wave arts tube saturator, is good for nothing - Page 2 - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Music computers


wave arts tube saturator, is good for nothing

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10th October 2011   #31
Lives for gear
 
Matti's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 3,756

Yes something is wrong. Check that all power savings are off in the BIOS
Check multiprocessor support is on in your daw
-Its difficult to give any meaningful advice with what I know and without seeing

Matti
Matti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th October 2011   #32
Lives for gear
 
jeronimo's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 3,228

Send a message via ICQ to jeronimo Send a message via AIM to jeronimo
Yes, something is wrong with how your system works with this thing.
I wouldn't recommend a clean install just because of a plugin.
Have you bought it already or you're just demoing it?
I would just forget it.
But that just me.
__________________
Think Diferente!
http://www.jeracravo.com
jeronimo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th February 2012   #33
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 2,284

Quote:
Originally Posted by taturana View Post
since i used to be a programmer, a long time ago, i really don't buy the idea that it couldn't be coded in a way to have better cpu performance without damaging the audio quality... most times that depends more on the way the algos works than everything else...these modern cpu's are quite impressive in power..

or else it's only valid as a lab experiment...
a CPU heavy plugin like this and showing an aliasing mess like this is just a joke.

I just ran the demo. Sound was not bad, still digital. Then a quick aliasing test. Plugin left my harddrive.

Looks like the most inefficient code in the world.
Attached Images
File Type: png Bildschirmfoto 2012-02-09 um 07.23.33.png (104.3 KB, 99 views)
HomeProducer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th February 2012   #34
Ultimate disciple of tone
 
Sensorychaos's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 472

wow!
Sensorychaos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th February 2012   #35
Lives for gear
 
javahut's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 557

Quote:
Originally Posted by HomeProducer View Post
a CPU heavy plugin like this and showing an aliasing mess like this is just a joke.

I just ran the demo. Sound was not bad, still digital. Then a quick aliasing test. Plugin left my harddrive.

Looks like the most inefficient code in the world.
Like you would know more about programming, designing plug-ins, aliasing and audio than the guys at Wave Arts... puh-leeze.
__________________
downtempo.dub.psychedelic.twang
Canartic lossless downloads now available !!!
Latest Canartic - Modulotion
javahut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th February 2012   #36
Lives for gear
 
mirrorboy's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 860

To the OP-

I know this may sound counter-intuitive but the first thing I would try is actually lowering your buffer to 1024. Then try 512.

The plug may have problems running at 2048- it's not a very common buffer size to run sessions.

Anyways, I'd give that a shot before anything.


Good luck!

Scott
__________________
Play what serves the song, not yourself.
__________________
www.thrivingivory.com
www.facebook.com/thrivingivory
www.facebook.com/scottleejason
mirrorboy is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:14 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.