Login / Register
 
Steinberg UR824 vs. Presonus 1818VSL vs. Tascam US-2000 vs.
New Reply
Subscribe
Doctor Rockter
Thread Starter
#1
1st May 2012
Old 1st May 2012
  #1
Gear maniac
 
Doctor Rockter's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: Euskirchen, Germany
Posts: 195

Thread Starter
Doctor Rockter is offline
Steinberg UR824 vs. Presonus 1818VSL vs. Tascam US-2000 vs.

Hello friends,

I am in the market for a good USB-Audiointerface for live-recordings.
So far I have following units on my list:

Steinberg UR824
Presonus 1818VSL
Tascam US-2000


All of them come with recording software and enough mic-inputs for my needs. Mixing and mastering will be done in my studio in ProTools, anyway. So I guess any of these recording softwares (Cubase AI, Cubase LE or StudioOne) will be good enough for capturing the performances.

Well... so far, so good... Do you have any recommendations or experiences to share??

Thank you very much and take care,
Sascha
__________________
"Music is a higher revelation than all wisdom and philosophy..."

[Ludwig van Beethoven]
Quote
1
Doctor Rockter
Thread Starter
#2
1st May 2012
Old 1st May 2012
  #2
Gear maniac
 
Doctor Rockter's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: Euskirchen, Germany
Posts: 195

Thread Starter
Doctor Rockter is offline
Any thoughts?
Doctor Rockter
Thread Starter
#3
7th May 2012
Old 7th May 2012
  #3
Gear maniac
 
Doctor Rockter's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: Euskirchen, Germany
Posts: 195

Thread Starter
Doctor Rockter is offline
Who is willing to help me on this one??
#4
7th May 2012
Old 7th May 2012
  #4
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 166

mando1 is online now
I would take ur824 better preamps and conversion...
Doctor Rockter
Thread Starter
#5
7th May 2012
Old 7th May 2012
  #5
Gear maniac
 
Doctor Rockter's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: Euskirchen, Germany
Posts: 195

Thread Starter
Doctor Rockter is offline
Thank you very much!

That's exactly what I expected so far.
#6
7th May 2012
Old 7th May 2012
  #6
Gear maniac
 
Matthew Presley's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Austin
Posts: 201

Matthew Presley is offline
another vote for the UR824.

I had both units for a week for listening tests. The UR824 sounded better all around.
Quote
1
#7
7th May 2012
Old 7th May 2012
  #7
Gear maniac
 
mmahan40's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: BOSTON
Posts: 255

mmahan40 is offline
Liking my UR824

Sold my fireface uc and picked it up, very pleased especially considering the price.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by charlieclouser View Post
In 20 years I doubt the Chemical Bros will be in Carlsbad CA with 7,000+ posts on GS...
http://soundcloud.com/trakzilla/coast-to-coast-ft-kasirocswell
http://soundcloud.com/acestramental/reminisce-master1
#8
9th May 2012
Old 9th May 2012
  #8
Gear interested
 
Earfonia's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2

Earfonia is offline
I have UR824. Also had experience with Focusrite Pro 10 I/O and PreSonus FireStudio. I prefer UR824 between the 3.

What I like from UR824:
Clean and smooth sound.
Stable driver and mixing panel, not like the PreSonus, the mixing panel is very unstable.
Very easy to use and to understand the mixing panel (dspMixFx), not like the Focusrite, which is very confusing for the first time.
Like the PreSonus, can be used as stand alone mixer without PC. UR824 memorizes the last setting, so the next time I turn in on without PC, it function as stand alone mixer.
Good build hardware, all the knobs have the same feel, not too loose or too hard. Some interface doesn't have the same feel for all the knobs, that make them feel cheap.
2 independent headphone outputs (even though they are not loud enough for high impedance headphones).
And of course, the excellent DSP, EQ and Compressor for 8 input channels, and Reverb.

But so far, I didn't managed to use the VST plugins, RevX, and the sweet morph channel strip, with Reaper. They are not shown in Reaper fx browser, even though I have added the Steinberg folder in the VST setting. Those plugins only work in Cubase. Not sure why, still troubleshooting.

One thing need improvement is the headphone output, the gain is too low for 600 ohm studio headphones. My DT880 is not loud enough on UR824. I have to use the low impedance headphones, like my Shure SRH840.

Hope it helps
Quote
1
Doctor Rockter
Thread Starter
#9
10th May 2012
Old 10th May 2012
  #9
Gear maniac
 
Doctor Rockter's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: Euskirchen, Germany
Posts: 195

Thread Starter
Doctor Rockter is offline
Ok so I will definitely go for the UR 824.. a clear win as it seems..
Thanks so far friends!
Quote
1
#10
21st December 2012
Old 21st December 2012
  #10
Gear addict
 
weezul's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Newcastle Upon-Tyne
Posts: 448

weezul is offline
Just incase anyone comes back here... run away from the 1818VSL as fast as you can. It is plagued with clicks and pops at every buffer level, windows and mac... It's just shoddy and has caused me headaches every step of the way. I'm going to purchase a UR828 next and then use the 1818VSL pres over ADAT. I had a M-Audio ProFire2626 before this, and I got rid of it becasue of the firewire bus being a nightmare with pro tools. If the UR824 isn't stable I might just hang myself instead. The pres on the VSL are also not as nice as the M-Audio, and the gain pots are very odd, there's too much increase towards the second half of the pot, and the levels in the headphone mixer app... my god they are just some sort of weird scale which makes it impossible to judge. Okay rant over, merry christmas.

How are you finding the UR824 mate?
__________________
http://www.liamgaughan.com
#11
16th June 2013
Old 16th June 2013
  #11
Gear nut
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 146

rotundness is offline
Just wondering how you guys are getting on with the UR824?

New interface time and it looks almost too good to be true for the price,
especially with the $200.00 rebate they are offering right now.

I run Nuendo 5.55 on Windows 7.
i7 3770k

How does it handle 24 track recording at 24bit/48khz?
Can I count on that tiny usb port?
I'll be doing work at 88Khz and 96Khz too but
I wont need to record more then 8 sources at once.
How is the response time?
I mean I've heard that usb interfaces can seem
sluggish or something compared to PCI/PCIe interfaces.
I'm coming from an RME digi9652, old but still fast and stable.

Thanks for any info you are willing to share.
Quote
1
#12
16th June 2013
Old 16th June 2013
  #12
Lives for gear
 
norbury brook's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: London
Posts: 1,765

norbury brook is offline
If you're a nuendo user already the UR is a no brainer. I've record lots of shows with mine into my HP elitebook 24/48 24 tracks no problems at all.

Also the included VST versions of rev-x are worth a couple of hundred dollars in their own right I'd say just as plugins, they're fantastic.


MC
Quote
2
#13
16th June 2013
Old 16th June 2013
  #13
Gear nut
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 146

rotundness is offline
Quote:
If you're a nuendo user already the UR is a no brainer. I've record lots of shows with mine into my HP elitebook 24/48 24 tracks no problems at all.

Also the included VST versions of rev-x are worth a couple of hundred dollars in their own right I'd say just as plugins, they're fantastic.


MC

Thanks for taking the time to post. This is encouraging news.
Quote
1
New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn  Submit Thread to Google+ Google+ 
 
Topic:
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter / Forum
Replies
pianodano / So much gear, so little time!
0
against88 / Geekslutz forum
1
sideshowluke / So much gear, so little time!
0
charlienyc / Geekslutz forum
0
Doublehelix / So much gear, so little time!
8

Forum Jump

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.