Protools on Macbook is FAST FAST FAST - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Music computers


Protools on Macbook is FAST FAST FAST

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 6th June 2006   #1
Lives for gear
 
T_R_S's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Canuk
Posts: 5,278

Thread Starter
Thumbs up Protools on Macbook is FAST FAST FAST

I cannot believe how fast PT on a Macbook (Dual Core 2 Ghz with 2 GB a RAM )is ...

63 voices ( About 42 tracks) 18,000 edits playing on Level 2!!!!
No Consolidation needed on the edits!
Sessions launch so fast
And you can run more plug-ins on it too, compared to a Powerbook G4!
Too bad Auto tune, Pitch N Time and a bunch of others won't work on it!
But you can do basic editing without a hitch!
__________________
FB Page

==========

Surplus Sale
T_R_S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th June 2006   #2
Gear Head
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Portsmouth, United Kingdom
Posts: 40

Sounds great!

I'm looking at swapping my current setup for a Mac laptop with ProTools as I'm mainly recording in studios but editing at home.

Is that a Macbook not a Macbook Pro?

Also, I'm interested to find out what interface you're using and what bit depth/rate you use.

Thanks!

David
Devs1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2006   #3
Lives for gear
 
T_R_S's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Canuk
Posts: 5,278

Thread Starter
24 Bit 44.1 on a MBox 2 - Macbook (Not a Pro)
T_R_S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2006   #4
Lives for gear
 
AdamJay's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 2,825

the intel port of LE is indeed fast.

my macbook pro (2ghz dual core as well) doesn't even crack 40% CPU.
running 160 plug-ins (32 tracks, each with mono BF76, Digirack Eq3 7band, Limiter, Delay, Gate)
24bit, 44.1khz, Digi 002 Rack. 512 samples.


i love it.
__________________
AdamJay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2006   #5
Gear nut
 
Diskordia's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: MN
Posts: 106

how does the macbook compare to the midrange G5s? the above stats are very impressive...

it would be cool to have alll the mixing power you need in a laptop. mixing on my powerbook can be pretty depressing these days
Diskordia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2006   #6
Lives for gear
 
Henchman's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: LA, USA
Posts: 6,836

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diskordia
it would be cool to have alll the mixing power you need in a laptop. mixing on my powerbook can be pretty depressing these days
I've been using my 1k laptop for mixing the last year and a half.
Henchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2006   #7
Lives for gear
 
gsilbers's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: El Pueblo de Nuestra Senora La Reina de Los Angeles de Porciuncula
Posts: 3,622

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diskordia
how does the macbook compare to the midrange G5s? the above stats are very impressive...

it would be cool to have alll the mixing power you need in a laptop. mixing on my powerbook can be pretty depressing these days
theres tons of benchmarks tests around the web. basically a macintel is as powerfull as a powermac g5 dual 2.0 and even more so. its based on running tons of instances of the same plugin like reverbs w long tails etc. also rendering time in final cut pro.

damn i have a g5!!!
gsilbers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2006   #8
Lives for gear
 
T_R_S's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Canuk
Posts: 5,278

Thread Starter
Now imagine a Dual Dual Core PCIe - I am thinking my days of my 7 card system are coming to a close ...
T_R_S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2006   #9
Lives for gear
 
Henchman's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: LA, USA
Posts: 6,836

Quote:
Originally Posted by T_R_S
Now imagine a Dual Dual Core PCIe - I am thinking my days of my 7 card system are coimg to a close ...
And with a Duende and/or Focusrite liquid mix.
For sure no need for ANY cards at all.
And way more portable too.
Henchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2006   #10
Lives for gear
 
T_R_S's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Canuk
Posts: 5,278

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henchman
And with a Duende and/or Focusrite liquid mix.
For sure no need for ANY cards at all.
And way more portable too.
No cards??? 192 tracks/ADC/160 channels of I/O in LE maybe a bit down the road.
T_R_S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2006   #11
Lives for gear
 
gsilbers's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: El Pueblo de Nuestra Senora La Reina de Los Angeles de Porciuncula
Posts: 3,622

thumbsup logic on a macintel mixing tons tons of track, maybe while drinkin a mocafrapulatte at starbucks or on a plane trip. too bad PT LE only allows upto (46 track i think) certain amount of tracks. maybe with one of the toolkits upgrade it can go up to
96 tracks.

bye bye HD.
gsilbers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2006   #12
Lives for gear
 
blackcatdigi's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: upstate, sc
Posts: 1,739

Quote:
Originally Posted by T_R_S
No cards??? 192 tracks/ADC/160 channels of I/O in LE maybe a bit down the road.
Exactly.

I don't really see Avid letting that particular "cat" outta the bag anytime soon.

Glad to hear the port is fast. Would be cool for offline editing with a M-Audio Transit...

__________________
Sincerely,

Casey
SC Digital Services

Bob Olhsson wrote on 17th September 2002, 12:56 PM:
"Music is being used to sort consumers rather than to entertain people."
blackcatdigi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th June 2006   #13
Lives for gear
 
jindrich's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Location: Palma+Stuttgart
Posts: 1,599

hey guys, those of you having a macintel laptop, can you test how long can it go in terms of latency?
I mean, what's the smallest buffer it tolerates without going bezzz, in a session with a reasonable bunch of tracks.

I'm mostly interested in such a test to find out how useful they are as a (remote) tracking device, WITH software monitoring enabled

thx in advance
jindrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th June 2006   #14
Lives for gear
 
ersheff's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 507

Quote:
Originally Posted by Henchman
I've been using my 1k laptop for mixing the last year and a half.
Now mac users will be able to do that, too.
FINALLY...
You know, I bought my imac G5 literally DAYS before the Intel announcement. Had I known about the switch, I could have probably tolerated working on my B&W G3 (perhaps upgrading it with a G4 ZIF card) for another year and snagged one of these macbooks now... Oh well. Live and learn.
ersheff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th June 2006   #15
Gear nut
 
SushiConQueso's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Location: OC/LA
Posts: 99

Send a message via AIM to SushiConQueso
and I conveniently am selling the 1.83's new in box for a now lowered $1600. yeehaw!
__________________
no music, no life
www.myspace.com/goodmusicproject
SushiConQueso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th June 2006   #16
Gear nut
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: Valley Village, CA
Posts: 80

Send a message via AIM to Gm7Cadd9
For the record, I am running PT LE 7.1.1 on my intel iMac... I have been beta testing it for some time now, and I love it! The only real dilemma is that I have to use Waves on an old G4... the intel can handle all the plugs, but most of them aren't ready yet!

Anyhow, I am beta testing for Pitch 'n Time Pro and Pitch 'n Time LE, both of which have no problems that I can see. Changing tempo and pitch up to 800% all in a few seconds! Good Stuff... I am dying waiting for Waves though, PT was a free update, Reason was a free update, I'd be willing to bet that Waves waits for the new WUP quarter and charges a healthy $300 any takers?

-Roy
Gm7Cadd9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th June 2006   #17
Gear nut
 
duende's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 135

Send a message via AIM to duende
32 tracks (or damn close) at 96k on a dual 2.16... with lots of edits and a few verbs and 10 or so compressors.

CPU reading at 40 to 50%.


With all this processing power, my "editing" machine now has some serious plug-in processing capabilities. Unfortunately (or fortunately), I don't personally own many plugs.
duende is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2006   #18
Gear nut
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 81

Quote:
Originally Posted by T_R_S
I cannot believe how fast PT on a Macbook (Dual Core 2 Ghz with 2 GB a RAM )is ...

63 voices ( About 42 tracks) 18,000 edits playing on Level 2!!!!
No Consolidation needed on the edits!
Sessions launch so fast
And you can run more plug-ins on it too, compared to a Powerbook G4!
Too bad Auto tune, Pitch N Time and a bunch of others won't work on it!
But you can do basic editing without a hitch!



Do you find the screen size 13" to small for serious audio editing?

Which softsynths have u used succesfully? I'm still kinda skeptical cuz this has not been Digi Approved.......only the Macbook Pro's have.
__________________
P4 2.6 Ghz
Mac G4
Pro tools/Cubase sx
crew14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th June 2006   #19
Lives for gear
 
jindrich's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Location: Palma+Stuttgart
Posts: 1,599

hey, can you set the buffer to its smallest setting -64samples, when you do not notice latency anymore- and report back on how far in terms of tracks and plugs the macintels go? thx
jindrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th June 2006   #20
Lives for gear
 
T_R_S's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Canuk
Posts: 5,278

Thread Starter
1280 X 800 Wide Screen Great for editing.


I have not used any soiftsyths it is just and editor for now AFIK only Hybrid & Xpand work for now.

Smallest Latency setting 256 Samples (I think that's what any LE system will do ???)

It has the same processor as a Macbook Pro So I can't see why Digi will not qualify it. It's only been out for a month so it will take some time to get the official seal of approval.
T_R_S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th June 2006   #21
Lives for gear
 
AlexLakis's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD/Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,631

Quote:
Originally Posted by T_R_S
Smallest Latency setting 256 Samples (I think that's what any LE system will do ???)
My LE system records 12 tracks with plugins at 64 samples. Probably more, but I haven't tried it. Congrats on the Macbook, they look pretty cool!
AlexLakis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th June 2006   #22
Gear nut
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 81

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexLakis
My LE system records 12 tracks with plugins at 64 samples. Probably more, but I haven't tried it. Congrats on the Macbook, they look pretty cool!

Wow, that's pretty good, could u please post your computer system specs?

I'm curious!
crew14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th June 2006   #23
Lives for gear
 
AlexLakis's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD/Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,631

Sure! The specs for that system are:

A8V motherboard (not deluxe or anything, just the regular one)
AMD x2 4400+ processor
2 GB Corsair XMS (2x1024)
Matrox G550 AGP video card
Pyro 64 PCI firewire card (from Digi's recommended list)
Enermax 450W power supply

That's about it. Running it on XP Pro SP2. I was running 2 UAD-1 cards at one point (couldn't run 3,) but it proved to be a little unstable.

Shouldn't be an issue with my new quad, tho...
AlexLakis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd June 2008   #24
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1

Macbook with Pro tools

I was using a PC to run protools and I thought that a macbook would be better, so I bought a macbook with 80 Gb and I'm using my lacie hardrive to save all the files. But I cannot play one full song and the mac stops saying that it is too much information to be processed and tells me to change the H/W for a higher number. Is there any configuration that I'm missing ?

Thanks Alex

Quote:
Originally Posted by T_R_S View Post
I cannot believe how fast PT on a Macbook (Dual Core 2 Ghz with 2 GB a RAM )is ...

63 voices ( About 42 tracks) 18,000 edits playing on Level 2!!!!
No Consolidation needed on the edits!
Sessions launch so fast
And you can run more plug-ins on it too, compared to a Powerbook G4!
Too bad Auto tune, Pitch N Time and a bunch of others won't work on it!
But you can do basic editing without a hitch!
alexpuglia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd June 2008   #25
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,228

Quote:
Originally Posted by T_R_S View Post
No cards??? 192 tracks/ADC/160 channels of I/O in LE maybe a bit down the road.
Just out of curiosity, when was the last time you had to use 160 i/o´s ?
Fredrik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd June 2008   #26
Gear addict
 
rasmus's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Hamburg/Germany
Posts: 367

bought a mbox micro to get used to pt... and it sux!
i get double the plug count at half the latency, running cubase and my ensemble, this is on a first gen macbook.
must be something wrong with the mbox drivers, had some serious crashes since i installed it... going to sell it
rasmus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd June 2008   #27
Lives for gear
 
PlatinumSamples's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,759

Quote:
Originally Posted by T_R_S View Post
Too bad Auto tune, Pitch N Time and a bunch of others won't work on it!
Sounds like you need to update your plug-ins -- those work fine on Intel Macs.

Rail
__________________
Platinum Samples
www.platinumsamples.com
Platinum Samples on Facebook
===========================
PlatinumSamples is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd June 2008   #28
Lives for gear
 
T_R_S's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Canuk
Posts: 5,278

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fredrik View Post
Just out of curiosity, when was the last time you had to use 160 i/o´s ?
About an hour ago my HD system has dedicated I/O for all my outboard (No Patchbay needed)

Rail this thread is from 2006 I believe at that time PnT and A.tune were not Intel of course they are now.
T_R_S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th June 2008   #29
Lives for gear
 
PlatinumSamples's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,759

Quote:
Originally Posted by T_R_S View Post
Rail this thread is from 2006 I believe at that time PnT and A.tune were not Intel of course they are now.
Crikey - sorry, didn't even look at the date.

Cheers,

Rail
PlatinumSamples is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th June 2008   #30
Lives for gear
 
jeronimo's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 3,228

Send a message via ICQ to jeronimo Send a message via AIM to jeronimo
I had very little experience with a M-box on my macbook, and I must say it was not good experience.
I'm curious about what PT and OS version are you guys using.
__________________
Think Diferente!
http://www.jeracravo.com
jeronimo is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
What's Up with Ceilings? (Need help fast!) timtoonz So much gear, so little time! 5 18th May 2006 01:22 AM
Guitar help FAST !!! loke Work In Progress / Advice Requested / Show & Tell / Artist Showcase / Mix-Offs 1 5th July 2004 11:32 AM
I need help FAST, in 2h it´s to late !!!!! loke So much gear, so little time! 8 8th January 2004 07:48 PM
Need help, fast! Mats Olsson Music computers 4 20th November 2003 10:10 AM
Fast triggers Ricoyeh So much gear, so little time! 2 21st October 2003 07:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:17 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.