Quantizing guitars in Logic - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Music Computers

Quantizing guitars in Logic
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 1st May 2012   #1
Lives for gear
 
Joined: May 2010
Location: London
Posts: 832

Thread Starter
Quantizing guitars in Logic

I'm aware of the flex editor and use it but when I'm playing 16th or 8th notes and in a rush to get a few layers of guitar recorded, I wish there was a way to quantise the notes automatically like I can with midi so the transients snap to 1/8 or 1/16th.

Am I missing something here? Seems strange to have such a great feature in Logic but not be able to snap them to the grid.
Amber is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st May 2012   #2
Gear Guru
 
theblue1's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 17,401

I'll skip the obligatory practice more.

Have you considered simply creating a set of samples for the song? By doing that you can control their placement on the timeline with great precision -- whereas trying to use robots to 'sense' where each hit's temporal center is is a bit of a clusterfudge, since varying transients tend to 'fool' the robots.
__________________

day job | music and social stuff | mutant pop on facebook | roots acoustic on facebook | A Year of Songs


The chorus is a little weak... I think it needs more lasers.
theblue1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st May 2012   #3
Lives for gear
 
Joined: May 2010
Location: London
Posts: 832

Thread Starter
I have thought of that but I'd probably spend so much time nudging regions to get the transients to be on the grid.

I do need to practice more, 18 years playing guitar and timing has always been a weakness.
Amber is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st May 2012   #4
Gear addict
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 477

Do you own a metronome?
jasonwagner is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st May 2012   #5
Lives for gear
 
Joined: May 2010
Location: London
Posts: 832

Thread Starter
No but when I get chance (I'm usually writing/recording music 8 hours a day) I do playing to the click in Logic.
Amber is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st May 2012   #6
Gear addict
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 477

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amber View Post
No but when I get chance (I'm usually writing/recording music 8 hours a day) I do playing to the click in Logic.
Well that is damn awesome!!

I have found nothing replaces sitting down and running your parts with a click/metronome for timing. Not playing with a drum beat, just a single tick, tick, tick. You have to train your muscle memory to feel what it's like to be right on time or right off if you choose, and only hours with a solid click will do that. At least in my experience.
jasonwagner is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st May 2012   #7
Gear nut
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 136

You can absolutely do exactly what you are asking about. Read up on quantising audio in the manual. It's pretty straight forward.
F.M. is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st May 2012   #8
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,645

Melodyne can quantize Audio
Manfrensengensen is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st May 2012   #9
Lives for gear
 
RARStudios's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,179

Flex time. Polyphonic. Click below the wave form. Nudge, quantize, etc.
RARStudios is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st May 2012   #10
Gear addict
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 477

Or monophonic if it's just single note runs, I believe that would be a better choice.
jasonwagner is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st May 2012   #11
Lives for gear
 
Mr.HOLMES's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,371

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amber View Post
No but when I get chance (I'm usually writing/recording music 8 hours a day) I do playing to the click in Logic.
From one player to the next quantizing always = artifacts.
And this sounds awful to my ear.


So in Logic is a metronome so you have to practice more thats it- it also helps your ear to identify rhythms much better... so you only win with training.
Mr.HOLMES is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st May 2012   #12
Gear Head
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 49

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amber View Post
I do need to practice more, 18 years playing guitar and timing has always been a weakness.

nsilva is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2012   #13
Gear Guru
 
theblue1's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 17,401

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amber View Post
I have thought of that but I'd probably spend so much time nudging regions to get the transients to be on the grid.

I do need to practice more, 18 years playing guitar and timing has always been a weakness.


I know I could always stand to play more -- or at least play smarter.
theblue1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2012   #14
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Intight
Posts: 2,060

18 years?
Maybe guitar is not your instrument.
Quantized guitar sounds awfull.
Quantizing drums also sounds awfull.
There,i said it.
cavern is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2012   #15
Lives for gear
 
Mr.HOLMES's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,371

I know players which play longer as 18 yrs and their timing is awful just because they are lazy... Tracking in logic really made my timing tight. And yes it was quite a few years 6 years recording here and there every day - it hammers the klick in your brain.

It also gives you the freedom of varying the time if it needs to vary- you get a better feeling for swing-feel because your brain knows what tight timing means... and how a more free timing should flow.

Just train it every day for a few 10-20 minuets and you fast see results that your tracking is getting better an better. Start at lower BPMs such as 75 go up two BPM after 2 days and see where you can get after 2 moths go back a few BPMs or start to play eights.....

Buy the book - guitar discipline....it like timing drills..
Mr.HOLMES is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2012   #16
Harmless Wacko
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: A prison cell with soffit mounts
Posts: 1,734

Enhance timing plug.

Or yer gonna hafta sweat it out in Flex or something like Melodyne.

BOTH of which are fraught with artifacts... sometimes in places you wouldn't suspect would be problematic.

Bottom line. Either spend the time in tracking getting tight performances or yer doing in mix.

End of story.

Still no free lunch.

Which is great and as it should be.

SM.
__________________
“No plan survives contact with the enemy”
:Erwin Rommel
Slipperman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2012   #17
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 177

In the sample editor window hit factory than quantize engine. You milage may vary.
louis.lbnc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2012   #18
Lives for gear
 
DSpec1's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 551

Quote:
Originally Posted by cavern View Post
18 years?
Maybe guitar is not your instrument.
Quantized guitar sounds awfull.
Quantizing drums also sounds awfull.
There,i said it.
There is a chance that this individual is highly proficient but has become timing challenged due to playing alone. One gets lazy playing by oneself.
DSpec1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2012   #19
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Intight
Posts: 2,060

Quote:
Originally Posted by DSpec1 View Post
There is a chance that this individual is highly proficient but has become timing challenged due to playing alone. One gets lazy playing by oneself.
Anything's possible.
cavern is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2012   #20
Lives for gear
 
Zyzygis's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 863

Quote:
Originally Posted by cavern View Post
Anything's possible.
possibly
Zyzygis is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2012   #21
Gear nut
 
JohnnyFoster's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: Ashland, OR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.HOLMES View Post
I know players which play longer as 18 yrs and their timing is awful just because they are lazy... Tracking in logic really made my timing tight. And yes it was quite a few years 6 years recording here and there every day - it hammers the klick in your brain.

It also gives you the freedom of varying the time if it needs to vary- you get a better feeling for swing-feel because your brain knows what tight timing means... and how a more free timing should flow.

Just train it every day for a few 10-20 minuets and you fast see results that your tracking is getting better an better. Start at lower BPMs such as 75 go up two BPM after 2 days and see where you can get after 2 moths go back a few BPMs or start to play eights.....

Buy the book - guitar discipline....it like timing drills..
I agree with this ; before doing the amount of playing to a click as I have been in Logic ( and now in Cubase ) daily for the past 7 years, I was notorious for "rushing" when playing live. Now, my time is amazingly "on", and find myself quantizing less and less ( I'm a keyboardist ). It's fun to see just how on the beat I can now play, thanks to the daily "click" practice in Logic/Cubase.

Give it a try for a long while, and I'll bet your time improves magically.
JohnnyFoster is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2012   #22
Lives for gear
 
Joined: May 2010
Location: London
Posts: 832

Thread Starter
Most of the music I'm commisioned to do doesn't have guitars, so for the last 4 years, I've just spent so much time playing piano, strings, ambient background music etc. But I've been given a whole soundtrack to do which is all anthemic rock type stuff.

The biggest problem I have with timing is playing continuous notes that are meant to be right on the click.

I've found no problems with flextime, since I adjust the raw clean guitar audio before I put it through an amp simp.

I think I'll check out Melodyne and get into a practice routine when all this work is out the way.
Amber is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2012   #23
Lives for gear
 
pinkheadedbug's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 941

Usually with quanitizing guitar there's no need to quantize the whole thing. Just fix the worst offenders, and the rest usually fall more or less into place. Also, before you go flexing around, try shifting the entire track backwards or fowards to bring it closer to being on the beat. Many players have good steady timing but play a bit ahead or behind the beat. You can really tighten a track up by doing this without losing any quality. It may change the feel slightly, which might be a good or a bad thing.

(My playing is generally about 20ms ahead of the beat, for example)
pinkheadedbug is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2012   #24
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 186

The time it takes to edit your take into place will often surpass the time it takes to just record a better take.
kim olesen is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2012   #25
Lives for gear
 
NYCruiser's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Location: Yonkers, NY
Posts: 1,391

Just make a groove template out of the guitar transients and quantize the metronome to match it!
__________________
PapaPugs Studio
Yonkers, NY
NYCruiser is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2012   #26
Gear Head
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 59

Just a reminder that when using Flex in Logic, to use Polyphonic and make sure you tick the "complex" option..no artifacts (that I can hear anyway)
__________________
www.antonvann.co.uk
malawk is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2012   #27
Geariophile
 
Karloff70's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: london
Posts: 9,616

Flextime on, choose 'Slicing', go into the part to check the flex markers have ended up where you want them (+/- for more/less), come out, quantize like midi to your hearts content.

And then marvel at the spastic plastic coming from your speakers.
Karloff70 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 3rd May 2012   #28
Lives for gear
 
Joined: May 2010
Location: London
Posts: 832

Thread Starter
Just realised I can use the quantize in the top left corner to get great results on polyphonic with the complex box ticked. Anything else and I'm hearing artifacts. This'll save me a lot of time with those Edge and Snow Patrol type 16th notes layered in tracks.
Amber is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Syncing Sequenced Sounds In Protools STARSKI Music Computers 0 18th December 2007 04:52 PM
How good are EVB3, EP88, & Guitar Amp? initialsBB Music Computers 16 21st October 2007 07:39 PM
Multitrack Beat Slicer & Quantizer (PC) luctellier Music Computers 0 8th January 2007 08:54 PM
Managing takes in Logic Jimbo Music Computers 3 12th December 2006 01:42 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:52 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.