Cubase 6.5 sounds much better than Cubase 6!
Old 29th February 2012
  #1
Lives for gear
 
UnderTow's Avatar
 

Thread Starter
Cubase 6.5 sounds much better than Cubase 6!

Made you look.

Alistair
Old 29th February 2012
  #2
Gear addict
 
samicide's Avatar
 

lmao
Old 29th February 2012
  #3
Lives for gear
 
Cover'd's Avatar
Fanboi

Prove it

Null test

Ignorant

Mac or PC

etc

etc

etc



Old 29th February 2012
  #4
Lives for gear
 

someone had to do it! might as well get it out of the way..
Old 29th February 2012
  #5
Gear nut
 
Tone Grown's Avatar
 

made me look out of disbelief... haha
Old 29th February 2012
  #6
Lives for gear
 
DAW PLUS's Avatar
I'm glad I saw who was the OP. I almost started yelling on GS for the first time...

PS: AListair, PM me your city, just curious.
Old 1st March 2012
  #7
Lives for gear
 
Ivorydom's Avatar
 

Sorry but can you be a bit more specific?
In what respect does it sound "better"?
Do you found the sound "warmer"?
Maybe it sounds more "analog"?
Can you do a null test???








Old 1st March 2012
  #8
Lives for gear
 
UnderTow's Avatar
 

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivorydom View Post
Sorry but can you be a bit more specific?
In what respect does it sound "better"?
Do you found the sound "warmer"?
Maybe it sounds more "analog"?
More depth! More engaging! Smoother highs! Deeper lows! More analogue! Warmer! More high-rez! More bloom! More authority! More 3D!

It is night and day maaan!

Quote:
Can you do a null test??
Oh go away with your nerd talk. If you can't hear the difference you must be deaf! :-p

Alistair
Old 1st March 2012
  #9
Gear maniac
 

"6.5 intrinsically sounds better than 6, why?"

Old 1st March 2012
  #10
Banned
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcus909 View Post
"6.5 intrinsically sounds better than 6, why?"

probably because 6 sounds better than most other daw´s..and in the moment he got that finaly he got nervous itch and had to make a joke?
Old 1st March 2012
  #11
Surrounded By Music
 
HDJK's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnderTow View Post
More depth! More engaging! Smoother highs! Deeper lows! More analogue! Warmer! More high-rez! More bloom! More authority! More 3D!

It is night and day maaan!
Ah soot, I'll have to dump Nuendo 5 and get Cubase 6.5 then
Old 1st March 2012
  #12
Gear addict
 
Sudad G's Avatar
 

But why should Cubase 6.5 sounds different to Cubase 6 ???

Steinberg itself have said, that the new things in Cubase 6.5 are two new VST-synths (Retrologue and Padshop), an updated audio quantize function (audio warp is integrated in quantize menue), soundcloud export, new Amp-rack presets, some new file format support - but they said nothing about a new audio engine or higher headroom or something like that.

Ok - we will see - anyway I will be at "Frankfurt Musik Messe 2012" and ask them.
They should know what they have changed.

Sudad G
Old 1st March 2012
  #13
Gear maniac
 
kai handberg's Avatar
 

haha you actually provoked a small growl from me!
Old 1st March 2012
  #14
Lives for gear
 
Jose's Avatar
 

I guess it sounds 0,05% better.
Old 1st March 2012
  #15
kdp
Lives for gear
 

But is it "Sonically better and faster"?
Old 1st March 2012
  #16
Gear addict
It does indeed.

I compared a song I mixed on Cubase 6 with a song that Andy Wallace mixed on Cubase 6.5, and the song mixed on Cubase 6.5 sounded significantly better than the one mixed on Cubase 6!

There you go.
Old 1st March 2012
  #17
Lives for gear
 
UnderTow's Avatar
 

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by parlopower View Post
It does indeed.

I compared a song I mixed on Cubase 6 with a song that Andy Wallace mixed on Cubase 6.5, and the song mixed on Cubase 6.5 sounded significantly better than the one mixed on Cubase 6!

There you go.


Alistair
Old 1st March 2012
  #18
Lives for gear
 
Cover'd's Avatar
Ok... can we have the porn back now please..?
Old 1st March 2012
  #19
mfx
Lives for gear
 
mfx's Avatar
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cover'd View Post
Ok... can we have the porn back now please..?
+1 The porn sounds better than 6.5
Old 2nd March 2012
  #20
Lives for gear
 
Jeff Hayat's Avatar
 

Yeah, but does the porn null with 6.5?
Old 6th March 2012
  #21
I can not only confirm that my mixes do indeed sound better on 6.5 when compared to C6, but I also look significantly better looking when listening to 6.5. Well done Steinberg - an all round great effort!
Old 6th March 2012
  #22
Lives for gear
 

The stereo field is so wide that tracks don't sit In the mix, they sit AROUND the mix.
Old 6th March 2012
  #23
Lives for gear
 
UnderTow's Avatar
 

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Porto View Post
The stereo field is so wide that tracks don't sit In the mix, they sit AROUND the mix.
My neighbours complain when I pan stuff too wide. It ends up smack bang in the middle of their living room.

And when I did a mix at another studio I accidentally clipped a passing cyclist on the road outside the studio while doing a surround mix.

Beware!

Alistair
Old 6th March 2012
  #24
Lives for gear
 

!6 esabuC naht retterb hcum sdnuos 5.6 esabuC

Last edited by vinvanda; 6th March 2012 at 05:24 PM.. Reason: thought flipping the phase would null but it didnt?
Old 6th March 2012
  #25
Lives for gear
 

apparently shure are going to introduce an sm7.5b soon, only £40 to upgrade!

has a bugfix that means it does justify the hype after all
Old 6th March 2012
  #26
Lives for gear
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by vinvanda View Post
apparently shure are going to introduce an sm7.5b soon, only £40 to upgrade!

has a bugfix that means it does justify the hype after all

Actually, the SM7b is the third revision of the original SM7. The SM7a addressed noise issues, and improved the mount. The SM7b added the bigger foam windscreen. I don't recall anyone demanding their original SM7 be upgraded for free.
Old 6th March 2012
  #27
Gear Guru
 
theblue1's Avatar
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by UnderTow View Post
Made you look.

Alistair
ONLY because I saw who was posting it.





Quote:
Originally Posted by peeej1978 View Post
I can not only confirm that my mixes do indeed sound better on 6.5 when compared to C6, but I also look significantly better looking when listening to 6.5. Well done Steinberg - an all round great effort!
That's interesting, because I always felt like listening to Logic made me feel fat and bloated but I could never prove it because I don't have a scale or a full-length mirror. I'm looking for a robust methodology to test these theories...




I'm looking for a witty, thoroughly engaging DAW with just a clever hint of a frisky, playful aftertaste.
Old 7th March 2012
  #28
Gear addict
 
stafs's Avatar
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by parlopower View Post
It does indeed.

I compared a song I mixed on Cubase 6 with a song that Andy Wallace mixed on Cubase 6.5, and the song mixed on Cubase 6.5 sounded significantly better than the one mixed on Cubase 6!

There you go.
Deem, now i'm sure - i have to upgrade.
Old 7th March 2012
  #29
Gear nut
 

About 0.5 better?
Old 7th March 2012
  #30
Lives for gear
 
Jeff Hayat's Avatar
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by dugan03 View Post
About 0.5 better?
About $50 better.
New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn  Submit Thread to Google+ Google+ 
 
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter / Forum
Replies
Wolfgang / Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording
10

Forum Jump
 
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.