.
When using one Fireface it will not use more than Firewire 400.

What you have to worry about is using a hard disk and the Fireface 800 on the same Firewire bus.

If possible run the Fireface 800 and the hard disk on two different Firewire controllers.


Best regards,

Guy Cefalu

Sonica Audio Labs
__________________
Regards,


Guy Cefalu

Sonica Audio Labs
SONICA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2006   #13
Lives for gear
 
insomnio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,209

Quote:
Originally Posted by SONICA
Hi,

the only time you will need Firewire 800 is when using more than one Fireface 800.
When using one Fireface it will not use more than Firewire 400.

What you have to worry about is using a hard disk and the Fireface 800 on the same Firewire bus.

If possible run the Fireface 800 and the hard disk on two different Firewire controllers.


Best regards,

Guy Cefalu

Sonica Audio Labs
Thanks for putting it so clear.

By the way, I own a Sonica-X...very nice.

________________
Insomnio
insomnio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2006   #14
Lives for gear
 
Matthew Murray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,662

Thread Starter
Yes indeed, thanks kindly for that. One fireface on the FW400 bus, and HD on the FW800 bus, is the route i'm going to take i think.

Thanks all for your input!
Matthew Murray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th June 2006   #15
Gear addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 494

Quote:
Originally Posted by SONICA
Hi,

the only time you will need Firewire 800 is when using more than one Fireface 800.
When using one Fireface it will not use more than Firewire 400.

What you have to worry about is using a hard disk and the Fireface 800 on the same Firewire bus.

If possible run the Fireface 800 and the hard disk on two different Firewire controllers.


Best regards,

Guy Cefalu

Sonica Audio Labs




not sure if this is true for 2 reasons:

1. on my 2.0 g5 i have 5-7 firewire 400 drives connected at the same time as my fireface 800. the trick to getting it work is that the ff800 has to be turned on first in order to grab the bus first.

2. on g5 (at least the older ones) the 800 and 400 bus are the same.

ej
ejsongs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2006   #16
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 4

Hi, Im new here, and I have to say the advice and info on these boards is fantastic..
On this subject, I found the FF to work best when running off its own bus, so Ive installed a LaCie FW 800 PCI, slot 4 on a G5, run my ext HDD's off that, FF running off the internal 400 all by its lonesome, as Im only using 1 FF.
ADino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2006   #17
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,127

fyi,
the g5's have had a lot of problems reported when using both the 400 and 800 bus's at the same time. i ran into hard drive corruption doing this and finally after alot of searching found out about this issue. i bought a lacie fw800 card and put my fireface on it and run my sample hard drive from a fw400 port. problem solved. i do all tracking to an internal sata drive which is blazing. i can get 16 channels recording adat with 20-30 tracks playing without and problems.
if its working for you then no problem. if your drives start acting weird then think about my suggestion. my symptoms were external hard drive that would just transfer data slower and slower over the course of days. i would repair drive with disk utility and then it would become corrupt again over the next days again.
quincyg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd July 2006   #18
Gear maniac
 
SONICA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: BOSTON, MA
Posts: 192

Quote:
Originally Posted by ejsongs
not sure if this is true for 2 reasons:

1. on my 2.0 g5 i have 5-7 firewire 400 drives connected at the same time as my fireface 800. the trick to getting it work is that the ff800 has to be turned on first in order to grab the bus first.

2. on g5 (at least the older ones) the 800 and 400 bus are the same.

ej

Hi,

not only is true but also a requirement stated in the Fireface 800 users guide.


Best regards,

Guy Cefalu

Sonica Audio Labs
SONICA is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
RME Fireface 400 vs. Fireface 800 heksu High end 10 23rd August 2006 03:42 PM
Fireface 800. Winey Low End Theory 63 17th July 2006 11:59 AM
Anyone external clocking a fireface 800? jazztone So much gear, so little time! 4 2nd July 2006 03:42 AM
Fireface 800 ryanwalters High end 16 10th June 2006 07:40 AM
Help with the Fireface 800 Sirocco So much gear, so little time! 9 6th April 2005 08:43 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:00 AM.

 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com Limited - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office: 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.