![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Jul 2008 Location: Canada
Posts: 200
Thread Starter | Is Windows 7 as efficient as Windows XP?? (CPU Problem)
I just upgraded from XP to 7 Pro 64 bit! It's nice that Windows is now reading my 6 gigs of ram, but I'm having some serious CPU problems. I loaded a few sessions that I did in XP with all the same plugins, and VIs. But now I'm having some huge CPU spikes with pops and clicks and constantly getting the message: "Error -9128. "You're running out of CPU power. Take out some plug-ins to free up CPU power". I've done everything suggested here: DAE error -6031 or -9128. 'You're running out of CPU power. Take out some plug-ins to free up CPU power.' or here: http://avid.custkb.com/avid/app/selfservice/search.jsp?DocId=349411 I was never getting this with XP. Could the problem be with Windows 7? Or Pro-Tools 8? I'm very disappointed because I thought that with Windows 7 I would get more mileage, not less!!!! I have Pro-Tools 8 LE. i7 920, 2.66 Ghz Anybody got this same issue or something similar? Or anyone knows how to fix this? Thanks!! |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2010 Location: Mountain US
Posts: 865
|
"Generally" speaking, Win 7 is more (far more, I should say?) efficeint than XP. But in the case of Pro Tools, and the use of multicore CPUs, there may be an issue. So, it's better to consult folks at DUC, if you haven't. Sorry for littel help, but wanted to say something.
|
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Jul 2008 Location: Canada
Posts: 200
Thread Starter |
Thank you for trying to help I've read that reducing the processor to 7? instead of 8 would help,or reducing it further. It does not fix the problem. In Windows Task Manager I've checked to see if their was something wrong with the CPU but nothing is out of the ordinary. So my guess is with Pro-Tools 8.0.5 (The latest version). Could there be a bug with Windows 7?? (32 or 64) In XP I've never had any of those problems!!! |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2007 Location: Saint Louis
Posts: 1,482
|
Hi Luc! I'm no expert on Windows by far, but I do know that you could get some better mileage (kilometerage?) by turning off the Aero interface: Disable Aero on Windows 7 or Vista - How-To Geek I hope this helps in any way. Like I say, I'm no expert. Good luck!
__________________ "I can't read anymore of Larry Mal posts. I'm beginning to sound like King Arthur, Elton John, Susan Boyle, Wolf Blitzer, Freddy Jackson and Snoop Dogg mixed into one." |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,211
|
What are the full specs of your hardware and which version of XP were you using before?
__________________ Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #6 |
| 3 + infractions, forum membership suspended. |
It's definitely not a Win 7 problem. Also consider that while W7 reads your 6 gigs, PT8 does not, since it's still 32-bit software. I agree with Masaaki, most likely your DAW is only using one core. Either you upgrade to PT9/10 (the former still has multi-core issues, incidentally, albeit probably to a lesser extent) or you go back to XP. Disabling aero will only gain you a tiny fraction of CPU power. In other words, it won't solve your problem.
|
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2006 Location: Northwest USA
Posts: 3,006
| Quote:
You do *not* need to disable the Aero theme entirely to to this either btw, you can simply right click on your shortcut that you use to run PT 8 LE and check the 'disable desktop compositing' checkbox so that Aero is disabled whenever PT 8 LE is running. The OP should mention the other hardware details including how he is connecting to network(s) (wifi/wireless? if ethernet what is the NIC in use? Realtek? Onboard? etc?), what graphics card(s) is(are) in use? What cpu? etc... | |
| | |
| | #8 | ||
| Gear maniac Joined: Jul 2008 Location: Canada
Posts: 200
Thread Starter | Quote:
Quote:
ok here's my complete computer specs. Windows 7 Pro 64 bit i7 920 2.66 Mhz 6 gig ram Corsair XMS3 P6TD Deluxe Motherboard Radeon HD 4350 Pro-Tools 003R. Keep in mind that I didn't have any of those problems with XP with the exact same setup. So some of you are saying that my DAW is only using ONE core instead of all of them (8)?? So it's a bug in Pro-Tools WITH Windows 7 then? How about Pro-Tools 10? Is it any better? Has this problem been addressed?? Thanks to everyone that is trying to help, even though I'm not quoting you, doesn't mean I'm not reading. I've done the Aero thing, but only when I'm in Pro-Tools. Thanks !! | ||
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2010 Location: Mountain US
Posts: 865
|
One thing you can do very easily is to check the CPU Usage graph, from Windows Task Manager. Just Ctrl+Alt+Del will activate the task manager. Check the CPU usage WHILE you are running the PT with your plug ins. Do you see on only one core goes up? |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2006 Location: Northwest USA
Posts: 3,006
|
Check with this too while running PT 8 LE under load: DPC Latency Checker There's threads here you can search for "DPC Latency" on these forums to find out how to identify problematic issues (if any) and how to fix them. |
| | |
| | #11 | ||
| Gear maniac Joined: Jul 2008 Location: Canada
Posts: 200
Thread Starter | Quote:
Quote:
| ||
| | |
| | #12 |
| Gear interested Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3
| Power Options
I'm running a Vista 64 bit OS and I had to change my power option. You get there by opening up your computer tag and navigate until you find power options. Make sure its set for high performance. It will be a custom setting.
|
| | |
| | #13 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 179
|
Power options definitely need checking. also.... Maybe I'm confusing matters here, but could also be a double help...have you looked at jBridge, the €14.99 vst bridging plugin. It would certainly allow you to make use of your extra RAM that protools cant, but it also seems to redistribute multiprocessing of those bridged plugins better than host, though I'm speaking here of Ableton Live, I dont use PT. http://jstuff.wordpress.com/jbridge/ |
| | |
| | #14 | |||
| Gear maniac Joined: Jul 2008 Location: Canada
Posts: 200
Thread Starter | Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Power options is the next thing I'm going to try. I'll see if it works. Thanks for the suggestions. I'll take a loot at jBrigde and see if it is something that would be useful for Pro-Tools. If nothing works then I can upgrade to Pro-Tools 10. Thanks | |||
| | |
| | #15 |
| Gear interested Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 13
|
Hi, I think your problem is due to the fact that you are running a 32bits process on your win7 x64. Under win7 x64 all 32bits process are run within a 32bits emulated context for technical architecture reasons (you don't want to know). This means your 32bits daw runs slower on your x64 than it would do on a native x86. Sent from my HTC Desire using Gearslutz.com
__________________ My bands : Until She Dies (metal) http://soundcloud.com/until-she-dies Element KyS (rock) http://soundcloud.com/element-kys |
| | |
| | #17 | ||
| Gear maniac Joined: Jul 2008 Location: Canada
Posts: 200
Thread Starter | Quote:
Quote:
Is there any way to check if the theres a hardware conflict? | ||
| | |
| | #18 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2010 Location: Mountain US
Posts: 865
|
I remember I used PT M-powered 8.0.1 in Win 7 64 bit, in i7 950 machine, and it was buggy. Update to 8.0.4 or 8.0.5 stabilized it, and since then I haven't updated. But I don't use many plug ins. Are you sure your LE is updated, and also any of your plug ins causing this problem? |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Jul 2008 Location: Canada
Posts: 200
Thread Starter |
Maybe. I'm using mostly Waves plugs, but they said that it was working fine in Windows 7 64...!!!! Kontakt 5, VCC. |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2006 Location: Northwest USA
Posts: 3,006
|
32bit apps run fine in Win7, the WOW64 system adds negligable cpu overhead since the portion that impacts audio processing should only be utilizing 'thunking' (converting to 64bit memory pointers) rather than API & dll calls (outside of instantiating a plugin into memory of course). It may be adding negligable overhead in converting GDI+ legacy graphics calls, but the GDI+ round trip between cpu & Aero itself adds so much more this is the concern in that particular case. The thunking overhead to be concerned about is memory not cpu, but it's not so much that a 32bit app running on a system with 6-8GB of ram is going to have a problem. Hardware drivers are the first concern (hence DPC latency checker), especially gpu, wireless, cpu bound ethernet (cheap onboard) and 3rd party USB/raid etc chipsets. Beyond that PT 8 LE is indeed not an ideal match for Win7 out of the gate, make sure you're updated as others have suggested. |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Gear interested Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 13
|
No offence but I assure you this is nothing like negligible when you run a x86 process in a x64 OS. It's an issue I'm concerned with in my daily work. But I agree 7's Aero is more demanding than was xp's Luna ![]() Luc Sabourin honestly if I were you, having a x64 environment I would switch to a x64 DAW. Your actual x86 DAW can only address 2Go out of your 6Go and execution is slightly slower than it would be on a native x86 OS. It's a bit like having a ferrari but using it on a mud road. |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2006 Location: Northwest USA
Posts: 3,006
|
While you're correct about more memory address space, I'd like to see where WOW64 is impacting anything beyond what I've mentioned (calls to the system provided APIs and minor overhead for men address translation). And notice I haven't said no effect but when someone needs a tuneup & oil change, recommending a Ferrari isn't the point. It's still possible for him to stay with the program he knows and fix the issues he's having so he can be productive as before.
|
| | |
| | #23 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Jul 2008 Location: Canada
Posts: 200
Thread Starter |
Could this be why my CPU spikes all the time? For example my CPU is about 40-45% on a busy mix, but it suddenly spikes to 80% for no apparent reason, then the error pops up. I have to wait a few seconds or a minute, then the CPU drops back down, and when I replay the same part, there aren't any CPU spikes...! I'm on the last PT8 upgrade, 8.0.5 and it was my understanding that only this version could be on Win7. |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2006 Location: Northwest USA
Posts: 3,006
|
The only way to *know* what the source of the issue is, is to troubleshoot things one by one or a few changes at a time and test. We can only give you general hints based on our own past experiences with Win7, PT8 LE, and hardware--and what we've read online in regards to other's experience. Most of the things suggested in this thread are also available here: Windows Guide - Windows 7 Optimizations and Troubleshooting. Your system however is MUCH more suited to Windows 7 than it was XP given the hardware you're running, and so you should be able to easily tune it to run very well. There's plenty of people using less under Win7 without issue... Check your motherboard, if you're using Asus make sure none of their autotuning crap (Asus utilities) is running in the background it's a very well known cause of cpu/DPC issues. Also bios updates, driver updates and so on can all potentially help. PT 8 LE may still require desktop compositing off, go through that guide above, etc. |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2007 Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 741
|
Download this DPC Latency Monitor and run it for a few minutes. It'll tell you exactly which piece of hardware/driver is causing your issue. Resplendence Software - LatencyMon: suitability checker for real-time audio and other tasks
__________________ www.mikeplas.com |
| | |
| | #26 | ||
| Gear maniac Joined: Jul 2008 Location: Canada
Posts: 200
Thread Starter | Quote:
Quote:
| ||
| | |
| | #27 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2010 Location: Mountain US
Posts: 865
|
LatencyMon lists the name of the drivers causing DPC latency, unlike the popular DPC Latency Checker by thesycon. But as long as your DPC latency doesn't show spikes, your problem is around Pro Tools and/or 64bit addressing by your plug ins. Do you see the same error, without plug ins? Have you add/remove plug ins, and see which one is causing the errors? I would troubleshoot that part first. |
| | |
| | #28 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2007 Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,267
| Quote:
Also, spikes in CPU can mean that you have an I/O bottleneck somewhere. Make sure your recording drive is sufficiently fast and only does recording. If you're using VI's that use samples, put them on another drive.
__________________ - It looks just like a Telefunken U47 - with leather. You'll love it ... - Jazz is not dead - it just smells funny. - It doesn't make much difference how the paint is put on as long as something has been said. Technique is just a means of arriving at a statement. | |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Jul 2008 Location: Canada
Posts: 200
Thread Starter |
I've done what some of you said and bypassed a few plugs. Without any plugs I the CPU goes to 5% or 10% depending. With EQs and compressors, and other things in a busy mix it goes to around 30%. But as soon as I engage Kontakt 5, my CPU goes to 50%, but suddenly spikes horribly at around 80-90% with pops and crackles. Each time my CPU would spike I would bypass Kontakt and the CPU would go to 30%. I have Slate's VCC and it sucks a lot of CPU, but never provokes those awful spikes. Kontakt takes around 20% of my power. |
| | |
| | #30 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2006 Location: Northwest USA
Posts: 3,006
|
Progress then, now you should identify why those patches cause such cpu overload. Are they using the built in impulse reverb or are they stalling on trying to access the disk?..etc.
|
| | |