The effect of soloing a track into an FX bus? - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Music Computers

The effect of soloing a track into an FX bus?
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 16th June 2012   #1
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 306

Thread Starter
The effect of soloing a track into an FX bus?

Hi guys. Something just crossed my mind.

Say you have 4 tracks going into a master bus with a compressor on it.

You want to hear how track 1 is being compressed on its own. So you solo track 1.

I presume, that the compressor would now not be acting as it was before. Is this true? Or is solo treated differently than volume automation precisely for this reason? Would make sense to me.

Can't check right now but I seem to remember I'm right - when soloing tracks, gating on busses got messed up.

That's in Sonar. I presume it might vary from DAW to DAW? Is there a common method of doing what I wish?

Cheers
EtherealEntity is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2012   #2
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 306

Thread Starter
Bump
EtherealEntity is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2012   #3
Lives for gear
 
Pedantic Sound's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Location: NYC

In Pro Tools at least, assuming the AUX track is solo isolated, soloing one of the tracks going to the AUX should cause the compressor to respond normally, but only to that track. If that makers sense.
__________________
Jesse Flaitz - Production sound and audio post. Greater NYC area.
http://pedanticsound.net
“A cable is a source of potential trouble connecting two other sources of potential trouble.”
Pedantic Sound is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2012   #4
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 306

Thread Starter
If I'm understanding you right then you're agreeing with me - that it would be less compressed than it usually is, because there is less level going into the compressor.

I'd be surprised if there isn't a way to really hear what's going on, as I'm sure 90% of the time when we solo something it's for that reason and in my opinion it should behave as though you are automating the volume of all the other tracks down.
EtherealEntity is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2012   #5
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,148

I think you're overcomplicating things - if you solo and only send one track to the 2bus compressor, the compressor will only react to that sound, because that's all it can hear. There's really no point in soloing to hear what is just happening to one track in the context of 2 bus compression, because it's what's happening to all tracks as they glue/meld together under 2bus compression that's the whole point. Volume automation or soloing makes no difference to the 2 bus compressor - it's just a circuit reacting to what ever it can hear.
dr_Jezz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2012   #6
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 306

Thread Starter
Yeah - I totally understand that's not the context it's being used in. It does make sense to me.

I just thought it would make a lot more sense, when you solo something, to hear it as it is in the final mix. That just makes so much sense to me, and I feel that's how people would usually want to use that function - as opposed to automation and often muting which are 'musical' or part of the project. Of course not possible in an analogue domain or with a 'circuit' - I just presumed this may be the way DAWs were designed to work.
EtherealEntity is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2012   #7
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,148

no
dr_Jezz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2012   #8
Gear for Lives.
 
offki's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Location: Brighton UK
Posts: 2,738

Quote:
Originally Posted by EtherealEntity View Post
Yeah - I totally understand that's not the context it's being used in. It does make sense to me.

I just thought it would make a lot more sense, when you solo something, to hear it as it is in the final mix. That just makes so much sense to me, and I feel that's how people would usually want to use that function - as opposed to automation and often muting which are 'musical' or part of the project. Of course not possible in an analogue domain or with a 'circuit' - I just presumed this may be the way DAWs were designed to work.
You could do this if it was a send and the sends were prefader. You could probably get it to work in ableton, but it would be pointless.
offki is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
FX box for live vocal distortion/filtering juniorhifikit Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 9 19th January 2013 09:07 AM
samples - clipping of the voice itself, or is it my bad? danijel Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 4 18th April 2008 09:21 PM
Methods of tracking an MPC into Logic? Barilla Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 6 12th May 2007 09:41 AM
Live vocal chain - Singer controlling fx from onstage Meriphew Live Sound 5 16th February 2007 11:56 PM
What FX do you use between gtr and amp when recording? Dissdnt_penguin So many guitars, so little time! 19 29th January 2007 01:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:06 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.