Software Compression on mix buss - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Music computers


Software Compression on mix buss

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 1st September 2003   #1
Gear maniac
 
Heterodox's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 289

Thread Starter
Software Compression on mix buss

Hey there...dumb question really:

When using a software compressor on your master output is it proper to ensure there are no peaks BEFORE the comp is on? Its easy enough to squash away the peaks, but wouldn't the audio signal be degraded by handing the compressor a peaked out signal?
Heterodox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st September 2003   #2
Gearslutz.com admin
 
Jules's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Location: A Yank in London, UK
Posts: 17,805


er .... some folks 'buld' their mix by slamming into a compressor,so that bypassing the unit would reveal a crappy mix, their mix is COMPRESSOR DEPENDANT.

Thats one way.

Another way is to get a mix 'very close' to finished sounding - then just use a lick of compression to 'enhance' or'enrich' the overall sound.

Thas's another way

BOTH ways are acceptable, there are no hard & fast rules for this..

See what suits your way of working..


__________________
Jules

Add your reviews to the new reviews area!
Gearslutz on Facebook
Follow my GS picks on Twitter
Jules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st September 2003   #3
Lives for gear
 
jazzius's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Location: Amsterdam.....The Netherlands
Posts: 593

Most software (cubase, Logic, Samplitude etc) calculate internally at 32 bits which means it's almost impossible to clip the signal internally......'course once you reduce your bits to 16 or send your signal out thru a D/A it's a different kettle of fish.....but basically, if you're using some pukker software, you should be alright...just make sure your output level or 16bit level isn't clipped.......
.....some plugs (waves LinMB for instance) will clip the signal at the 16bit max (dunno why, probably not well written) so this is worth bearing in mind......i have no idea how PT deals with all this as i'm not a PT user.
__________________
Wisseloord Mastering
jazzius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd September 2003   #4
Lives for gear
 
Alécio Costa's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Location: Brazil, Florianópolis/SC
Posts: 1,734

Hey Erik, Waves again...do we need to change codes to make the stuff function better?
Alécio Costa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd September 2003   #5
Motown legend
 
Bob Olhsson's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Songwriter Gulch, Nashville TN
Posts: 10,877

Quote:
Originally posted by Jules
er .... some folks 'build' their mix by slamming into a compressor,so that bypassing the unit would reveal a crappy mix, their mix is COMPRESSOR DEPENDANT.

Thats one way.

Another way is to get a mix 'very close' to finished sounding - then just use a lick of compression to 'enhance' or'enrich' the overall sound.

Thas's another way

BOTH ways are acceptable, there are no hard & fast rules for this..

My experience has been that the latter approach translates a lot better but the former gets the job done faster!
Bob Olhsson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd September 2003   #6
Lives for gear
 
bassmac's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 683

Quote:
Originally posted by Jules
er .... some folks 'buld' their mix by slamming into a compressor,so that bypassing the unit would reveal a crappy mix, their mix is COMPRESSOR DEPENDANT.
Does this method typically use less compression in the mix?


Quote:
Another way is to get a mix 'very close' to finished sounding - then just use a lick of compression to 'enhance' or'enrich' the overall sound.
And does this way typically use more?


Just guessing... it would seem to suggest that - since one is more compressor dependent than the other.

???

bassmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd September 2003   #7
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 1,913

Send a message via AIM to Teacher
Quote:
Originally posted by bassmac
Does this method typically use less compression in the mix?




And does this way typically use more?


Just guessing... it would seem to suggest that - since one is more compressor dependent than the other.

???

its the other way around....at least for me....
Teacher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd September 2003   #8
Lives for gear
 
stealthbalance's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2003
Location: united states
Posts: 627

Quote:
Originally posted by bassmac
Does this method typically use less compression in the mix?




And does this way typically use more?


Just guessing... it would seem to suggest that - since one is more compressor dependent than the other.

???

-------------------------------
like the Teacher says - its the other way around. if you add mix buss compression as a final add on after the mix is done , it wont take as much gain reduction because the balances will change too much and dissrupt the levels. the only way that you can add more mix buss compression at the very end is if you have really pummelled each individual track with heavy compression.
i tend to mix into a buss compressor - and if i were to all of a sudden bypass the stereo buss compressor , then my mix would collapse. within the first hour of a mix i try to decide what kind of a record im shooting for and if that will include ANY mix compression , i will activate it very early on in the process. also for me the more i compress at mixtime , the less chance there is for a mastering guy to ruin a mix ive done. i dont really care what a mastering guy does or doesn't do - just as long as the levels don't change. MVHO
s
stealthbalance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd September 2003   #9
Lives for gear
 
jazzius's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Location: Amsterdam.....The Netherlands
Posts: 593

Quote:
Originally posted by bombguy
I don't believe the Waves LinMB quantizes to 16 bits. Doesn't really make sense. Where does this information originate from?

--Erik
Just tried it again for my own sanity........

......downloaded Waves and Samplitude demos onto my home computer (from where i write this)

Put an already maxed out track up another 12db (clipping like a loony)......inserted an L2.......L2 shows 12db gain reduction........insert a LinMB (with everything on zero) before the L2.......L2 now shows no gain reduction.........swapped LinMB for C4.........now L2 shows 12db GR again!..........what's going on here?
jazzius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd September 2003   #10
Lives for gear
 
Alécio Costa's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Location: Brazil, Florianópolis/SC
Posts: 1,734

"also for me the more i compress at mixtime , the less chance there is for a mastering guy to ruin a mix ive done. "


multiband compressors are famous for ****ing up balances, but high end analog stereo comps...

so?
Wisslord, your time bud!
Alécio Costa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd September 2003   #11
Lives for gear
 
jazzius's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Location: Amsterdam.....The Netherlands
Posts: 593

Bombguy, re-read my post.......I said the LinMB is set to null.......it's doing absolutely nothing on it's own (a phase flip null test proves this)..........with the LinMB in-line, it won't allow anything internally (in the DAW) above 0dBFS....the lack of GR on the L2 proves this.
jazzius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2003   #12
Gear maniac
 
drmad69's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 261

Hey, I confirmed that here at work also.

I am curious to see what it changes in my mixes since
I was using the timworks mastering compressor instead of L2.
Yet, I see it clip and do reduction, but on the stereo buss output,
I see the difference you where talking about.. Hmm. Could it
have something to do with the C4-LMB changes they made, LMB was supposed to be the C4 "upgrade"
drmad69 is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
New York compression on Stereo Buss? Jyean Electronic Music Instruments & Electronic Music Production 11 12th August 2010 05:52 PM
To compress or not to compress on master buss (project studio)? kozlikha Mastering forum 15 28th April 2009 03:52 PM
PSP MixSaturator on the Mix Buss Pronecobra Music computers 2 18th December 2007 05:56 AM
HF boost on mix buss during tracking and mixing? STUDIO2 So much gear, so little time! 6 9th February 2007 02:35 AM
compression on mix and overcompression mattianlaseppia So much gear, so little time! 6 8th February 2007 02:52 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:14 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.