![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,214
Thread Starter | Sonnox 'Franuhofer' Pro-Codec. Any users ? Is it useful ?
Hi, Any Sonnox 'Fraunhofer' Plug-in users ? What do you think about it ? http://www.sonnoxplugins.com/pub/plu.../pro-codec.htm How useful has is it been for you ? Results compared to not using 'Fraunhofer' ? Any feedback/comments would be interesting, and helpful. Thanks, Muziksculp
__________________ Muziksculp's Blog |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,214
Thread Starter |
hmmm... this doesn't seem to be popular No one using it ? I wonder why ? Priced too high ? or something of a luxury that is not needed ? |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2006 Location: Nashville
Posts: 1,137
| IMO, yes, both. $300 to convert an MP3?...or a different kind of Mp3? It's still gonna be an MP3. However, if it were $100, I would seriously entertain it. I do think it would be useful. But as far as I now, it doesn't do anything special that you can't do with a standalone program, and once you pick the codec that sounds the best for most material, you would probably just use the same codec every time. Almost like a shootout plugin to decide which MP3 codec you should be using
|
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear |
IMO a niche product. That alone warrants the high price. If at 1/3 of the price you get 2x more customers this dictates you keep a high price. I can really see that a digital outlet or a digital label could use this. Being able to hear artifacts in real time is no small feat! Just not a product for me |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
I think compression artifacts are so material dependent that they felt compelled to do this plugin. Otherwise there would have been a sticky here sating: OMG 192khz mp3 the best.. should only use that one forever. | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,214
Thread Starter |
If Sonnox just priced it right from the start, many more users would be using it. Maybe $175 or less makes more sense, and would have given Sonnox a much better return on their investment, since a much larger customer base would have been attainable. I feel that the $300. asking price is too steep, but then maybe not for those who feel it's worth the money for what it offers in return. and as far as I know it is the only product that offers real-time monitoring of a codec's resulting audio quality, and let's you tweak the options until you like what you hear, all in real-time ! So far no feedback from users of this plug-in. I'm sure someone is using it on GSlutz |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear |
Software processor is great. It's for optimizing your uploads and for preparing Internet music. That's what we use it for. Paid for it the first day we had it. You have to pay for quality.
__________________ Atelier HudSonic, Chicago EARS-Chicago (Engineering And Recording Society) visit me at https://public.me.com/hudsonic1 to hear recordings and ephemera |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,214
Thread Starter | Quote:
You mention preparing Internet music, is this mainly mp3 streaming/download music ? i.e. would it improve using it for improving sound quality of mp3 files uploaded to 'Soundcloud' , and similar streaming audio hosting websites, or would these type of hosting sites own codec ruin the audio quality prepared via a specialized codec plug-in such as the Sonnox 'Fraunhofer' ? Regarding having to pay for quality, I agree 100%, my main interest in this plug-in was to find out how useful it is, and the kinds of applications it is used in. I don't mind paying for quality, and a very useful utility. Interestingly, I have not read much about it here on GSlutz, and it is rarely (or never) mentioned in various mp3 sound quality related topics. Cheers, Muziksculp | |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,214
Thread Starter |
Here is a review in SOS about Sonnox's 'Franuhofer' Pro-Codec plug-in : Sonnox Fraunhofer Pro?Codec And a Video demoing it : |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear Head Joined: Jan 2012 Location: rome
Posts: 41
|
overpriced!!!
|
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear | Mastering???
I could see a mastering studio using this for their clients.
|
| | |
| | #12 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,214
Thread Starter |
Would you buy it if it was priced at $150. (50% of the actual price ?)
|
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| getting 'audio overload' when using sonnox (updated) plug ins | boon | Music computers | 1 | 29th March 2012 09:36 PM |
| Is it uncommon to record at 24 bit 44.1khz? | XxFeendogxX | Newbie audio engineering & production question zone (trial beta forum) | 2 | 8th February 2012 08:37 AM |
| Any Halion users here? How is it | Tube World | Music computers | 5 | 12th December 2011 12:16 AM |
| Any Kontakt users here? How hard is it to.. | perx | Music computers | 4 | 9th October 2008 06:36 PM |
| To buy 824's or not to buy? that is the question.. | stereobot | So much gear, so little time! | 27 | 2nd July 2007 09:11 PM |
| |